IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p385-d1589547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ANCHOR: An Opportunity to Change Landscape Connectivity Networks and Conservation Delivery At-Scale in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Bridgett E. Costanzo

    (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Richmond, VA 23229, USA)

  • E. Jean Brennan

    (Independent Researcher, Auberry, CA 93602, USA)

  • Elissa M. Olimpi

    (Conservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, CA 96161, USA)

  • Justin P. Suraci

    (Conservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, CA 96161, USA)

Abstract

Connectivity modeling has been a tool available to the conservation community since the 1980s that guides our responses to habitat fragmentation. While the sophistication of computer modeling continues to grow, on-the-ground delivery remains challenging and lacks urgency. We present an approach to scale up delivery and do so within effective timeframes. The approach, termed ANCHOR (Areawide Networks to Connect Habitat and Optimize Resiliency), is grounded in connectivity science but executed in a manner that is flexible, expandable, and measurable. ANCHOR goes beyond the traditional protected area focus for establishing connected biomes to maximize the contributions of existing public lands and expand private landowner participation. The approach is applied using an umbrella species to represent a faunal group and/or multiple taxa to deliver co-benefits of landscape connectivity. Public lands receive connectivity rankings that are then used to engage potential connectivity partners who commit land units and collectively monitor improvements in habitat quality and landscape resiliency. The ANCHOR approach can guide unprecedented participation across agencies and departments to create public lands networks, while private and corporate lands establish landscape connections. To illustrate the approach, we present an example of native grasslands conservation in the central and eastern U.S. and an emerging partnership with the Department of Defense.

Suggested Citation

  • Bridgett E. Costanzo & E. Jean Brennan & Elissa M. Olimpi & Justin P. Suraci, 2025. "ANCHOR: An Opportunity to Change Landscape Connectivity Networks and Conservation Delivery At-Scale in the U.S," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:385-:d:1589547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Pacifici & Carlo Rondinini & Jonathan R. Rhodes & Andrew A. Burbidge & Andrea Cristiano & James E. M. Watson & John C. Z. Woinarski & Moreno Di Marco, 2020. "Global correlates of range contractions and expansions in terrestrial mammals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Kimberly R. Hall & Ranjan Anantharaman & Vincent A. Landau & Melissa Clark & Brett G. Dickson & Aaron Jones & Jim Platt & Alan Edelman & Viral B. Shah, 2021. "Circuitscape in Julia: Empowering Dynamic Approaches to Connectivity Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurdan Erdoğan, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Habitat Quality and Connectivity in Response to Land Use/Cover Change: A Case Study of İzmir," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Megan K. Jennings & Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca L. Lewison, 2021. "Dynamic Landscape Connectivity Special Issue Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-2, May.
    3. Weerasena, Lakmali & Shier, Douglas & Tonkyn, David & McFeaters, Mark & Collins, Christopher, 2023. "A sequential approach to reserve design with compactness and contiguity considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    4. Ekaterina Dolbunova & Alexandre Lucquin & T. Rowan McLaughlin & Manon Bondetti & Blandine Courel & Ester Oras & Henny Piezonka & Harry K. Robson & Helen Talbot & Kamil Adamczak & Konstantin Andreev & , 2023. "The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 171-183, February.
    5. Erin K. Buchholtz & Michael S. O’Donnell & Julie A. Heinrichs & Cameron L. Aldridge, 2023. "Temporal Patterns of Structural Sagebrush Connectivity from 1985 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:385-:d:1589547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.