IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1186-d1447740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Changes in Livestock Numbers and Densities in the Selinco Region of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Guilin Xi

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Changhui Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Fangkun Ji

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Hongxin Huang

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yaowen Xie

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

A thorough understanding of the development process of grazing activities and an elucidation of their complex mechanisms are crucial for the formulation and adjustment of livestock management policies. In the Selinco region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of year-end livestock numbers and densities over the past 30 years. The results indicate a gradual decline in overall livestock numbers in the Selinco region during this period, with a notable decrease between 2004 and 2014, followed by stabilization. Notably, the number of yaks has significantly increased, whereas the numbers of sheep, goats, and horses have markedly decreased. Regarding livestock density, there is a spatial pattern of decrease from northwest to southeast, with the density order being Seni District > Bange County > Anduo County > Shenzha County > Nima County > Shuanghu County. Between 2004 and 2014, most counties experienced a significant decline in livestock density, exhibiting a trough–peak pattern. However, after 2014, a complex spatiotemporal dynamic emerged. Concerning driving factors, from 1990 to 2004, rural population and economic development were the primary influences on livestock density. After 2004, forage–livestock balance management policies, snowstorms, and fluctuations in livestock prices likely became the main influencing factors. Further detailed analysis of these factors is essential for developing more effective management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilin Xi & Changhui Ma & Fangkun Ji & Hongxin Huang & Yaowen Xie, 2024. "Characteristics of Changes in Livestock Numbers and Densities in the Selinco Region of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1186-:d:1447740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biglari, Tahereh & Maleksaeidi, Hamideh & Eskandari, Farzad & Jalali, Mohammad, 2019. "Livestock insurance as a mechanism for household resilience of livestock herders to climate change: Evidence from Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Ronald C. Faas & David Holland & Douglas Young, 1981. "Variations in Farm Size, Irrigation Technology and After-Tax Income: Implications for Local Economic Development," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(2), pages 213-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Samira Shayanmehr & Shida Rastegari Henneberry & Mahmood Sabouhi Sabouni & Naser Shahnoushi Foroushani, 2020. "Drought, Climate Change, and Dryland Wheat Yield Response: An Econometric Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Julio C. Vargas-Burgos & Marco Heredia-R & Yenny Torres & Laura Puhl & Biviana N. Heredia & Jhenny Cayambe & Julio Hernán-González & Alexandra Torres & Marcelo Luna & Theofilos Toulkeridis & Bolier To, 2023. "Livelihoods and Perceptions of Climate Change among Dairy Farmers in the Andes: Implications for Climate Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Günther Schauberger & Martin Schönhart & Werner Zollitsch & Stefan J. Hörtenhuber & Leopold Kirner & Christian Mikovits & Johannes Baumgartner & Martin Piringer & Werner Knauder & Ivonne Anders & Konr, 2021. "Economic Risk Assessment by Weather-Related Heat Stress Indices for Confined Livestock Buildings: A Case Study for Fattening Pigs in Central Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Qingyin Cai & Yulian Ding & Calum Tuvey & Yuehua Zhang, 2021. "The influence of past experience on farmers’ preferences for hog insurance products: a natural experiment and choice experiment in China," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(3), pages 399-421, July.
    6. Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam & Wu, Min & Alam, GM Monirul & Shouse, Roger C, 2020. "Livelihood resilience of riverine island dwellers in the face of natural disasters: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Dongli Wu & Shan He & Lingui Qin & Jingyue Feng & Yu Gao, 2024. "Role of Policy-Supported Hog Insurance in Promoting Green Total Factor Productivity: The Case of China during 2005–2021," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1186-:d:1447740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.