IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p373-d1588572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Securing Land Tenure Through Participatory Upgrading Processes: Women’s Experiences in Freedom Square, Gobabis, Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Tanzila Ahmed

    (University of Stuttgart, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, MSc Integrated Urbanism and Sustainable Design, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Astrid Ley

    (University of Stuttgart, Institute of Urban Planning and Design, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Mohamed Salheen

    (Integrated Urbanism and Sustainable Design, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt)

  • Jennilee Kohima

    (Department of Architecture, Planning and Construction, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Windhoek 9000, Namibia)

Abstract

In Namibia, informal settlements are usually upgraded by a participatory process aimed at providing inhabitants with land tenure security through the Flexible Land Tenure Act (FLTA), followed by the provision of basic services. The pilot FLTA implementation case is the upgrading of the Freedom Square settlement in Gobabis, which was a woman-led process. This research analyzes both the experiences of the women participating during the process as well as the immediate and long-term perceived impacts on their social and economic conditions. The empirical data were collected through interviews and a focus group discussion with experts and key participants in the development process. The findings highlight socio–economic challenges faced by the participating women, including insufficient support from family and limited economic opportunities. Throughout the process, stakeholders shifted their aims. This shift influenced the involvement of women, changing their roles from active participants to service recipients. While the main goals of receiving land tenure and service provision were partially fulfilled, the long-term impact of the process on women is varied from how it was initially envisioned. This was largely due to the absence of a comprehensive plan to improve their livelihoods. The results show that for participatory land tenure processes to become inclusive, a stronger gender-mainstreaming agenda becomes necessary. It also emphasizes holistic development planning as a key factor for long-term success.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanzila Ahmed & Astrid Ley & Mohamed Salheen & Jennilee Kohima, 2025. "Securing Land Tenure Through Participatory Upgrading Processes: Women’s Experiences in Freedom Square, Gobabis, Namibia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:373-:d:1588572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Gaynor Paradza & Walter Dachaga, 2019. "Differentiations in Women’s Land Tenure Experiences: Implications for Women’s Land Access and Tenure Security in Sub-Saharan Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marisa Balas & João Carrilho & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "The Fit for Purpose Land Administration Approach-Connecting People, Processes and Technology in Mozambique," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Shewakena Aytenfisu Abab & Feyera Senbeta & Tamirat Tefera Negash, 2023. "The Effect of Land Tenure Institutional Factors on Small Landholders’ Sustainable Land Management Investment: Evidence from the Highlands of Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Mengesha, Ayelech Kidie & Damyanovic, Doris & Mansberger, Reinfried & Agegnehu, Sayeh Kassaw & Stoeglehner, Gernot, 2021. "Reducing gender inequalities through land titling? The case of Gozamin Woreda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Buntinx, Ine & Crompvoets, Joep & Stöcker, Claudia & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2020. "Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Walter Dachaga & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Integrating Urban Land Tenure Security in Health Determinants: The Design of Indicators for Measuring Land Tenure Security and Health Relationships in Developing Country Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Gwaleba, Method Julius & Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene, 2020. "Participation in property formation: Insights from land-use planning in an informal urban settlement in Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Baslyd B. Nara & Monica Lengoiboni & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2020. "Implications of Customary Land Rights Inequalities for Food Security: A Study of Smallholder Farmers in Northwest Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2019. "Visually Hypothesising in Scientific Paper Writing: Confirming and Refuting Qualitative Research Hypotheses Using Diagrams," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Benjamin, Emmanuel O. & Ola, Oreoluwa & Sauer, Johannes & Buchenrieder, Gertrud, 2021. "Interaction between agroforestry and women's land tenure security in sub-Saharan Africa: A matrilocal perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Gaynor Paradza & Lebogang Mokwena & Walter Musakwa, 2020. "Could Mapping Initiatives Catalyze the Interpretation of Customary Land Rights in Ways that Secure Women’s Land Rights?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:373-:d:1588572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.