IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i2p44-d317911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Resilient Regions: Policy Recommendations for Stimulating Synergy between Tourism and Landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Jasper Heslinga

    (Department of Cultural Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Landleven 1, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
    European Tourism Futures Institute, Academy of Tourism and Leisure, NHL Stenden University, Rengerslaan 8-10, 8917 DD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands)

  • Peter Groote

    (Department of Cultural Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Landleven 1, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Frank Vanclay

    (Department of Cultural Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Landleven 1, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

To make regions more resilient, a useful idea is that of synergy between tourism and landscape (i.e., a win-win situation). To help policymakers manage for synergy, we provide practical recommendations. Using the case of Terschelling (the Netherlands), an island that is part of the UNESCO World Heritage listed Wadden Sea, we analyzed how policy and public opinion have been changing, and how multilevel governance is arranged. We recommend that: policymakers seek to understand the historical institutional context of a region; strive for integrated policy aimed at synergetic interactions; gain an overview of all stakeholders in the decision-making process; include all stakeholders; develop a shared story; co-create a clear vision for the future; but also allow flexibility in local implementation; and dare to experiment. Overall, we conclude that synergy is a promising concept that requires a different approach to decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasper Heslinga & Peter Groote & Frank Vanclay, 2020. "Towards Resilient Regions: Policy Recommendations for Stimulating Synergy between Tourism and Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:44-:d:317911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Vanclay & Ruth Lane & Joanna Wills & Ian Coates & Damian Lucas, 2004. ""Committing To Place" And Evaluating The Higher Purpose: Increasing Engagement In Natural Resource Management Through Museum Outreach And Educational Activities," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(04), pages 539-564.
    2. Andre Sorensen, 2015. "Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 17-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pinyu Chen & Yizheng Zhao & Di Zuo & Xiang Kong, 2021. "Tourism, Water Pollution, and Waterway Landscape Changes in a Traditional Village in the Huizhou Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Jasper Hessel Heslinga & Stefan Hartman, 2021. "Improving Governance Systems of National Parks: How the Instrument of a ‘Governance Scan’ Can Contribute," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Nora Mehnen & Ingo Mose & Peter Schaal & Frans Sijtsma & José Muñoz-Rojas & Mariia Fedoriak & Per Angelstam, 2023. "Periphery and Integrated Planning: Coping with Rural and Touristic Challenges across Scales in the German Wadden Sea Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Anna Marie Gjedrem & Torgrim Log, 2020. "Study of Heathland Succession, Prescribed Burning, and Future Perspectives at Kringsjå, Norway," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Zhe Wang & Lawal Marafa, 2021. "Tourism Imaginary and Landscape at Heritage Site: A Case in Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Theano S. Terkenli, 2021. "Research Advances in Tourism-Landscape Interrelations: An Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-8, September.
    7. Karina Castro-Arce & Frank Vanclay, 2020. "Community-Led Green Land Acquisition: Social Innovative Initiatives for Forest Protection and Regional Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Alessandro Bonadonna & Andrea Rostagno & Riccardo Beltramo, 2020. "Improving the Landscape and Tourism in Marginal Areas: The Case of Land Consolidation Associations in the North-West of Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Oumaima Lamhour & Larbi Safaa & Dalia Perkumienė, 2023. "What Does the Concept of Resilience in Tourism Mean in the Time of COVID-19? Results of a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Sorensen & Anna-Katharina Brenner, 2021. "Cities, Urban Property Systems, and Sustainability Transitions: Contested Processes of Institutional Change and the Regulation of Urban Property Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. repec:elg:eechap:14395_25 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Isti Hidayati & Claudia Yamu & Wendy Tan, 2019. "The Emergence of Mobility Inequality in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia: A Socio-Spatial Analysis of Path Dependencies in Transport–Land Use Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Maurice Jansen & Carola Hein, 2023. "Port city symbiosis: introduction to the special issue," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 211-229, June.
    6. Robert Home, 2021. "History and Prospects for African Land Governance: Institutions, Technology and ‘Land Rights for All’," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Roberta Fontan Pereira Galvão & Andrea Yuri Flores Urushima & Shoichiro Hara & Wil De Jong, 2020. "Analysis of Land Transition Features and Mechanisms in Peripheral Areas of Kyoto (1950–1960)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Min Ji, 2022. "Using a Historical Institutionalism Perspective to Examine Chinese Foundations’ Development Characteristics From the 1980s to 2017," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    9. Willem Salet, 2021. "Public Norms in Practices of Transitional Planning—The Case of Energy Transition in The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Munshifwa, Ephraim Kabunda, 2023. "Institutional analysis and informal urban settlements: A proposition for a new institutionalist grounded property rights perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. O’Brien, Philip & Lord, Alex & Dembski, Sebastian, 2020. "How do planners manage risk in alternative land development models? An institutional analysis of land development in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Meng Meng & Marcin Dąbrowski & Dominic Stead, 2023. "Governing Resilience Planning: Organizational Structures, Institutional Rules, and Fiscal Incentives in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Laura Turley, 2021. "From Power to Legitimacy—Explaining Historical and Contemporary Water Conflict at Yesa Reservoir (Spain) and Gross Reservoir (USA) Using Path Dependency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Stephan J. Hauser & Penglin Zhu, 2022. "The Shaping of Daqing: Borderless Interactions between Oil and Urban Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song & Chen Zhou, 2017. "Unsuccessful Urban Governance of Brownfield Land Redevelopment: A Lesson from the Toxic Soil Event in Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Vlaďka Kirschner & Daniel Franke & Veronika Řezáčová & Tomáš Peltan, 2022. "Poorer Regions Consume More Undeveloped but Less High-Quality Land Than Wealthier Regions—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Lähteenmäki, Jarno, 2021. "The evolution paths of neutral host businesses: Antecedents, strategies, and business models," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    18. Kevin Loughran, 2020. "Urban parks and urban problems: An historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2321-2338, August.
    19. Silver, Daniel & Fox, Mark & Adler, Patrick, 2020. "Towards a model of urban evolution I: context," SocArXiv yubkr, Center for Open Science.
    20. Simone Ruane & Mohammad Shahidul Hasan Swapan & Courtney Babb, 2020. "Disaster Risk Reduction in Bushfire Prone Areas: Challenges for an Integrated Land Use Planning Policy Regime," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    21. Alexander Woestenburg & Erwin van der Krabben & Tejo Spit, 2019. "Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:44-:d:317911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.