IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p601-d1611238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Ecosystem Service Value to LULC Under Multi-Scenario Simulation Considering Policy Spatial Constraints: A Case Study of an Ecological Barrier Region in China

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Zhang

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhanqi Wang

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hanwen Du

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law Evaluation, Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Haiyang Li

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Analyzing the complex dynamics of land use, accurately assessing ecosystem service values (ESVs), and predicting future trends in land use and ESVs alterations within the spatial constraints of policies are essential for policymaking and advancing sustainable development objectives. This study analyzed land use/land cover (LULC) changes in Yunnan Province from 2005 to 2020. Policy constraints were incorporated into the scenario simulations, and an improved equivalent factor method, Markov-PLUS model, global spatial autocorrelation, and the Getis-Ord Gi* method were applied to predict and analyze LULC and ESVs under different scenarios for 2030. The findings revealed the following: (1) Forests and grasslands were the dominant land use categories in YNP, with notable alterations in land use patterns recorded between 2005 and 2020. (2) The total ESVs in the study area increased by CNY 8.152 billion during this period, exhibiting an initial decline followed by gradual recovery. (3) Simulations for 2030 indicated that the natural development scenario would lead to the most extensive urbanization, while the ecological conservation scenario would yield the greatest increase in total ESVs. In contrast, only the farmland conservation scenario led to an increase in food production-related ESVs, but resulted in the lowest total ESVs among the three scenarios. These results contribute to understanding the impacts of land use changes on ESVs, and provide insights for formulating scientifically sound and effective ecological protection and development policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Zhang & Zhanqi Wang & Hanwen Du & Haiyang Li, 2025. "Response of Ecosystem Service Value to LULC Under Multi-Scenario Simulation Considering Policy Spatial Constraints: A Case Study of an Ecological Barrier Region in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:601-:d:1611238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Mostafizur Rahman & György Szabó, 2021. "Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Urban Ecosystem Service Value in Dhaka, Bangladesh," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Lyu, Rongfang & Clarke, Keith C. & Zhang, Jianming & Feng, Junli & Jia, Xuehui & Li, Jijun, 2021. "Dynamics of spatial relationships among ecosystem services and their determinants: Implications for land use system reform in Northwestern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Behnoosh Abbasnezhad & Jesse B. Abrams & Seth J. Wenger, 2024. "The Impact of Projected Land Use Changes on the Availability of Ecosystem Services in the Upper Flint River Watershed, USA," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Jing Shi & Peiji Shi & Ziyang Wang & Lirong Wang & Yali Li, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Driving Force Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value in Arid Areas Based on PLUS Model: A Case Study of Jiuquan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Md. Mostafizur Rahman & György Szabó, 2021. "A Geospatial Approach to Measure Social Benefits in Urban Land Use Optimization Problem," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Fuli Wang & Wei Fu & Jiancheng Chen, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in Yunnan Based on Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Maomao Zhang & Enqing Chen & Cheng Zhang & Chen Liu & Jianxing Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value Based on the Markov–FLUS Model in Ezhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Li Na & Yangling Zhao & Luo Guo, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Urbanization in Inner Mongolia, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Fengran Wei & Mingshun Xiang & Lanlan Deng & Yao Wang & Wenheng Li & Suhua Yang & Zhenni Wu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Their Driving Forces of Ecological Service Value in Transitional Geospace: A Case Study in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Shuai Chen & Shunbo Yao, 2024. "Evaluation of the protection effectiveness of national key ecological functional area based on land use and ecosystem service value," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 12467-12487, May.
    9. Xiang Li & Jiang Zhu & Tao Liu & Xiangdong Yin & Jiangchun Yao & Hao Jiang & Bing Bu & Jianlong Yan & Yixuan Li & Zhangcheng Chen, 2023. "Quota and Space Allocations of New Urban Land Supported by Urban Growth Simulations: A Case Study of Guangzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Kassouri, Yacouba & Alola, Andrew Adewale, 2022. "Towards unlocking sustainable land consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: Analysing spatio-temporal variation of built-up land footprint and its determinants," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Shengnan Li & Baohang Hui & Cai Jin & Xuehan Liu & Fan Xu & Chong Su & Tan Li, 2022. "Considering Farmers’ Heterogeneity to Payment Ecosystem Services Participation: A Choice Experiment and Agent-Based Model Analysis in Xin’an River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Qilong Shao & Li Peng & Yichan Liu & Yongchang Li, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Urban Ecosystem Services: Structure, Evolution, and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Yuan Li & Bin Xu & Yan Li & Yuxuan Wan, 2025. "Impact of LULC in Coastal Cities on Terrestrial Carbon Storage and Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Yuhang Zhang & Zhenqi Hu & Jiazheng Han & Xizhao Liu & Zhanjie Feng & Xi Zhang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Relationship between Ecological Restoration Space and Ecosystem Services in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Yabo Zhao & Weiwei Zhang & Cansong Li & Shifa Ma & Xiwen Zhang & Haiyan Jiang, 2022. "Disturbances Brought about by Human Activities in Relation to the Eco-Environment of the Main Stream of the Tarim River, 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Zhao, Xiaoqing & Xu, Yifei & Pu, Junwei & Tao, Junyi & Chen, Yanjun & Huang, Pei & Shi, Xinyu & Ran, Yuju & Gu, Zexian, 2024. "Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Lu Jiao & Rui Yang & Yinling Zhang & Jian Yin & Jiayu Huang, 2022. "The Evolution and Determinants of Ecosystem Services in Guizhou—A Typical Karst Mountainous Area in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Jing Li & Jian Qiu & Majid Amani-Beni & Yuyang Wang & Mian Yang & Juewen Chen, 2023. "A Modified Equivalent Factor Method Evaluation Model Based on Land Use Changes in Tianfu New Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Hui Yang & Liang Zheng & Ying Wang & Jiangfeng Li & Bowen Zhang & Yuzhe Bi, 2022. "Quantifying the Relationship between Land Use Intensity and Ecosystem Services’ Value in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Case Study of the Hubei Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Mingjun Cai & Bin Ouyang & Matthew Quayson, 2024. "Navigating the Nexus between Rural Revitalization and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analyses of Current Status, Progress, and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:601-:d:1611238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.