IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p850-d1633940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Centres and Intra-Regional Peripheral Zones in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Gibas

    (Faculty of Spatial Economy and Regions in Transition, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Krystian Heffner

    (Faculty of Spatial Economy and Regions in Transition, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

The new EU Cohesion Policy for 2021–2027 aims for inclusive and sustainable growth to address regional disparities by improving transport connectivity, digitalisation, and social inclusion, thereby reducing peripheral isolation. It is intended to provide development tools and enable investments in green and digital transitions to integrate peripheral areas more effectively with their development centres. This study assumes that, considering the EU cohesion policy objectives, regional centres (in Poland, centres of administrative territorial units named Voivodeships) should exert significant economic and social influence over their administrative regions. This aligns with both classic spatial concepts of socio-economic development and contemporary approaches to sustainable development. The research aimed to assess the extent to which regional centres are connected to their regions and their impact on the entire regional hinterland, particularly on municipalities outside the agglomeration system. The study identified municipalities that lack the influence of regional centres, creating zones with challenging socio-economic development conditions (based on the road network and the population potential of the Huff model). The analysis reveals that the highest probabilities are observed near Warsaw (Mazowieckie voivodeship; 0.7548) while the lowest are around Olsztyn (Warmińsko-Mazurskie voivodeship; 0.6763). The deepest depression in terms of usage of the regional capital is observed in the Zachodniopomorskie voivodeship. In this voivodeship, municipalities in the internal peripheries have an average probability coefficient of 0.3015.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Gibas & Krystian Heffner, 2025. "Regional Centres and Intra-Regional Peripheral Zones in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:850-:d:1633940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alois Humer, 2018. "Linking polycentricity concepts to periphery: implications for an integrative Austrian strategic spatial planning practice," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 635-652, April.
    2. Agnieszka Stanowicka, 2015. "Metropolitan Areas In Poland – State Of Development And Its Barriers," OLSZTYN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 143-156, May.
    3. Marcińczak, Szymon & Bartosiewicz, Bartosz, 2018. "Commuting patterns and urban form: Evidence from Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 31-39.
    4. Wojciech Kisiała & Artur Bajerski & Bartosz Stępiński, 2017. "Equalising or Polarising: The Centre–Periphery Model and the Absorption of EU Funds under Regional Operational Programmes in Poland," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 67(3), pages 413-434, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:509-520 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jiří Malý & Marek Lichter & Tomáš Krejčí, 2024. "The elusive role of urban form, centrality and scale in the absence of a metropolitan planning agenda: Central European perspective," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    3. De Toni, Andrea & Di Martino, Paolo & Dax, Thomas, 2021. "Location matters. Are science and policy arenas facing the Inner Peripheries challenges in EU?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Piotr Rosik & Sławomir Goliszek & Tomasz Komornicki & Patryk Duma, 2021. "Forecast of the Impact of Electric Car Battery Performance and Infrastructural and Demographic Changes on Cumulative Accessibility for the Five Most Populous Cities in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Bram van Vulpen, 2020. "Rethinking The Regional Bounds Of Justice: A Scoping Review Of Spatial Justice In Eu Regions," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 5-34, DECEMBER.
    6. Renyang Wang & Qingsong He & Lu Zhang & Huiying Wang, 2021. "Coupling Cellular Automata and a Genetic Algorithm to Generate a Vibrant Urban Form—A Case Study of Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Štraub, Daniel & Kębłowski, Wojciech & Maciejewska, Monika, 2023. "From Bełchatów to Żory: Charting Poland's geography of fare-free public transport programmes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Ye Ma & Biying Yu & Meimei Xue, 2018. "Spatial Heterogeneous Characteristics of Ridesharing in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Hananel, Ravit & Azary-Viesel, Sagit & Nachmany, Harel, 2021. "Spatial gaps – Narrowing or widening? Changes in spatial dynamics in the new millennium," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Maciej Nowak & Viktoriya Pantyley & Małgorzata Blaszke & Liudmila Fakeyeva & Roman Lozynskyy & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Spatial Planning at the National Level: Comparison of Legal and Strategic Instruments in a Case Study of Belarus, Ukraine, and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Trojanek, Maria & Kisiala, Wojciech & Trojanek, Radoslaw, 2021. "Do local governments follow their neighbours’ tax strategies? Tax mimicking amongst Polish municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Lanfredi, Maria & Egidi, Gianluca & Bianchini, Leonardo & Salvati, Luca, 2022. "One size does not fit all: A tale of polycentric development and land degradation in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Pengfei Lin & Jiancheng Weng & Dimitrios Alivanistos & Siyong Ma & Baocai Yin, 2020. "Identifying and Segmenting Commuting Behavior Patterns Based on Smart Card Data and Travel Survey Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:850-:d:1633940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.