IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1881-d1749593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretable Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Data Reveal Soil Biogeochemistry Patterns in Agricultural Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ruslan Suleymanov

    (Laboratory of Soil Science, Ufa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, Russia
    Laboratory for Plant Biotechnology, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia)

  • Marija Yurkevich

    (Laboratory for Plant Biotechnology, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia)

  • Olga Bakhmet

    (Laboratory for Ecological Monitoring and Modeling, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia)

  • Tatiana Popova

    (Laboratory for Plant Biotechnology, Department of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia)

  • Andrey Kungurtsev

    (Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620002 Yekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Denis Zakirov

    (Department of Geodesy, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, Ufa University of Science and Technology, 450076 Ufa, Russia)

  • Anastasia Vittsenko

    (Department of Environmental Protection and Prudent Exploitation of Natural Resources, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, 450064 Ufa, Russia)

  • Gaurav Mishra

    (Centre of Excellence on Sustainable Land Management, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun 248006, Uttarakhand, India)

  • Azamat Suleymanov

    (Department of Geodesy, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, Ufa University of Science and Technology, 450076 Ufa, Russia)

Abstract

Soil condition represents a critical factor for ensuring sustainable agricultural development and food security. In this study, we examined the content of key soil properties and their patterns using an interpretable machine learning framework in combination with remote sensing data (Sentinel-2A) across several land use types in northwestern Russia. The analyzed soil properties in 64 samples included soil organic carbon (Corg), total nitrogen (N), mobile phosphorus (Pmob), total phosphorus (Ptot), and mobile potassium (Kmob) sampled across three land use types: cropland, hayfield, and forest. For machine learning interpretability, model-agnostic methods were utilized, including permutation and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) with spatial visualization. Our results revealed the highest concentrations of Corg (6.1 ± 4.3%), Kmob (78.3 ± 42.1%), and N (31.2 ± 14.5 mg/100 g) in forested areas, while both types of phosphorus (Ptot and Pmob) peaked in croplands (0.075 ± 0.024 and 0.023 ± 0.015%, respectively). The lowest values of Corg were observed in hayfields, and the lowest values of Kmob and N in croplands. Model validation demonstrated that Corg and N were predicted most accurately (R 2 = 0.53 and 0.55, respectively), where SWIR bands from Sentinel-2A satellite imagery were key predictors. The generated soil property maps and spatial SHAP values clearly showed distinct patterns correlated with land use types due to distinct biogeochemical processes across landscapes. Our findings demonstrate how land management practices fundamentally alter soil parameters, creating diagnostic spectral signatures that can be captured through interpretable machine learning and remote sensing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruslan Suleymanov & Marija Yurkevich & Olga Bakhmet & Tatiana Popova & Andrey Kungurtsev & Denis Zakirov & Anastasia Vittsenko & Gaurav Mishra & Azamat Suleymanov, 2025. "Interpretable Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Data Reveal Soil Biogeochemistry Patterns in Agricultural Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1881-:d:1749593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milda Muraškienė & Kęstutis Armolaitis & Iveta Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė & Virgilijus Baliuckas & Jūratė Aleinikovienė, 2023. "Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Rautiainen, Aapo & Virtanen, Tarmo & Kauppi, Pekka E., 2016. "Land cover change on the Isthmus of Karelia 1939–2005: Agricultural abandonment and natural succession," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P1), pages 127-134.
    3. Andrey V. Chinilin & Nikolay I. Lozbenev & Pavel M. Shilov & Pavel P. Fil & Ekaterina A. Levchenko & Daniil N. Kozlov, 2024. "Synergetic Use of Bare Soil Composite Imagery and Multitemporal Vegetation Remote Sensing for Soil Mapping (A Case Study from Samara Region’s Upland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Ponkina, Elena V. & Sun, Zhanli & Bavorova, Miroslava & Yekimovskaja, Olga A., 2021. "Revealing the intentions of farmers to recultivate abandoned farmland: A case study of the Buryat Republic in Russia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Solomon Kebebew & Bobe Bedadi & Teklu Erkossa & Fantaw Yimer & Lemma Wogi, 2022. "Effect of Different Land-Use Types on Soil Properties in Cheha District, South-Central Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    6. O. V. Andreeva & G. S. Kust, 2020. "Land Assessment in Russia Based on the Concept of Land Degradation Neutrality," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 