Author
Listed:
- Jie Yang
(Faculty of Geographical Science and Engineering, College of Geographical Sciences, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Jiashuo Zhang
(Faculty of Geographical Science and Engineering, College of Geographical Sciences, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Chenyang Li
(Faculty of Geographical Science and Engineering, College of Geographical Sciences, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Henan Urban and Rural Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450044, China)
- Jianhua Gao
(Faculty of Geographical Science and Engineering, College of Geographical Sciences, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Ministry of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)
Abstract
Against the backdrop of urban–rural integrated development, special ecological function zones, as spatial carriers with significant regional ecological value and rural development functions, are confronted with a striking conflict between ecological conservation and regional advancement. This contradiction is comprehensively reflected in the interactions among land use functions (LUFs) that differ in nature and intensity. Therefore, exploring the trade-off and synergy (TOS) among regional LUFs is not only of great significance for optimizing territorial spatial patterns and advancing rural revitalization but also provides scientific evidence for the differentiated administration of regional land use. Taking 185 townships in the Funiu Mountain area of China as research units, this study constructs a land use assessment system based on the ‘Production–Living–Ecological’ (PLE) framework, utilizing multi-source datasets from 2000 to 2020. Spearman correlation analysis, geographically weighted regression (GWR), and bivariate local spatial autocorrelation methods are employed to examine the spatio-temporal dynamics of LUFs and the spatial non-stationarity of their TOSs. The findings indicate that, throughout the research period, the production function (PF) displayed a fluctuating declining trend, whereas the living function (LF) and ecological function (EF) demonstrated a fluctuating increasing trend. Notably, EF held an absolute dominant position in the overall structure of LUFs. This is highly consistent with the region’s positioning as a special ecological function zone and also a direct reflection of the effectiveness of continuous ecological construction over the past two decades. Spatially, PF is stronger in southern, eastern, and northern low-altitude townships, correlating with higher levels of economic development; LF is concentrated around townships near county centers; and high EF values are clustered in the central and western areas, showing an opposite spatial pattern to PF and LF. A synergistic relationship is observed between PF and LF, while both PF and LF exhibit trade-offs with EF. The TOSs between different function changes demonstrate significant spatial non-stationarity: linear synergy was the primary type for PF-LF, PF-EF, and LF-EF combinations, but each combination exhibited unique spatial characteristics in terms of non-stationarity. Notably, towns identified as having different types of trade-off relationships in the study of spatial non-stationarity are key areas for township spatial governance and optimization. Through the allocation of regional resources and targeted policy tools, the functional relationships can be adjusted and optimized to attain sustainable land use.
Suggested Citation
Jie Yang & Jiashuo Zhang & Chenyang Li & Jianhua Gao, 2025.
"Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Land Use Functions at the Township Scale in Special Ecological Functional Zones,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1812-:d:1743210
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1812-:d:1743210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.