IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i18p4002-d1244284.html

Robustness of the cμ -Rule for an Unreliable Single-Server Two-Class Queueing System with Constant Retrial Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Efrosinin

    (Institute for Stochastics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria)

  • Natalia Stepanova

    (Scientific and Production Company “INSET”, Moscow 129085, Russia)

  • Janos Sztrik

    (Department of Informatics and Networks, Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

We study the robustness of the c μ -rule for the optimal allocation of a resource consisting of one unreliable server to parallel queues with two different classes of customers. The customers in queues can be served with respect to a FIFO retrial discipline, when the customers at the heads of queues repeatedly try to occupy the server at a random time. It is proved that for scheduling problems in the system without arrivals, the c μ -rule minimizes the total average cost. For the system with arrivals, it is difficult directly to prove the optimality of the same policy with explicit relations. We derived for an infinite-buffer model a static control policy that also prescribes the service for certain values of system parameters exclusively for the class- i customers if both of the queues are not empty, with the aim to minimize the average cost per unit of time. It is also shown that in a finite buffer case, the c μ -rule fails.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Efrosinin & Natalia Stepanova & Janos Sztrik, 2023. "Robustness of the cμ -Rule for an Unreliable Single-Server Two-Class Queueing System with Constant Retrial Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:18:p:4002-:d:1244284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/18/4002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/18/4002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonis Economou & Spyridoula Kanta, 2011. "Equilibrium customer strategies and social–profit maximization in the single‐server constant retrial queue," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 107-122, March.
    2. Wang, Jinting & Zhang, Xuelu & Huang, Ping, 2017. "Strategic behavior and social optimization in a constant retrial queue with the N-policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 841-849.
    3. K. Avrachenkov & E. Morozov & R. Nekrasova & B. Steyaert, 2014. "Stability Analysis And Simulation Of N-Class Retrial System With Constant Retrial Rates And Poisson Inputs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(02), pages 1-18.
    4. Dimitriou, Ioannis, 2018. "A two-class queueing system with constant retrial policy and general class dependent service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 1063-1073.
    5. Ruslana Nekrasova & Evsey Morozov & Dmitry Efrosinin & Natalia Stepanova, 2023. "Stability analysis of a two-class system with constant retrial rate and unreliable server," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 331(2), pages 1029-1051, December.
    6. J. Artalejo, 1999. "A classified bibliography of research on retrial queues: Progress in 1990–1999," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 7(2), pages 187-211, December.
    7. Anastasia Winkler, 2013. "Dynamic scheduling of a single-server two-class queue with constant retrial policy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 197-210, January.
    8. Efrosinin, Dmitry & Winkler, Anastasia, 2011. "Queueing system with a constant retrial rate, non-reliable server and threshold-based recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 594-605, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Dimitriou, 2016. "A queueing model with two classes of retrial customers and paired services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 123-143, March.
    2. Samira Taleb & Amar Aissani, 2016. "Preventive maintenance in an unreliable M/G/1 retrial queue with persistent and impatient customers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 291-317, December.
    3. Singh, Vijay Pratap & Jain, Madhu & Sharma, Richa, 2025. "N-policy for redundant machining system with double retrial orbits using soft computing techniques," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 42-69.
    4. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    5. Xianyue Shi & Liwei Liu, 2023. "Equilibrium Joining Strategies in the Retrial Queue with Two Classes of Customers and Delayed Vacations," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Shan Gao & Hua Dong & Xianchao Wang, 2021. "Equilibrium and pricing analysis for an unreliable retrial queue with limited idle period and single vacation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 621-643, March.
    7. Ioannis Dimitriou, 2016. "A queueing model with two classes of retrial customers and paired services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 123-143, March.
    8. Zhen Wang & Liwei Liu & Yiqiang Q. Zhao, 2022. "Equilibrium customer and socially optimal balking strategies in a constant retrial queue with multiple vacations and N-policy," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 870-908, May.
    9. Yoav Kerner & Ophir Shmuel-Bittner, 2020. "Strategic behavior and optimization in a hybrid M/M/1 queue with retrials," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 285-302, December.
    10. Zhongbin Wang & Jinting Wang, 2019. "Information heterogeneity in a retrial queue: throughput and social welfare maximization," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 131-172, June.
    11. Jain, Madhu & Bhagat, Amita & Shekhar, Chandra, 2015. "Double orbit finite retrial queues with priority customers and service interruptions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 324-344.
    12. Sheng Zhu & Jinting Wang & Bin Liu, 2020. "Equilibrium joining strategies in the Mn/G/1 queue with server breakdowns and repairs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2163-2187, December.
    13. Sanga, Sudeep Singh & Jain, Madhu, 2019. "Cost optimization and ANFIS computing for admission control of M/M/1/K queue with general retrial times and discouragement," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Yacov Satin & Evsey Morozov & Ruslana Nekrasova & Alexander Zeifman & Ksenia Kiseleva & Anna Sinitcina & Alexander Sipin & Galina Shilova & Irina Gudkova, 2018. "Upper bounds on the rate of convergence for constant retrial rate queueing model with two servers," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1282, December.
    15. Niyirora, Jerome & Zhuang, Jun, 2017. "Fluid approximations and control of queues in emergency departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1110-1124.
    16. Bara Kim & Jeongsim Kim, 2023. "Proof of the conjecture on the stability of a multi-class retrial queue with constant retrial rates," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 175-185, August.
    17. Se Won Lee & Bara Kim & Jeongsim Kim, 2022. "Analysis of the waiting time distribution in M/G/1 retrial queues with two way communication," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(2), pages 505-518, March.
    18. Zhao, Chen & Wang, Zhongbin, 2023. "The impact of line-sitting on a two-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 782-800.
    19. Sheng Zhu & Xuege Han & Jinting Wang & Zhongbin Wang, 2026. "Performance evaluation and equilibrium strategies for a mixed priority queueing system," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 1-32, March.
    20. Wee Meng Yeo & Xue-Ming Yuan & Joyce Mei Wan Low, 2017. "On $$M^{X}/G(M/H)/1$$ M X / G ( M / H ) / 1 retrial system with vacation: service helpline performance measurement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 553-578, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:18:p:4002-:d:1244284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.