IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i1p19-d756892.html

A Framework on the Use of Agile Methods in Logistics Startups

Author

Listed:
  • Malena Zielske

    (Faculty of Business and Enterprise, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 20099 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Tobias Held

    (Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 20099 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Athanasios Kourouklis

    (Faculty of Business and Enterprise, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK)

Abstract

Background: The logistics industry has seen the emergence of many startups in recent years. Many of these logistics startups use new technologies to develop disruptive products, services or platforms that are based on software. This paper presents the results of a Delphi study and a survey that were consolidated in a framework. The purpose is to understand the benefits that logistics startups derive from using agile methods, the difficulties they face in using these methods and the evolution of logistics startups in terms of using agile methods. Methods: A Delphi study with 29 experts and a global survey with 95 participants was conducted to look at the implementation of agile methods. The largest group of participants were members of (top) management, agile coaches and team leaders. Results: The framework consolidates gathered data to demonstrate how logistics startups apply agile methods and practices based on the results of the Delphi study and the survey, and how the usage of agile methods changes over the age of logistics startups. The results indicate that younger logistics startups use agile methods predominantly to design product features and maximise customer value, whereas logistics startups older than five years focus more on the optimisation of internal processes. Conclusions: The value of the present study lies in its contribution to the hitherto hardly examined research field of agility in logistics startups and the notable views of the experienced participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Malena Zielske & Tobias Held & Athanasios Kourouklis, 2022. "A Framework on the Use of Agile Methods in Logistics Startups," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:19-:d:756892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/19/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/19/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Halil Ibrahim Cebeci & Shahryar Ghorbani & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "An Integrated Approach for Evaluating Lean Innovation Practices in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Ahmed Zainul Abideen & Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram & Jaafar Pyeman & Abdul Kadir Othman & Shahryar Sorooshian, 2021. "Digital Twin Integrated Reinforced Learning in Supply Chain and Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, November.
    3. August-Wilhelm Scheer, 2017. "Theses on Digitalization," Management for Professionals, in: Ferri Abolhassan (ed.), The Drivers of Digital Transformation, chapter 4, pages 33-43, Springer.
    4. Takaki Nagao & Hiromasa Ijuin & Tetsuo Yamada & Keisuke Nagasawa & Lei Zhou, 2021. "COVID-19 Disruption Strategy for Redesigning Global Supply Chain Network across TPP Countries," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    6. Erik Hofmann & Florin Osterwalder, 2017. "Third-Party Logistics Providers in the Digital Age: Towards a New Competitive Arena?," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noha A. Mostafa & Omar Eldebaiky, 2023. "A Sustainable Two-Echelon Logistics Model with Shipment Consolidation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsega Y. Melesse & Chiara Franciosi & Valentina Di Pasquale & Stefano Riemma, 2023. "Analyzing the Implementation of Digital Twins in the Agri-Food Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    3. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Asif Qumer Gill & Brian Henderson-Sellers & Mahmood Niazi, 0. "Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    5. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2021. "Are the Supreme Audit Institutions Agile? A Cognitive Orientation and Agility Measures," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 52-62.
    6. Markus Hummel & Christoph Rosenkranz & Roland Holten, 2013. "The Role of Communication in Agile Systems Development," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(5), pages 343-355, October.
    7. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Józef Ledzianowski, 2021. "The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, October.
    8. Justin B. Ames & Kalle Lyytinen & Andrew K. Schnackenberg & Garima Sharma, 2025. "Charting Research Directions in Organizational Agility: Reconceptualizing the Agility Construct for Systematic Theory Development and Cumulative Empirical Inquiry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(2), pages 331-357, June.
    9. Ghiyoung Im & Arun Rai, 2014. "IT-Enabled Coordination for Ambidextrous Interorganizational Relationships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 72-92, March.
    10. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    11. Angelopoulos, Spyros & Brown, Michael & McAuley, Derek & Merali, Yasmin & Mortier, Richard & Price, Dominic, 2021. "Stewardship of personal data on social networking sites," Other publications TiSEM b4580589-d1e2-492a-96d3-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Costello Gabriel J., 2018. "Proposing an innovation-based view of the firm," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 37(1), pages 65-79.
    13. Zlatko Bodrožić & Paul S. Adler, 2022. "Alternative Futures for the Digital Transformation: A Macro-Level Schumpeterian Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 105-125, January.
    14. Lukasz Kanski & Katarzyna Budzynska & Jan Chadam, 2023. "The impact of identified agility components on project success—ICT industry perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Moritz Schüll & Peter Hofmann & Pascal Philipp & Nils Urbach, 2023. "Reporting in large-scale agile organizations: insights and recommendations from a case study in software development," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 571-601, September.
    16. Myung Kyo Kim & Ram Narasimhan & Tobias Schoenherr, 2020. "Leveraging Logistics Competence in New Product Sourcing: The Role of Strategic Intent and Impact on Performance," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Ludovica Moi & Francesca Cabiddu, 2021. "Leading digital transformation through an Agile Marketing Capability: the case of Spotahome," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1145-1177, December.
    18. Francisco José Gomes Silva & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos & Luis Pinto Ferreira & José Carlos Sá & Gilberto Santos & Maria Carolina Cancela Nogueira, 2022. "The three pillars of sustainability and agile project management: How do they influence each other," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1495-1512, September.
    19. Sarah Rietze & Hannes Zacher, 2022. "Relationships between Agile Work Practices and Occupational Well-Being: The Role of Job Demands and Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Friedrich, Anne & Lange, Anne & Elbert, Ralf, 2022. "How additive manufacturing drives business model change: The perspective of logistics service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:19-:d:756892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.