IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i10p1642-d417986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advanced Mathematical Business Strategy Formulation Design

Author

Listed:
  • Song-Kyoo (Amang) Kim

    (School of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic Institute, Macao
    Current address: R. de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao, SAR.)

Abstract

This paper deals with the explicit design of strategy formulations to make the best strategic choices from a conventional matrix form of representing strategic choices. The explicit strategy formulation is an analytical model that is targeted to provide a mathematical strategy framework to find the best moment for strategy shifting to prepare rapid market changes. This theoretical model could be adapted into practically any strategic decision making situation when a strategic formulation is described as a matrix form with quantitative measured decision parameters. Analytically tractable results are obtained by using the fluctuation theory and these results are able to predict the best moments for changing strategies in a matrix form. This research can help strategy decision makers who want to find the optimal moments of shifting present strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Song-Kyoo (Amang) Kim, 2020. "Advanced Mathematical Business Strategy Formulation Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1642-:d:417986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1642/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1642/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Mukesh & Tsolakis, Naoum & Agarwal, Anshul & Srai, Jagjit Singh, 2020. "Developing distributed manufacturing strategies from the perspective of a product-process matrix," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Rui & Xu, Shoufu & Zhang, Yun, 2023. "Can digital transformation reduce within-firm pay inequality? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Chaudhuri, Atanu & Datta, Partha Priya & Fernandes, Kiran J. & Xiong, Yu, 2021. "Optimal pricing strategies for manufacturing-as-a service platforms to ensure business sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski & Stefan Šmugović & Dragana Tekić & Velibor Ivanović & Aleksandra Novaković & Dragan Tešanović & Maja Banjac & Bojan Đerčan & Tatjana Peulić & Beba Mutavdžić & Jasmina Lazarev, 2022. "Characteristics of Traditional Food Products as a Segment of Sustainable Consumption in Vojvodina’s Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Lőrincz, László & Losonci, Dávid & Demeter, Krisztina & Granát, Marcell, 2023. "Digitalizáció és üzleti teljesítmény - hazai feldolgozóipari tapasztalatok [Digitalisation and business performance - focusing on Hungarian manufacturing firms]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 82-102.
    5. Aine Petrulaityte & Fabrizio Ceschin & Eujin Pei & David Harrison, 2020. "Applying Distributed Manufacturing to Product-Service System Design: A Set of Near-Future Scenarios and a Design Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-39, June.
    6. Piya Kerdlap & Aloisius Rabata Purnama & Jonathan Sze Choong Low & Daren Zong Loong Tan & Claire Y. Barlow & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2022. "Comparing the environmental performance of distributed versus centralized plastic recycling systems: Applying hybrid simulation modeling to life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 252-271, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1642-:d:417986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.