IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1247-d1173842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Change and Its Impact on Ecological Risk in the Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Huaijun Wang

    (School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an 223300, China
    Research Institute of Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt, Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities, Huai’an 223300, China)

  • Ru Feng

    (School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an 223300, China
    Research Institute of Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt, Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities, Huai’an 223300, China)

  • Xinchuan Li

    (School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an 223300, China
    Research Institute of Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt, Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities, Huai’an 223300, China)

  • Yaxue Yang

    (School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an 223300, China
    Research Institute of Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt, Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities, Huai’an 223300, China)

  • Yingping Pan

    (School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an 223300, China
    Research Institute of Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt, Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities, Huai’an 223300, China)

Abstract

Exploring the landscape ecological security pattern and its driving mechanisms in key economic zones is of great significance for preventing and resolving landscape ecological risks and promoting regional sustainable development. This study quantitatively analyzed the land use change characteristics in the Huaihe River Eco-economic Belt from 1980 to 2020 using the land use transfer matrix and land use intensity index. Further, the evolution of ecological risks and their driving mechanisms were investigated using the landscape pattern index and hierarchical partitioning analysis. The results show that (1) in terms of absolute area, dryland, grassland, and paddy land decreased by 7075 km 2 , 2708 km 2 , and 1874 km 2 , respectively, while urban–rural land and water area increased by 10,538 km 2 and 1336 km 2 , respectively. In terms of change intensity, grassland, water area, urban–rural land, and unused land exhibited the most dramatic change, whereas forest land, paddy land, and dryland exhibited weaker change. (2) The conversions in the study area were primarily between dryland, paddy land, and urban–rural land. Paddy land and dryland tended to convert to urban–rural land, which is further likely to be transformed into dryland and unused land when converted. (3) The study area mainly presented medium to low ecological risk. Overall, the ecological risk remained stable throughout the study period. Nevertheless, Jining, Zaozhuang, and Bengbu show high ecological risks in the construction of the economic zone. (4) Forest land explained 40% of the variance in landscape risk, whereas urban–rural land and dryland each explained 20% of the variance. An increase in the proportion of urban–rural land and dryland will increase landscape ecological risk. However, after urban–rural land exceeds 15%, the ecological security risk does not increase significantly with increasing proportion of urban–rural land.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaijun Wang & Ru Feng & Xinchuan Li & Yaxue Yang & Yingping Pan, 2023. "Land Use Change and Its Impact on Ecological Risk in the Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1247-:d:1173842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1247/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1247/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian Liang & Fei Yang & Dan Huang & Yinchen Luo & You Wu & Chuanhao Wen, 2022. "Land-Use Transformation and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Tim Newbold & Lawrence N. Hudson & Samantha L. L. Hill & Sara Contu & Igor Lysenko & Rebecca A. Senior & Luca Börger & Dominic J. Bennett & Argyrios Choimes & Ben Collen & Julie Day & Adriana De Palma, 2015. "Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7545), pages 45-50, April.
    3. Jialin Li & Ruiliang Pu & Hongbo Gong & Xu Luo & Mengyao Ye & Baixiang Feng, 2017. "Evolution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risk Patterns in Coastal Zones in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxin Qi & Yuandong Hu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors Analysis of Habitat Quality: A Case Study in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Tao Hong & Ningli Liang & Haomeng Li, 2023. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” in Changfeng County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Yutong Zhang & Wei Zhou & Danxue Luo, 2023. "The Relationship Research between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth: From Multi-Level Attempts to Key Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Law, Elizabeth A. & Macchi, Leandro & Baumann, Matthias & Decarre, Julieta & Gavier-Pizarro, Gregorio & Levers, Christian & Mastrangelo, Matías E. & Murray, Francisco & Müller, Daniel & Piquer-Rodrígu, 2021. "Fading opportunities for mitigating agriculture-environment trade-offs in a south American deforestation hotspot," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 262.
    5. Mohamed Fomba & Zinash Delebo Osunde & Souleymane Sidi Traoré & Appollonia Okhimamhe & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2024. "Urban Green Spaces in Bamako and Sikasso, Mali: Land Use Changes and Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Baldini, Carolina & Marasas, Mariana Edith & Tittonell, Pablo & Drozd, Andrea Alejandra, 2022. "Urban, periurban and horticultural landscapes – Conflict and sustainable planning in La Plata district, Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Xiaoliang Shi & Fei Chen & Hao Ding & Mengqi Shi & Yi Li, 2022. "Assessing Vegetation Ecosystem Resistance to Drought in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    10. Li Li & Xiaoping Zhou & Lan Yang & Jinglong Duan & Zhuo Zeng, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Ecological Risk in China’s North–South Transition Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Shuangshuang Liu & Qipeng Liao & Mingzhu Xiao & Dengyue Zhao & Chunbo Huang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Peng Tian & Luodan Cao & Jialin Li & Ruiliang Pu & Hongbo Gong & Changda Li, 2020. "Landscape Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Multi-Scenario Simulations: A Case Study of Yancheng Coastal Wetland, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Hu Liao & Hu Li & Chen-Song Duan & Xin-Yuan Zhou & Qiu-Ping Luo & Xin-Li An & Yong-Guan Zhu & Jian-Qiang Su, 2022. "Response of soil viral communities to land use changes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Karlsson, Johan O. & Röös, Elin, 2019. "Resource-efficient use of land and animals—Environmental impacts of food systems based on organic cropping and avoided food-feed competition," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 63-72.
    15. Di Liu & Xiaoying Liang & Hai Chen & Hang Zhang & Nanzhao Mao, 2018. "A Quantitative Assessment of Comprehensive Ecological Risk for a Loess Erosion Gully: A Case Study of Dujiashi Gully, Northern Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Gyanendra Prasad Joshi & Fayadh Alenezi & Gopalakrishnan Thirumoorthy & Ashit Kumar Dutta & Jinsang You, 2021. "Ensemble of Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Remote Sensing Image Classification Model on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Nobel, Anne & Lizin, Sebastien & Malina, Robert, 2023. "What drives the designation of protected areas? Accounting for spatial dependence using a composite marginal likelihood approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Hanwen Zhang & Yanqing Lang, 2022. "Quantifying and Analyzing the Responses of Habitat Quality to Land Use Change in Guangdong Province, China over the Past 40 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Jan-Philipp Sasse & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2023. "A low-carbon electricity sector in Europe risks sustaining regional inequalities in benefits and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Nele Lohrum & Morten Graversgaard & Chris Kjeldsen, 2021. "Historical Transition of a Farming System towards Industrialization: A Danish Agricultural Case Study Comparing Sustainability in the 1840s and 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1247-:d:1173842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.