IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1205-d1167823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Needs Hierarchy for Public Service Facilities and Guidance-Control Programming in Small Chinese Towns Influenced by Complex Urbanization of Residents: The Evidence from Zhejiang

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Qiu

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.)

  • Yue Wang

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    The Architectural Design and Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co, Ltd., Hangzhou 310027, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.)

  • Jie Wang

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Zhu Wang

    (Institute of Architectural Design and Theoretical Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yi Zhou

    (Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy & Hydro-Electric Power Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310002, China)

Abstract

Due to the rapid urbanization of China, residential areas and residents in small towns exhibit dual and complex urbanization patterns and characteristics. The “one-size-fits-all” approach to programming public service facilities has led to inefficient use of idle facilities and the frequent use of facilities that are not integrated into the public service system. Therefore, an investigation of programming logic based on residents’ needs within the complex urbanization patterns and characteristics of small towns is urgently required. This study distinguishes between rural and nonrural facilities, using the Kano model to evaluate residents’ hypothetical satisfaction with the provision of facilities or lack thereof. Based on the “rural and nonrural” facility need coupling model, four stages of urbanization were identified. Using the Better–Worse coefficient and the chi-square test, this study analyzes residents’ cognitive needs and population attributes across various stages of urbanization. Moreover, the study examines the “residential area–resident facility” matching relationship. Ultimately, a “required + optional item” public service facility guidance-control system based on the matching of human–land urbanization is proposed to improve the current programming system for public service facilities. This system provides a theoretical basis for improving the public service level in small towns and ensuring optimally relevant regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Qiu & Yue Wang & Jie Wang & Zhu Wang & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Needs Hierarchy for Public Service Facilities and Guidance-Control Programming in Small Chinese Towns Influenced by Complex Urbanization of Residents: The Evidence from Zhejiang," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1205-:d:1167823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lifang Qiao & Yichuan Zhang, 2022. "Analysis of MOOC Quality Requirements for Landscape Architecture Based on the KANO Model in the Context of the COVID-19 Epidemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Karen Puren & Vera Roos & Hendri Coetzee, 2018. "Sense of place: using people’s experiences in relation to a rural landscape to inform spatial planning guidelines," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 16-36, January.
    3. David Kaufmann & Stefan Wittwer, 2019. "Business centre or bedroom community? The development of employment in small and medium-sized towns," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 1483-1493, October.
    4. Yi Hua & Zhi Qiu & Wenjing Luo & Yue Wang & Zhu Wang, 2021. "Correlation between Elderly Migrants’ Needs and Environmental Adaptability: A Discussion Based on Human Urbanization Features," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Yu Zhu, 2000. "In Situ Urbanization in Rural China: Case Studies from Fujian Province," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 31(2), pages 413-434, March.
    6. Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueyi Wang & Taiyi He & Ke Li, 2023. "Regional Population and Public Services under the Framework of Sustainable Development: Evidence from a Typical High-Tech Zone in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    2. Yitian Ren, 2023. "Rural China Staggering towards the Digital Era: Evolution and Restructuring," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Bryan Jones & Deborah Balk & Stefan Leyk, 2020. "Urban Change in the United States, 1990–2010: A Spatial Assessment of Administrative Reclassification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Partha Mukhopadhyay & Marie‐Hélène Zérah & Eric Denis, 2020. "Subaltern Urbanization: Indian Insights for Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 582-598, July.
    6. Chengchao Wang & Yaoqi Zhang & Yecheng Xu & Qichun Yang, 2015. "Is the “Ecological and Economic Approach for the Restoration of Collapsed Gullies” in Southern China Really Economic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Wang, Chengchao & Gao, Bidan & Weng, Zudeng & Tian, Ying, 2020. "Primary causes of total hamlet abandonment for different types of hamlets in remote mountain areas of China: A case study of Shouning County, Fujian Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Clerici Maria Antonietta, 2020. "Unity in Variety. Employment Dynamics and Specialisation Profiles of Medium-Sized Towns in the Asti-Rovigo Area, Italy (2001–2017)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(4), pages 5-22, December.
    9. Jihong Li & Rongxu Qiu & Kaiming Li & Wei Xu, 2018. "Informal Land Development on the Urban Fringe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Yazhu Wang & Hui Zou & Xuejun Duan & Lingqing Wang, 2022. "Coordinated Evolution and Influencing Factors of Population and Economy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Debrunner, Gabriela & Kaufmann, David, 2023. "Land valuation in densifying cities: The negotiation process between institutional landowners and municipal planning authorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Bernadett Csurgó & Melanie K. Smith, 2022. "Cultural Heritage, Sense of Place and Tourism: An Analysis of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Rural Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Rongxu Qiu & Wei Xu & John Zhang & Karl Staenz, 2018. "Modeling and simulating industrial land-use evolution in Shanghai, China," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-83, January.
    14. Xiao Gong & Xiaolin Zhang & Jieyi Tao & Hongbo Li & Yunrui Zhang, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Development Performance of Small County Towns and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Small Towns in Jiangyin City in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Daniel Abramson, 2011. "Transitional Property Rights and Local Developmental History in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 553-568, February.
    16. Yanxu Li & Zhenfa Xie & Bo Li & Muhammad Mohiuddin, 2022. "The Impacts of In Situ Urbanization on Housing, Mobility and Employment of Local Residents in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Xubei Luo & Nong Zhu, 2020. "Hub-Periphery Development Pattern and Inclusive Growth: Case Study of Guangdong Province," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-39, CIRANO.
    18. Xingjian Liu & Ben Derudder & Mingshu Wang, 2018. "Polycentric urban development in China: A multi-scale analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(5), pages 953-972, September.
    19. Marie Hubatova & James McGinlay & David J. Parsons & Joe Morris & Anil R. Graves, 2023. "Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Fiona F Yang & Anthony G O Yeh, 2013. "Spatial Development of Producer Services in the Chinese Urban System," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 159-179, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1205-:d:1167823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.