IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1383-d1692378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey Analysis Comparing Perceptions of Plastic Use in Nurseries and Greenhouses in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Alexa J. Lamm

    (Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • James S. Owen

    (Application Technology Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)

  • James Altland

    (Application Technology Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)

  • Sarah A. White

    (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631, USA)

Abstract

Plastic is extensively used in nursery and greenhouse operations. Concerns are growing about the potential release of plastic byproducts, such as microplastics and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), into water resources. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare perceptions of plastic use and water quality impacts between scientists researching water contaminants and nursery/greenhouse growers, (2) identify barriers to growers reducing plastic use, and (3) explore preferred communication channels for scientists to inform growers about emerging research. An online survey was administered to collect data from scientists in a USDA-funded multi-state Hatch project ( N = 20) and nursery/greenhouse growers ( N = 66) across the United States. The findings indicated both groups were unsure of the impacts of plastic use. While most respondents perceived surface water pollution as a critical issue, neither scientists nor growers strongly agreed on-farm plastic use poses a significant threat. Both groups recognized the importance of regular water testing, but few believed mandatory changes to plastic use should be enacted without further evidence. Growers cited limited equipment, financial constraints, and uncertain availability of viable plastic alternatives as key barriers. Despite these barriers, growers were willing to learn more, primarily through online resources, short courses, and workshops. The findings underscore the need for targeted research that quantifies plastic byproducts in nursery/greenhouse water and identifies cost-effective alternatives. Timely dissemination of scientific findings using trusted sources will be critical to bridge knowledge gaps and support adoption of best practices to safeguard water quality in surface and groundwater.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexa J. Lamm & James S. Owen & James Altland & Sarah A. White, 2025. "A Survey Analysis Comparing Perceptions of Plastic Use in Nurseries and Greenhouses in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1383-:d:1692378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaurav Jha & Vanaja Kankarla & Everald McLennon & Suman Pal & Debjani Sihi & Biswanath Dari & Dawson Diaz & Mallika Nocco, 2021. "Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems: Environmental Exposure and Human Health Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Xinyu Dong & Jiaguo Li & Ning Xu & Junjie Lei & Zhen He & Limin Zhao, 2024. "A Novel Phenology-Based Index for Plastic-Mulched Farmland Extraction and Its Application in a Typical Agricultural Region of China Using Sentinel-2 Imagery and Google Earth Engine," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Yang Yi & Mingchang Shi & Mengjie Gao & Guimin Zhang & Luqi Xing & Chen Zhang & Jianwu Xie, 2023. "Comparative Study on Object-Oriented Identification Methods of Plastic Greenhouses Based on Landsat Operational Land Imager," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Eric E. Calloway & Alethea L. Chiappone & Harrison J. Schmitt & Daniel Sullivan & Ben Gerhardstein & Pamela G. Tucker & Jamie Rayman & Amy L. Yaroch, 2020. "Exploring Community Psychosocial Stress Related to Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Contamination: Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shiryn D. Sukhram & Ji Kim & Sabrina Musovic & Ayotunde Anidugbe & Emiliano Corte & Tasneem Ahsan & Selvia Rofail & Nicolli Mesquita & Miguel Padilla, 2025. "PFAS Exposure, Mental Health, and Environmental Justice in the United States: Impacts on Marginalized Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(7), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Marialuisa Menegatto & Adriano Zamperini, 2023. "Health and Psychological Concerns of Communities Affected by Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances: The Case of Residents Living in the Orange Area of the Veneto Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Sali Khair Biek & Leadin S. Khudur & Andrew S. Ball, 2024. "Challenges and Remediation Strategies for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Contamination in Composting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Marialuisa Menegatto & Sara Lezzi & Michele Musolino & Adriano Zamperini, 2022. "The Psychological Impact of Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Pollution in the Veneto Region, Italy: A Qualitative Study with Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Zhifeng Wang & Keyun Wei & Bolan Wen & Kaijiang You & Huilin Wang & Chengxuan Ye & Fulong Ren, 2025. "Research on the Allocation Level of Land for Agricultural Facilities Based on Green and High-Quality Development: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1383-:d:1692378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.