IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p729-d1105288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acknowledging Landscape Connection: Using Sense of Place and Cultural and Customary Landscape Management to Enhance Landscape Ecological Theoretical Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Pearson

    (Farmed Landscape Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

  • Julian Gorman

    (School of People, Environment and Planning, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

Abstract

Landscapes are important socio-ecological systems. They are widely researched through landscape ecology to aid conservation and environmental management efforts, yet these efforts are not always as successful as they could be in terms of on-the-ground impact. Increasingly when considering conservation, it is being recognized that indigenously managed landscapes have slower rates of biodiversity loss and better environmental outcomes. Local knowledge and connection to the landscape can play a significant part in successfully managing these landscapes. Acknowledging that stewardship of the landscape is more effective when people are a part of the landscape with deep-rooted connection to place is important for understanding the significance of traditional ecological knowledge and the implementation of indigenous-led action. It has also been shown that researchers who have a stronger sense of place and connection to landscapes can also drive initiatives that have better environmental outcomes. This means that human connections to landscapes are important for management strategies, and a better understanding of the human cognition of landscapes is necessary in landscape ecological theoretical frameworks. This review paper explores literature that acknowledges cultural perspectives and cognition of landscapes and how this relates to landscape ecology. It makes recommendations about how landscape ecology can contribute towards better on-the-ground outcomes by embracing more effective mechanisms of collaboration and participation to incorporate local and indigenous knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Pearson & Julian Gorman, 2023. "Acknowledging Landscape Connection: Using Sense of Place and Cultural and Customary Landscape Management to Enhance Landscape Ecological Theoretical Frameworks," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:729-:d:1105288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Turnhout & Bob Bloomfield & Mike Hulme & Johannes Vogel & Brian Wynne, 2012. "Listen to the voices of experience," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7412), pages 454-455, August.
    2. Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Gloria Polinesi & Francesco Chelli & Luca Salvati & Leonardo Bianchini & Alvaro Marucci & Andrea Colantoni, 2022. "Found in Complexity, Lost in Fragmentation: Putting Soil Degradation in a Landscape Ecology Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Portia Adade Williams & Likho Sikutshwa & Sheona Shackleton, 2020. "Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches—Lessons from a Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    3. P. Marijn Poortvliet & Meredith T. Niles & Jeroen A. Veraart & Saskia E. Werners & Fiona C. Korporaal & Bob C. Mulder, 2020. "Communicating Climate Change Risk: A Content Analysis of IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Honeck, Erica & Gallagher, Louise & von Arx, Bertrand & Lehmann, Anthony & Wyler, Nicolas & Villarrubia, Olga & Guinaudeau, Benjamin & Schlaepfer, Martin A., 2021. "Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking – A case study on the use of boundary organizations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    5. Esther Reith & Elizabeth Gosling & Thomas Knoke & Carola Paul, 2020. "How Much Agroforestry Is Needed to Achieve Multifunctional Landscapes at the Forest Frontier?—Coupling Expert Opinion with Robust Goal Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Alejandro Esguerra & Sandra van der Hel, 2021. "Participatory Designs and Epistemic Authority in Knowledge Platforms for Sustainability," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 130-151, Winter.
    7. Paulina G. Karimova & Kuang-Chung Lee, 2022. "An Integrated Landscape–Seascape Approach in the Making: Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Partnership for Socio-Ecological Revitalisation in Eastern Coastal Taiwan (2016–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Josep Espluga-Trenc & Laura Calvet-Mir & Daniel López-García & Marina Di Masso & Ariadna Pomar & Guillem Tendero, 2021. "Local Agri-Food Systems as a Cultural Heritage Strategy to Recover the Sustainability of Local Communities. Insights from the Spanish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Hanna Erixon Aalto & Lars Marcus & Jonas Torsvall, 2018. "Towards a Social-Ecological Urbanism: Co-Producing Knowledge through Design in the Albano Resilient Campus Project in Stockholm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    10. D. Daniel & S. Satriani & Sefriyani Lea Zudi & Anjana Ekka, 2022. "To What Extent Does Indigenous Local Knowledge Support the Social–Ecological System? A Case Study of the Ammatoa Community, Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Eilola, Salla & Käyhkö, Niina & Fagerholm, Nora, 2021. "Lessons learned from participatory land use planning with high-resolution remote sensing images in Tanzania: Practitioners' and participants’ perspectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Ramūnas Povilanskas & Aistė Jurkienė & Inga Dailidienė & Raimonds Ernšteins & Alice Newton & María Esther Leyva Ollivier, 2024. "Circles of Coastal Sustainability and Emerald Growth Perspectives for Transitional Waters under Human Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Thobani Cele & Maxwell Mudhara, 2024. "Impacts of Crop Production and Value Chains on Household Food Insecurity in Kwazulu-Natal: An Ordered Probit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Nicola Favretto & Sheona Shackleton & Susannah M. Sallu & Tali Hoffman, 2021. "Editorial for Special Issue: “Collaboration and Multi-Stakeholder Engagement in Landscape Governance and Management in Africa: Lessons from Practice”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-5, March.
    15. David García-del-Amo & P. Graham Mortyn & Victoria Reyes-García, 2020. "Including indigenous and local knowledge in climate research: an assessment of the opinion of Spanish climate change researchers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 67-88, May.
    16. Krott, Max & Giessen, Lukas, 2014. "Learning from practices — implications of the “practice based approach” for forest and environmental policy research," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 12-16.
    17. Noam Obermeister, 2020. "Tapping into science advisers’ learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Olgah Lerato Malapane & Walter Musakwa & Nelson Chanza & Verena Radinger-Peer, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Indigenous Knowledge from a Comparative African Perspective: 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Matsushita, Kyohei & Hori, Masakazu & Yamane, Fumihiro & Asano, Kota, 2023. "Incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into holistic watershed management: Fishery forests in Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    20. Meg Parsons & Lara Taylor & Roa Crease, 2021. "Indigenous Environmental Justice within Marine Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Indigenous Peoples’ Involvement in Marine Governance and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-33, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:729-:d:1105288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.