IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p673-d1618055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Central Place Theory Based on Mobile Signal Data: The Case of Urban Parks in Beijing and Changsha

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Wen

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Hang Yin

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Zhanhong Ma

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Jiajie Peng

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Kai Tang

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Deyi Yao

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Guangxin Xiang

    (Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources, Changsha 410119, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410119, China)

  • Liyan Xu

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Junyan Ye

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Hongbin Yu

    (College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

The Central Place Theory (CPT) proposed the basic concepts of central places and their service areas. Urban parks provide a wide variety of ecosystem services to residents. Most studies on central places focus on urban commercial facilities; however, it remains unclear whether parks exhibit patterns of central places, what features their service areas, and hierarchical structures. Based on mobile signaling data, we identified the service areas, dominant influence areas, and hierarchical structures of Beijing and Changsha. We also analyzed the factors influencing the hierarchical structure of park services, as well as the number of visitors and dominant service areas at each level of parks. We found that visits by residents to parks in Beijing and Changsha exhibit a clear hierarchical structure. Parks that occupy the top level attract a large number of residents and demonstrate strong service capacity and extensive coverage. We also found that park area and infrastructure attributes are significantly correlated with the hierarchical outcomes in Changsha but entirely different results in Beijing. Box plot analysis of visitor numbers and service areas at each level reveals that the influencing factors for these two aspects differ. Overall, both cities’ parks exhibit centrality and hierarchical structures in providing services to residents; however, there is a considerable difference in the factors influencing visitor numbers and dominant service areas for the two cities. These conclusions provide important theoretical support for government officials to better understand the characteristics of park services and offer practical guidance for optimizing urban park planning, enhancing service efficiency, and formulating policies that promote equitable access to green spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Wen & Hang Yin & Zhanhong Ma & Jiajie Peng & Kai Tang & Deyi Yao & Guangxin Xiang & Liyan Xu & Junyan Ye & Hongbin Yu, 2025. "Central Place Theory Based on Mobile Signal Data: The Case of Urban Parks in Beijing and Changsha," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:673-:d:1618055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burcu H. Ozuduru & Chris J. Webster & Alain J. F. Chiaradia & Eda Yucesoy, 2021. "Associating street-network centrality with spontaneous and planned subcentres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2059-2078, August.
    2. Peter J Taylor, 2009. "Urban Economics in Thrall to Christaller: A Misguided Search for City Hierarchies in External Urban Relations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2550-2555, November.
    3. Fischer, L.K. & Honold, J. & Botzat, A. & Brinkmeyer, D. & Cvejić, R. & Delshammar, T. & Elands, B. & Haase, D. & Kabisch, N. & Karle, S.J. & Lafortezza, R. & Nastran, M. & Nielsen, A.B. & van der Jag, 2018. "Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 455-467.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang Liu & Xiaohong Chen & Scott Orford & Mingshu Tian & Guojian Zou, 2024. "Does better accessibility always mean higher house prices?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2179-2195, November.
    2. Guangxi Shen & Zipeng Song & Jiacong Xu & Lishuang Zou & Lijin Huang & Yingnan Li, 2023. "Are Ecosystem Services Provided by Street Trees at Parcel Level Worthy of Attention? A Case Study of a Campus in Zhenjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Amy Phillips & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2021. "Use-Related and Socio-Demographic Variations in Urban Green Space Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Eve Burrows & Margaret O’Mahony & Dermot Geraghty, 2018. "How Urban Parks Offer Opportunities for Physical Activity in Dublin, Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Peng Zhan & Guang Hu & Ruilian Han & Yu Kang, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Visitation and Revisitation of Urban Parks: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Amy Phillips & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2021. "Use-related and socio-demographic variations in urban green space preferences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/326192, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Maund, Phoebe R. & Irvine, Katherine N. & Dallimer, Martin & Fish, Robert & Austen, Gail E. & Davies, Zoe G., 2020. "Do ecosystem service frameworks represent people’s values?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    8. Ruiz-Frau, A. & Ospina-Alvarez, A. & Villasante, S. & Pita, P. & Maya-Jariego, I. & de Juan, S., 2020. "Using graph theory and social media data to assess cultural ecosystem services in coastal areas: Method development and application," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    9. Hu, Xinlei & Huang, Jie & Shi, Feng, 2022. "A robustness assessment with passenger flow data of high-speed rail network in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    10. Yang Yang & Zhifang Wang & Guangsi Lin, 2021. "Performance Assessment Indicators for Comparing Recreational Services of Urban Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Jinlong Chen & Zhonglei Yu & Mengxia Li & Xiao Huang, 2023. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Vegetation Coverage in Urban Built-Up Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Nina Schwarz & Annegret Haase & Dagmar Haase & Nadja Kabisch & Sigrun Kabisch & Veronika Liebelt & Dieter Rink & Michael W. Strohbach & Juliane Welz & Manuel Wolff, 2021. "How Are Urban Green Spaces and Residential Development Related? A Synopsis of Multi-Perspective Analyses for Leipzig, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Ben-Simchon, Eyal & Grunwald, Yael & Ben-Ari, Giora & Rosenfeld, Arie & Shelef, Oren, 2022. "A village a field? Agronomic evaluation of fruit trees in inhabited space – Lessons for land use policy from a case study in Israel's Sharon Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Tang, Chenghui & Guan, Mingming & Dou, Jianmin, 2021. "Understanding the impact of High Speed Railway on urban innovation performance from the perspective of agglomeration externalities and network externalities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Jörg Priess & Luis Valença Pinto & Ieva Misiune & Julia Palliwoda, 2021. "Ecosystem Service Use and the Motivations for Use in Central Parks in Three European Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Ruochen Ma & Yuxin Luo & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Gender Differences and Optimizing Women’s Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Visual Behavior While Viewing Urban Park Landscapes in Tokyo, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Spence, Danielle S. & Schuster-Wallace, Corinne J. & Lloyd-Smith, Patrick, 2023. "Disparities in economic values for nature-based activities in Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Weixuan Wei & Yiqi Wang & Qi Yan & Guanpeng Liu & Nannan Dong, 2024. "Assessing Buffer Gradient Synergies: Comparing Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Urban Park Ecosystem Services in Century Park, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, November.
    19. Haoran Yang & Martin Dijst & Patrick Witte & Hans van Ginkel & Jiao’e Wang, 2019. "Comparing passenger flow and time schedule data to analyse High-Speed Railways and urban networks in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1267-1287, May.
    20. Peter J. Taylor & Michael Hoyler & Raf Verbruggen, 2010. "External Urban Relational Process: Introducing Central Flow Theory to Complement Central Place Theory," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(13), pages 2803-2818, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:673-:d:1618055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.