IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p673-d1618055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Central Place Theory Based on Mobile Signal Data: The Case of Urban Parks in Beijing and Changsha

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Wen

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Hang Yin

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Zhanhong Ma

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Jiajie Peng

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Kai Tang

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Deyi Yao

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Guangxin Xiang

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Liyan Xu

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Junyan Ye

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Hongbin Yu

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

The Central Place Theory (CPT) proposed the basic concepts of central places and their service areas. Urban parks provide a wide variety of ecosystem services to residents. Most studies on central places focus on urban commercial facilities; however, it remains unclear whether parks exhibit patterns of central places, what features their service areas, and hierarchical structures. Based on mobile signaling data, we identified the service areas, dominant influence areas, and hierarchical structures of Beijing and Changsha. We also analyzed the factors influencing the hierarchical structure of park services, as well as the number of visitors and dominant service areas at each level of parks. We found that visits by residents to parks in Beijing and Changsha exhibit a clear hierarchical structure. Parks that occupy the top level attract a large number of residents and demonstrate strong service capacity and extensive coverage. We also found that park area and infrastructure attributes are significantly correlated with the hierarchical outcomes in Changsha but entirely different results in Beijing. Box plot analysis of visitor numbers and service areas at each level reveals that the influencing factors for these two aspects differ. Overall, both cities’ parks exhibit centrality and hierarchical structures in providing services to residents; however, there is a considerable difference in the factors influencing visitor numbers and dominant service areas for the two cities. These conclusions provide important theoretical support for government officials to better understand the characteristics of park services and offer practical guidance for optimizing urban park planning, enhancing service efficiency, and formulating policies that promote equitable access to green spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Wen & Hang Yin & Zhanhong Ma & Jiajie Peng & Kai Tang & Deyi Yao & Guangxin Xiang & Liyan Xu & Junyan Ye & Hongbin Yu, 2025. "Central Place Theory Based on Mobile Signal Data: The Case of Urban Parks in Beijing and Changsha," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:673-:d:1618055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burcu H. Ozuduru & Chris J. Webster & Alain J. F. Chiaradia & Eda Yucesoy, 2021. "Associating street-network centrality with spontaneous and planned subcentres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2059-2078, August.
    2. Buchel, Sophie & Frantzeskaki, Niki, 2015. "Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 169-177.
    3. Peter J Taylor, 2009. "Urban Economics in Thrall to Christaller: A Misguided Search for City Hierarchies in External Urban Relations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2550-2555, November.
    4. Fischer, L.K. & Honold, J. & Botzat, A. & Brinkmeyer, D. & Cvejić, R. & Delshammar, T. & Elands, B. & Haase, D. & Kabisch, N. & Karle, S.J. & Lafortezza, R. & Nastran, M. & Nielsen, A.B. & van der Jag, 2018. "Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 455-467.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy Phillips & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2021. "Use-Related and Socio-Demographic Variations in Urban Green Space Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Amy Phillips & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2021. "Use-related and socio-demographic variations in urban green space preferences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/326192, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Weixuan Wei & Yiqi Wang & Qi Yan & Guanpeng Liu & Nannan Dong, 2024. "Assessing Buffer Gradient Synergies: Comparing Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Urban Park Ecosystem Services in Century Park, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, November.
    4. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Buckwell, Andrew & Fleming, Christopher & Muurmans, Maggie & Smart, James & Mackey, Brendan, 2020. "Revealing the dominant discourses of stakeholders towards natural resource management in Port Resolution, Vanuatu, using Q-method," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305231, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Xiang Liu & Xiaohong Chen & Scott Orford & Mingshu Tian & Guojian Zou, 2024. "Does better accessibility always mean higher house prices?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2179-2195, November.
    8. Arturo Sanchez-Porras & María Guadalupe Tenorio-Arvide & Ricardo Darío Peña-Moreno & María Laura Sampedro-Rosas & Sonia Emilia Silva-Gómez, 2018. "Evaluation of the Potential Change to the Ecosystem Service Provision Due to Industrialization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Peng Zhan & Guang Hu & Ruilian Han & Yu Kang, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Visitation and Revisitation of Urban Parks: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    10. Dou, Yuehan & Zhen, Lin & De Groot, Rudolf & Du, Bingzhen & Yu, Xiubo, 2017. "Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 79-90.
    11. Hu, Xinlei & Huang, Jie & Shi, Feng, 2022. "A robustness assessment with passenger flow data of high-speed rail network in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    12. Jinlong Chen & Zhonglei Yu & Mengxia Li & Xiao Huang, 2023. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Vegetation Coverage in Urban Built-Up Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Ben-Simchon, Eyal & Grunwald, Yael & Ben-Ari, Giora & Rosenfeld, Arie & Shelef, Oren, 2022. "A village a field? Agronomic evaluation of fruit trees in inhabited space – Lessons for land use policy from a case study in Israel's Sharon Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Sy, Mariam Maki & Rey-Valette, Hélène & Simier, Monique & Pasqualini, Vanina & Figuières, Charles & De Wit, Rutger, 2018. "Identifying Consensus on Coastal Lagoons Ecosystem Services and Conservation Priorities for an Effective Decision Making: A Q Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Ruochen Ma & Yuxin Luo & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Gender Differences and Optimizing Women’s Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Visual Behavior While Viewing Urban Park Landscapes in Tokyo, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Potschin-Young, M. & Haines-Young, R. & Görg, C. & Heink, U. & Jax, K. & Schleyer, C., 2018. "Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 428-440.
    17. Stępniewska, Małgorzata, 2021. "The capacity of urban parks for providing regulating and cultural ecosystem services versus their social perception," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Yuanting Yang & Wei Duan, 2024. "An Interpretation of Landscape Preferences Based on Geographic and Social Media Data to Understand Different Cultural Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Shimei Li & Xueyan Zeng & Xiaoguang Zhang & Jiancheng Jiang & Furong Wang & Tianci Zhang & Jiacheng Zhang, 2024. "Spatial Justice of Urban Park Green Space under Multiple Travel Modes and at Multiple Scales: A Case Study of Qingdao City Center, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Halkos, George & Leonti, Aikaterini & Sardianou, Eleni, 2021. "Activities, motivations and satisfaction of urban parks visitors: A structural equation modeling analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 502-513.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:673-:d:1618055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.