IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i10p1626-d1656574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reference Set Generator: A Method for Pareto Front Approximation and Reference Set Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Angel E. Rodriguez-Fernandez

    (Departmento de Computación, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Mexico City 07360, Mexico)

  • Hao Wang

    (Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science and Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands)

  • Oliver Schütze

    (Departmento de Computación, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Mexico City 07360, Mexico)

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of obtaining bias-free and complete finite size approximations of the solution sets (Pareto fronts) of multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). Such approximations are, in particular, required for the fair usage of distance-based performance indicators, which are frequently used in evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). If the Pareto front approximations are biased or incomplete, the use of these performance indicators can lead to misleading or false information. To address this issue, we propose the Reference Set Generator (RSG), which can, in principle, be applied to Pareto fronts of any shape and dimension. We finally demonstrate the strength of the novel approach on several benchmark problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Angel E. Rodriguez-Fernandez & Hao Wang & Oliver Schütze, 2025. "Reference Set Generator: A Method for Pareto Front Approximation and Reference Set Generation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:1626-:d:1656574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/10/1626/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/10/1626/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Günter Rudolph & Oliver Schütze & Christian Grimme & Christian Domínguez-Medina & Heike Trautmann, 2016. "Optimal averaged Hausdorff archives for bi-objective problems: theoretical and numerical results," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 589-618, June.
    2. Hanne, Thomas, 1999. "On the convergence of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 553-564, September.
    3. Beume, Nicola & Naujoks, Boris & Emmerich, Michael, 2007. "SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1653-1669, September.
    4. Lourdes Uribe & Johan M Bogoya & Andrés Vargas & Adriana Lara & Günter Rudolph & Oliver Schütze, 2020. "A Set Based Newton Method for the Averaged Hausdorff Distance for Multi-Objective Reference Set Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Hanne, Thomas, 2007. "A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for approximating the efficient set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1723-1734, February.
    6. Federico Zuiani & Massimiliano Vasile, 2013. "Multi Agent Collaborative Search based on Tchebycheff decomposition," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 189-208, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laumanns, Marco & Zenklusen, Rico, 2011. "Stochastic convergence of random search methods to fixed size Pareto front approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 414-421, September.
    2. Gong, Wenyin & Cai, Zhihua, 2009. "An improved multiobjective differential evolution based on Pareto-adaptive [epsilon]-dominance and orthogonal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 576-601, October.
    3. Oliver Schütze & Adanay Martín & Adriana Lara & Sergio Alvarado & Eduardo Salinas & Carlos Coello, 2016. "The directed search method for multi-objective memetic algorithms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 305-332, March.
    4. Guerreiro, Andreia P. & Fonseca, Carlos M., 2020. "An analysis of the Hypervolume Sharpe-Ratio Indicator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 614-629.
    5. Audet, Charles & Bigeon, Jean & Cartier, Dominique & Le Digabel, Sébastien & Salomon, Ludovic, 2021. "Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 397-422.
    6. Liagkouras, Konstantinos & Metaxiotis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Improving multi-objective algorithms performance by emulating behaviors from the human social analogue in candidate solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1019-1036.
    7. Kawakib Arar Tahir, 2025. "A Systematic Review and Evolutionary Analysis of the Optimization Techniques and Software Tools in Hybrid Microgrid Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-32, April.
    8. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M & Thakkar, Jitesh J, 2019. "Environmentally conscious logistics planning for food grain industry considering wastages employing multi objective hybrid particle swarm optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 220-248.
    9. Andrea Ponti & Antonio Candelieri & Ilaria Giordani & Francesco Archetti, 2023. "Intrusion Detection in Networks by Wasserstein Enabled Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    10. David Quintana & Roman Denysiuk & Sandra García-Rodríguez & Antonio Gaspar-Cunha, 2017. "Portfolio implementation risk management using evolutionary multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01881379, HAL.
    11. Yunsong Han & Hong Yu & Cheng Sun, 2017. "Simulation-Based Multiobjective Optimization of Timber-Glass Residential Buildings in Severe Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Yeudiel Lara Moreno & Carlos Ignacio Hernández Castellanos, 2024. "A Hierarchical Approach to a Tri-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem Considering an ESG Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Ivo Couckuyt & Dirk Deschrijver & Tom Dhaene, 2014. "Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 575-594, November.
    14. Hanne, Thomas & Nickel, Stefan, 2005. "A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for scheduling and inspection planning in software development projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 663-678, December.
    15. O. Schütze & C. Hernández & E-G. Talbi & J. Q. Sun & Y. Naranjani & F.-R. Xiong, 2019. "Archivers for the representation of the set of approximate solutions for MOPs," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-105, February.
    16. Derbel, Bilel & Humeau, Jérémie & Liefooghe, Arnaud & Verel, Sébastien, 2014. "Distributed localized bi-objective search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 731-743.
    17. Hang Xu, 2024. "A Dynamic Tasking-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Bi-Objective Feature Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Sergio Cabello, 2023. "Faster distance-based representative skyline and k-center along pareto front in the plane," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 441-466, June.
    19. Sven Schulz & Udo Buscher & Liji Shen, 2020. "Multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling with variable discrete production speed levels and time-of-use energy prices," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(9), pages 1315-1343, November.
    20. Lourdes Uribe & Johan M Bogoya & Andrés Vargas & Adriana Lara & Günter Rudolph & Oliver Schütze, 2020. "A Set Based Newton Method for the Averaged Hausdorff Distance for Multi-Objective Reference Set Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:1626-:d:1656574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.