IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p430-d1594654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Coordination Relationship and Zoning Optimization of Territorial Spatial Functions in Southern Karst Regions Based on a Multi-Scale Fusion Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Feng

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Research Center for Natural Resources Management and Public Policy, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xiaodong Yu

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Yan Zhou

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Renling Dong

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Dong Wu

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Meilin Zhang

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

Territorial Space (TS) is characterized by its multifunctionality. The identification and management of Territorial Spatial Functions (TSFs) across multi-scale is crucial for achieving the SDGs. However, previous studies have primarily concentrated on the variations in TSFs within the administrative or grid units at a single scale, with multi-scale investigations remaining a challenge. This study focuses on the typical karst region of Guangxi province in China and develops a Multi-Scale Fusion model (MSF) for assessing TSFs and employs a coupling coordination degree (CCD) model to examine the TSFs relationships. Furthermore, principal component analysis (PCA) is used to classify various types of influencing factors, and the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index is employed to identify the primary types of influencing factors at the county level. The study integrates coupling coordination types and advantage factors into the zoning process. The results demonstrate: (1) Ecological function is the dominant function. At the administrative unit scale, production and living functions exhibit a spatial pattern of “high in the southeast and low in the northwest”, while ecological function shows the opposite pattern. Under grid units scale and multi-scale fusion, the high and low texture characteristics of production and ecological functions are more pronounced. (2) TSFs are primarily characterized by slight and moderate disorder. Slight disorder is widely distributed, while moderate disorder is predominantly found in the northwest karst mountainous regions. In contrast, coordinated relationships are more frequently observed in urban areas. (3) The driver types of TSFs can be categorized into four categories: Terrain-Population, Agriculture Development, Location-Economy, and Non-Agriculture Development. By integrating the TSFs relationships, six zones are delineated. Based on this, precise and differentiated optimization suggestions are proposed to promote orderly utilization and sustainable development of TS.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Feng & Xiaodong Yu & Yan Zhou & Renling Dong & Dong Wu & Meilin Zhang, 2025. "Research on the Coordination Relationship and Zoning Optimization of Territorial Spatial Functions in Southern Karst Regions Based on a Multi-Scale Fusion Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:430-:d:1594654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longgao Chen & Xiaoyan Yang & Long Li & Longqian Chen & Yu Zhang, 2021. "The Natural and Socioeconomic Influences on Land-Use Intensity: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Yafang Zhao & Jiafu Liu & Jie Zhang & Xiaonan Zhang & Hongbo Li & Fengjie Gao & Yucheng Zhan, 2024. "Spatial Identification and Evaluation of Land Use Multifunctions and Their Interrelationships Improve Territorial Space Zoning Management in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yue Gao & Linyan Bai & Kefa Zhou & Yanfei Kou & Weiting Yuan & Xiaozhen Zhou & Ziyun Qiu & Dequan Zhao & Zhihong Lv & Qiulan Wu & Feng Zhang & Qing Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Coupling Coordination Degree and Driving Mechanism of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space in Ecologically Fragile Areas: A Case Study of the Turpan–Hami Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Menzori, Ivan Damasco & Sousa, Isabel Cristina Nunes de & Gonçalves, Luciana Márcia, 2021. "Urban growth management and territorial governance approaches: A master plans conformance analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    6. Liang Zheng & Yajing Wang & Hui Yang & Yuzhe Bi & Lei Xu & Ying Wang, 2024. "Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenhao Zhu & Jonah Susskind & Mario Giampieri & Hazel Backus O’Neil & Alan M. Berger, 2023. "Optimizing Sustainable Suburban Expansion with Autonomous