IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1112-d1660111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biophilic Urbanism Across Scales: Enhancing Urban Nature Through Experience and Design

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah C. Lefosse

    (Environmental Technology and Design, Department of Urbanism, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
    Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions, 1018 JA Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Maryam Naghibi

    (Urban Design, Department of Urbanism, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Sitong Luo

    (Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions, 1018 JA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Arjan van Timmeren

    (Environmental Technology and Design, Department of Urbanism, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

As urban density increases and cities expand, there is a decrease in urban livability, which is closely linked to social, economic, and environmental crises. To address these negative impacts, biophilic urbanism (BU) promotes human–nature interactions and their associated benefits. However, knowledge gaps remain regarding its effectiveness across different scales. This study explores how BU contributes to improving livability in the built environment and to renewing urban landscapes. Using Amsterdam as a case study, we first identified biophilic experiences by analyzing them through quantitative, qualitative, and spatial distribution metrics. We then investigated designs that foster biophilia by applying BU tools aimed at enhancing interspecies connections and leveraging ecosystem services. Our findings, in the form of maps, provide evidence-based insights to benefit everyday life using nature in settings at different scales, along with design solutions to renew urban planning, focus on human and environmental well-being, and involve citizens in spatial transformations and maintenance processes. Finally, we advocate for BU as a holistic model that uses natural capital as a key strategy for making cities more equitable, sustainable, and resilient.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah C. Lefosse & Maryam Naghibi & Sitong Luo & Arjan van Timmeren, 2025. "Biophilic Urbanism Across Scales: Enhancing Urban Nature Through Experience and Design," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1112-:d:1660111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Thomas Beery & K. Ingemar Jönsson & Johan Elmberg, 2015. "From Environmental Connectedness to Sustainable Futures: Topophilia and Human Affiliation with Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Giles Thomson & Peter Newman, 2021. "Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 75-88.
    4. Giles Thomson & Peter Newman, 2021. "Green Infrastructure and Biophilic Urbanism as Tools for Integrating Resource Efficient and Ecological Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 75-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deborah Lefosse & Arjan van Timmeren & Carlo Ratti, 2023. "Biophilia Upscaling: A Systematic Literature Review Based on a Three-Metric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-34, November.
    2. Paul Osmond & Sara Wilkinson, 2021. "City Planning and Green Infrastructure: Embedding Ecology into Urban Decision-Making," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1-4.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0193993 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Inmaculada Aznar-Díaz & Francisco-Javier Hinojo-Lucena & María-Pilar Cáceres-Reche & Juan-Manuel Trujillo-Torres & José-María Romero-Rodríguez, 2019. "Environmental Attitudes in Trainee Teachers in Primary Education. The Future of Biodiversity Preservation and Environmental Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Zofia Chyleńska & Eliza Rybska & Sylwia Jaskulska & Maciej Błaszak & Barbara Jankowiak, 2022. "How about the Attitudes towards Nature? Analysis of the Nature and Biology Primary School Education Curricula in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Wenjie Xu & Wenjing Dai & Yanfen Ding & Shanshan Song & Qian Liu & Wei Yang, 2024. "Drivers of Spontaneous Plant Communities in Urban Parks: A Case from Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Angelica Pianegonda & Sara Favargiotti & Marco Ciolli, 2022. "Rural–Urban Metabolism: A Methodological Approach for Carbon-Positive and Circular Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Enrique A. Mundaca & Mariana Lazzaro-Salazar & Lucas Pujol-Cols & María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada, 2021. "The Emotional and Cognitive Scale of the Human–Nature Relationship (ECS-HNR)," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    9. Sergi Nuss-Girona & Joan Vicente Rufí & Guillem Canaleta, 2020. "50 Years of Environmental Activism in Girona, Catalonia: From Case Advocacy to Regional Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Nicole V. DeVille & Linda Powers Tomasso & Olivia P. Stoddard & Grete E. Wilt & Teresa H. Horton & Kathleen L. Wolf & Eric Brymer & Peter H. Kahn & Peter James, 2021. "Time Spent in Nature Is Associated with Increased Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Lucia Bosone & Raquel Bertoldo, 2022. "The Greater the Contact, the Closer the Threat: The Influence of Contact with Nature on the Social Perception of Biodiversity Loss and the Effectiveness of Conservation Behaviours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Jonathan P. Reeves & Conor H. D. John & Kevin A. Wood & Phoebe R. Maund, 2021. "A Qualitative Analysis of UK Wetland Visitor Centres as a Health Resource," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Kyung Hee Oh & Won Sop Shin & Tae Gyu Khil & Dong Jun Kim, 2020. "Six-Step Model of Nature-Based Therapy Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan, 2016. "Transforming Life: A Broad View of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Concept from an Ecological Justice Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-44, November.
    15. Dominik Sędzicki & Jan Cudzik & Lucyna Nyka, 2023. "Computer-Aided Greenery Design—Prototype Green Structure Improving Human Health in Urban Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Min-Seong Kim & Jinwon Kim & Brijesh Thapa, 2018. "Influence of Environmental Knowledge on Affect, Nature Affiliation and Pro-Environmental Behaviors among Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Bum-Jin Park & Chang-Seob Shin & Won-Sop Shin & Chung-Yeub Chung & Si-Hyung Lee & Dong-Jun Kim & Youn-Hee Kim & Chang-Eun Park, 2020. "Effects of Forest Therapy on Health Promotion among Middle-Aged Women: Focusing on Physiological Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Mundaca, Enrique A. & Lazzaro-Salazar, Mariana & Pujol-Cols, Lucas J. & Muñoz-Quezada, María Teresa, 2021. "The Emotional and Cognitive Scale of the Human-Nature Relationship (ECS-HNR)," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3504, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    19. Xueting Tong & Zhanwei Wu, 2020. "An IoT-based Sharing Plant Factory System for Nature Connectedness Improvement in Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Aleksandra Nowysz & Łukasz Mazur & Magdalena Daria Vaverková & Eugeniusz Koda & Jan Winkler, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as an Alternative Source of Food and Water Security in Today’s Sustainable Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    21. Yin Hui Ng & Shinya Numata, 2024. "Liking of and Willingness to Coexist with Animals among Residents near Nature-Based Destinations," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1112-:d:1660111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.