IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p380-d1589022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active Tourism and Intermodality: Railway Stations as Soft Mobility Hubs—An Assessment Framework for Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Senes

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Paolo Stefano Ferrario

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Federico Riva

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Natalia Fumagalli

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Denise Corsini

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Anna Donati

    (Alleanza Mobilità Dolce—AMODO, 00100 Rome, Italy)

  • Luigi Contestabile

    (Rete Ferroviaria Italiana, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefano Fondi

    (Rete Ferroviaria Italiana, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Roberto Rovelli

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Since tourism involves the movement of people, mobility and tourism are deeply interconnected, with mutual growth dynamics but also shared negative effects, such as greenhouse gas emissions. Among the wide spectrum of policies and strategies for making tourism sustainable, soft mobility has gained increasing importance, becoming more and more a widespread form of active tourism, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. A sustainable approach, aimed at maintaining a balance between economic development and environmental protection, requires greater promotion of soft mobility and integration with rail transport. To make active tourism truly sustainable, the support of the railway network, a low-emission collective transport system, is needed, allowing people to reach destinations and move between destinations, taking advantage of intermodality. This needs the improvement of the connection between the two transport systems, the creation of services for visitors, and the organization of an appropriate railway service. Within this framework, the present work defines a methodology that, starting from the analysis of the relationships between railway stations, the soft mobility network, and attractions in the surrounding territory, allows us to identify stations that could serve as intermodal hubs for connecting local resources through soft mobility, according to a priority scale defined by the Soft Mobility HUB (SMH) Index. The methodology, applied to Italian railway stations, is based on the use of GIS (Geographic Information System) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), allowing a rigorous, transparent, and participatory approach. The proposed model, which is replicable in other contexts, has been effective in identifying, in different scenarios, the stations most suitable for becoming hubs for soft mobility. It can serve as a support tool for decision-makers to maximize investments by focusing on stations capable to provide the greatest contribution to the development of active and diversified tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Senes & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Federico Riva & Natalia Fumagalli & Denise Corsini & Anna Donati & Luigi Contestabile & Stefano Fondi & Roberto Rovelli, 2025. "Active Tourism and Intermodality: Railway Stations as Soft Mobility Hubs—An Assessment Framework for Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:380-:d:1589022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Brussel, Mark, 2022. "Understanding the effect of sociodemographic, natural and built environment factors on cycling accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Margherita Pazzini & Claudio Lantieri & Annalisa Zoli & Andrea Simone & Hocine Imine, 2023. "Evaluation of Railway Station Infrastructure to Facilitate Bike–Train Intermodality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Gabriella Mazzulla & Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti, 2021. "Cycling for a Sustainable Touristic Mobility: A Preliminary Study in an Urban Area of Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Ovidiu R. Ciascai & Ștefan Dezsi & Karina A. Rus, 2022. "Cycling Tourism: A Literature Review to Assess Implications, Multiple Impacts, Vulnerabilities, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Mara Ladu & Silvia Battino & Ginevra Balletto & Ainhoa Amaro García, 2023. "Green Infrastructure and Slow Tourism: A Methodological Approach for Mining Heritage Accessibility in the Sulcis-Iglesiente Bioregion (Sardinia, Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Seriani & Vicente Aprigliano & Álvaro Peña & Milenka Rubio & Bernardo Arredondo & Emilio Bustos & Iván Bastías & Felipe Gonzalez & Taku Fujiyama, 2024. "The Potential Carrying of Bicycles Inside the Train Carriage: An Experimental Pilot Study Based on Valparaíso Metro, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Cai, Yangqian & Moreno, Ana Tsui, 2024. "Identifying non-universal heterogeneity of preferences of leisure cyclists for rural highway environments: A latent-class model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Anna Gardzinska, 2024. "Cycling Tourism in Selected Baltic Sea Regions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1277-1286.
    4. Yiwei Bai & Yihang Bai & Ruoyu Wang & Tianren Yang & Xinyao Song & Bo Bai, 2023. "Exploring Associations between the Built Environment and Cycling Behaviour around Urban Greenways from a Human-Scale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Maria Elena Menconi & Rosaria Abbate & Giulia Ceccarelli & Anna Grassi & David Grohmann, 2023. "Rural Slow Routes as Connectors of Local Communities for the Promotion of Place Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Meijering, Louise & Weitkamp, Gerd, 2024. "‘I choose the quiet roads’: Everyday mobility in later life on the urban–rural continuum of the Northern Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Anita Konieczna & Kamil Roman & Witold Rzodkiewicz, 2023. "Fuel Consumption, Emissions of Air Pollutants and Opportunities for Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Linear Sources in the Model Rural Municipality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Caitriona Corr & Niamh Murphy & Barry Lambe, 2023. "Harnessing Systems Science and Co-Creation Techniques to Develop a Theory of Change towards Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Henrieta Pavolová & Tomáš Bakalár & Alexander Tokarčík & Iveta Cimboláková, 2024. "The Sustainable Management of Ecohotels for the Support of Ecotourism—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Karina A. Rus & Ștefan Dezsi & Ovidiu R. Ciascai, 2023. "Transformative Experiences in Cycling Tourism: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Antonella Senese & Manuela Pelfini & Davide Maragno & Irene Maria Bollati & Davide Fugazza & Luca Vaghi & Maurizio Federici & Luca Grimaldi & Piera Belotti & Paola Lauri & Carla Ferliga & Leonardo La , 2023. "The Role of E-Bike in Discovering Geodiversity and Geoheritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Mario Bentivenga & Eva Pescatore & Marco Piccarreta & Fabrizio Terenzio Gizzi & Nicola Masini & Salvatore Ivo Giano, 2024. "Geoheritage and Geoconservation, from Theory to Practice: The Ghost Town of Craco (Matera District, Basilicata Region, Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-39, March.
    13. Bernardo Valente & Eduardo Medeiros, 2022. "The Impacts of EU Cohesion Policy on Sustainable Tourism: The Case of POSEUR in Algarve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Sergej Gričar & Štefan Bojnec & Violeta Šugar, 2025. "Domestic Cycling Tourism: Double Pollution, Greenhushing, and Slovenian Sustainable Travel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Sergej Gričar & Urška Longar & Tanja Longar & Violeta Šugar, 2024. "Cycling into Sustainability: Lessons from the Netherlands for Slovenia’s E-Bike Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Agata Gajdek & Idalia Kasprzyk & Bernadetta Ortyl, 2024. "The Importance of Landscape during Long-Distance Running Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Aleksandar Šobot & Sergej Gričar & Violeta Šugar & Štefan Bojnec, 2024. "Sustainable Cycling: Boosting Commuting and Tourism Opportunities in Istria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Tongtong Zheng & Jinfeng Yu & Qian Cheng & Haiyin Pan, 2023. "The Influence Mechanism and Measurement of Tourists’ Authenticity Perception on the Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism—A Study Based on the 10 Most Popular Rural Tourism Destinations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Vasile-Gabriel Dascălu & Alexandra Grecu & Andreea Karina Gruia & Viorel Mihăilă & Cristian Constantin Drăghici, 2024. "The Role of Road Accessibility for Tourists in the Valorization of Archaeological Resources in the Dobrogea Region, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Juan Miguel Vega Naranjo & Montaña Jiménez-Espada & Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Rafael González-Escobar & Juan Pedro Cortés-Pérez, 2023. "Intercity Mobility Assessment Facing the Demographic Challenge: A Survey-Based Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:380-:d:1589022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.