Mobility through a Parametric Design Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Liang Zheng & Yajing Wang & Hui Yang & Yuzhe Bi & Lei Xu & Ying Wang, 2024. "Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Gulmira Abbas & Alimujiang Kasimu, 2023. "Characteristics of Land-Use Carbon Emissions and Carbon Balance Zoning in the Economic Belt on the Northern Slope of Tianshan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Xuanmiao Peng & Xiaoai Dai & Ryan Shi & Yujian Zheng & Xinyue Liu & Yuhe Xiao & Weile Li & Yang Zhang & Jue Wang & Huan Huang, 2024. "Investigating the Effects of Mining on Ecosystem Services in Panzhihua City: A Multi-Scenario Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Yunrui Yang & Jiaying Zhang & Yi’na Hu, 2024. "Land Use Intensity Alters Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand as Well as Their Interaction: A Spatial Zoning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Zidao Lu & Maomao Zhang & Chunguang Hu & Lianlong Ma & Enqing Chen & Cheng Zhang & Guozhen Xia, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Changes and Influencing Factors of the Coupled Production–Living–Ecological Functions in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Guoping Chen & Xiaohui Long & Chuntong Wu & Junsan Zhao, 2024. "Urban Spatial Pattern Optimization Based on “Double Evaluation”: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Kai Li & Ying Hou & Ruhong Xin & Yuejing Rong & Xiang Pan & Zihan Gao & Ting Wang & Bingyang Lyu & Baimeng Guo & Haocheng Wang & Xi Li, 2024. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Health into Landscape Functional Zoning: A Case Study of the Jinan Southern Mountainous Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Hanwen Du & Zhanqi Wang & Haiyang Li & Chen Zhang, 2024. "Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Pattern Evolution and Decoupling Relationships of Land Use Functions Based on Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basi," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Blanca González-Méndez & Christina Scarpitti & Bo Yang & Joaquin Murrieta Saldivar & Irene Pineda & Guadalupe Peñúñuri & Eduardo Hinojosa Robles & Kassandra Soto Irineo & Ser, 2022. "Green Belt Implementation in Arid Lands through Soil Reconditioning and Landscape Design: The Case of Hermosillo, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Karakadzai, Thomas & Bandauko, Elmond & Chaeruka, Joel & Arku, Godwin, 2023. "Examining the conformance of development to local spatial plans amid rapid urbanisation in Harare, Zimbabwe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Feng, Xinhui & Wang, Sensen & Li, Yan & Yang, Jiayu & Lei, Kaige & Yuan, Weikang, 2024. "Spatial heterogeneity and driving mechanisms of carbon emissions in urban expansion areas: A research framework coupled with patterns and functions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Yang, Hao & Zou, Runyan & Hu, Yueming & Wang, Lu & Xie, Yingkai & Tan, Zhengxi & Zhu, Zhiqiang & Zhu, A.-Xing & Gong, Jianzhou & Mao, Xiaoyun, 2024. "Sustainable utilization of cultivated land resources based on "element coupling-function synergy" analytical framework: A case study of Guangdong, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Yafang Zhao & Jiafu Liu & Jie Zhang & Xiaonan Zhang & Hongbo Li & Fengjie Gao & Yucheng Zhan, 2024. "Spatial Identification and Evaluation of Land Use Multifunctions and Their Interrelationships Improve Territorial Space Zoning Management in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Yagi, Hironori & Yoshida, Shingo, 2024. "Persistence of sub-urban agriculture and landowners' behavior in the population declining phase: Case of the preferential tax treatment for rental farmland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Kaisu Kuusela & Jenni Partanen, 2022. "Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Ouyang, Xiao & Xu, Jun & Li, Jiayu & Wei, Xiao & Li, Yonghui, 2022. "Land space optimization of urban-agriculture-ecological functions in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    19. Yuxiang Zhang & Dongjie Guan & Xiujuan He & Boling Yin, 2022. "Simulation on the Evolution Trend of the Urban Sprawl Spatial Pattern in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Yanbo, Qu & Shilei, Wang & Yaya, Tian & Guanghui, Jiang & Tao, Zhou & Liang, Meng, 2023. "Territorial spatial planning for regional high-quality development – An analytical framework for the identification, mediation and transmission of potential land utilization conflicts in the Yellow Ri," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:430-:d:1594654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.