593-602, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie & Qunli Zhai, 2022. "Management Policy of Farmers’ Cultivated Land Abandonment Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Francisco Simões & Ilkay Unay-Gailhard & Alen Mujčinović & Bernardo Fernandes, 2021. "How to Foster Rural Sustainability through Farming Workforce Rejuvenation? Looking into Involuntary Newcomers’ Spatial (Im)mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Yameng Jiang & Yefeng Jiang & Xi Guo & Zichun Guo & Yingcong Ye & Ji Huang & Jia Liu, 2025. "Monitoring of Farmland Abandonment Based on Google Earth Engine and Interpretable Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Gorgan, Maxim & Bavorova, Miroslava & Ullah, Ayat & Prishchepov, Alexander V., 2024. "The role of land market in shaping farmland abandonment in post-Soviet Armenia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Zebin Chen & Yonglin Chen & Chenhui Zhu & Yunping Zhang & Xiang Kong, 2025. "Determinants of Farmland Abandonment Among Peasants in Scattered Villages: The Impact of Family Structure and Social Policies in Southern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Vladimir Ivanov & Ivan Milyaev & Alexander Konstantinov & Sergey Loiko, 2022. "Land-Use Changes on Ob River Floodplain (Western Siberia, Russia) in Context of Natural and Social Changes over Past 200 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Subedi, Yuba Raj & Kristiansen, Paul & Cacho, Oscar, 2022. "Reutilising abandoned cropland in the Hill agroecological region of Nepal: Options and farmers’ preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Xingtao Liu & Shudong Wang & Xiaoyuan Zhang & Lin Zhen & Chenyang Ma & Saw Yan Naing & Kai Liu & Hang Li, 2025. "Monitoring Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Farmland Abandonment and Recultivation Using Phenological Metrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Bao, Helen X.H. & Robinson, Guy M., 2022. "Behavioural land use policy studies: Past, present, and future," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Guiomar, N. & Godinho, S. & Pinto-Correia, T. & Almeida, M. & Bartolini, F. & Bezák, P. & Biró, M. & Bjørkhaug, H. & Bojnec, Š. & Brunori, G. & Corazzin, M. & Czekaj, M. & Davidova, S. & Kania, J. & K, 2018. "Typology and distribution of small farms in Europe: Towards a better picture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 784-798.
    11. Baixue Wang & Weiming Cheng & Keyu Song & Suiji Wang & Yichi Zhang & Hao Li & Jiayin Deng & Ruibo Wang, 2022. "Application of Ecology-Geomorphology Cognition Approach in Land Type Classification: A Case Study in the Altay Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Herrieth Machiwa & Joseph Mango & Dhritiraj Sengupta & Yunxuan Zhou, 2021. "Using Time-Series Remote Sensing Images in Monitoring the Spatial–Temporal Dynamics of LULC in the Msimbazi Basin, Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Yue Su & Cheng Wang & Yue Huang & Yan Xie & Junhui Zhu & Yuanyuan Sun & Yongjun Li, 2022. "Study on Spatio-Temporal Pattern Changes and Prediction of Arable Land Abandonment in Developed Area: Take Pingyang County as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Jian Zhou & Shan Jiang & Sanjit Kumar Mondal & Jinlong Huang & Buda Su & Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz & Ziyan Chen & Runhong Xu & Tong Jiang, 2022. "China’s Socioeconomic and CO 2 Status Concerning Future Land-Use Change under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Pollyana Mona Soares Dias & Jeane Cruz Portela & Joaquim Emanuel Fernandes Gondim & Rafael Oliveira Batista & Leticia Sequinatto Rossi & Jonatan Levi Ferreira Medeiros & Phâmella Kalliny Pereira Faria, 2023. "Soil Attributes and Their Interrelationships with Resistance to Root Penetration and Water Infiltration in Areas with Different Land Uses in the Apodi Plateau, Semiarid Region of Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Xiaoxi Gao & Nobuyoshi Yasunaga & Norikazu Inoue, 2023. "Pathways influencing bearers and abandoned farmlands through farmland intermediate management institutions: using prefectural data in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1261-1287, December.
    17. Hengfei Song & Liangjie Xin & Xiubin Li & Xue Wang & Yufeng He & Wen Song, 2022. "Can Livestock Raising Alleviate Farmland Abandonment?—Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Song, Hengfei & Li, Xiubin & Xin, Liangjie & Dong, Shijie & Wang, Xue, 2025. "Conflicts between ecological and agricultural production functions: The impact of the Grain for Green Program and wildlife damage on cropland abandonment in China’s mountainous areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Simões, Francisco & Unay-Gailhard, Ilkay & Mujčinović, Alen & Fernandes, Bernardo, 2021. "How to foster rural sustainability through farming workforce rejuvenation? Looking into involuntary newcomers’ spatial (im)mobilities," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(15).
    20. Dobrynin, Denis & Vorbrugg, Alexander & Hujala, Teppo, 2025. "Forestry on abandoned agricultural land: Future options for Russia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1881-:d:1749593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.