IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2023i1p46-d1311475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Governance Structures on the Distribution of Land Consolidation Benefits in Urban Areas: Case Studies in Ningbo, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenzheng Lu

    (China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
    School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
    Research Center for Urbanization and Spatial Governance, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yu Lv

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xiaoping Zhou

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yuzhe Wu

    (Research Center for Urbanization and Spatial Governance, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Department of Land Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiaokun Gu

    (China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
    School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of an urban-rural dual structure, governance structure significantly influences the fairness and sharing of land value increment profits from land consolidation in various regions. This paper develops a spatial-institutional analytical framework, reflects on the traditional government-led land quota planning management mechanism and advocates optimizing governance structures in land consolidation to facilitate urban-rural element flows and the sharing of land value increment profits. This paper selects two comprehensive land consolidation cases in the Fenghua District and Cixi City of Ningbo, representing government-led and village collective self-organized governance structures. The research shows that the Fenghua case adopts a government-led state-owned enterprise coordinated governance structure, which state-owned enterprises bear operational risks and the majority of profit sharing, while village collectives, as landowners, are insufficiently protected in benefit sharing. The Cixi case employs a government-embedded village-town governance structure, with the village collectives as the main operating body, allowing collective construction land to enter the market to ensure the sharing of community profits. Both governance structures promote the bidirectional flow of urban-rural land resource elements; the former significantly drives urban development, while the latter ensures better benefit sharing for village collectives. The research proposes that optimizing governance structures and improving land quota allocation mechanisms can further stimulate various entities’ participation in land consolidation and land value activation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenzheng Lu & Yu Lv & Xiaoping Zhou & Yuzhe Wu & Xiaokun Gu, 2023. "The Impact of Governance Structures on the Distribution of Land Consolidation Benefits in Urban Areas: Case Studies in Ningbo, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:46-:d:1311475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ge & Li, Xiaoqiu & Gao, Yingjie & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Bingkun & Li, Xiangyu & Li, Xintong, 2023. "How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:46-:d:1311475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.