IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p458-d1065612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Actors’ Perspectives on Agroforestry’s Potential in North Eastern Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Litschel

    (Department of Forest Utilization and Timber Markets, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
    Department of Socioeconomics and Communication, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ferréol Berendt

    (Department of Forest Utilization and Timber Markets, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
    State Enterprise for Forestry and Timber, North Rhine-Westphalia, Forest Education Center, 59755 Arnsberg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hanna Wagner

    (Department of Forest Utilization and Timber Markets, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany)

  • Simon Heidenreich

    (Bauhaus Erde gGmbH, 12161 Berlin, Germany)

  • David Bauer

    (Habitat Unit, Institute for Architecture, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Martin Welp

    (Department of Socioeconomics and Communication, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany)

  • Tobias Cremer

    (Department of Forest Utilization and Timber Markets, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany)

Abstract

As a land use management system, agroforestry has environmental, economic and societal benefits over conventional agriculture or forestry. Important benefits of combining tree growth with agricultural crops and/or forage production systems include higher biodiversity through more diverse habitats, the control of runoff and soil erosion, the augmentation of soil water availability, the creation of microclimates, carbon sequestration and provision of a more diverse farm economy. As the climate changes, north eastern Germany is likely to be particularly prone to severe effects from droughts and wind erosion in the future. However, the area of land under agroforestry makes up less than 2% of the total agricultural area in Germany. Through qualitative interviews with key actors, this study analyzed the benefits of, potentials for and barriers to implementing agroforestry systems in the federal state of Brandenburg. Results showed that agroforestry systems have significant potential in relation to several benefits, particularly the mitigation of soil erosion and stabilization of microclimate regimes. Additionally, agroforestry has the potential to provide wood for energy production or material uses. Although a small but highly innovative and interlinked community exists, administrative barriers and high start-up costs currently hamper the transition from conventional agriculture to agroforestry systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Litschel & Ferréol Berendt & Hanna Wagner & Simon Heidenreich & David Bauer & Martin Welp & Tobias Cremer, 2023. "Key Actors’ Perspectives on Agroforestry’s Potential in North Eastern Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:458-:d:1065612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Ruppert & Martin Welp & Michael Spies & Niels Thevs, 2020. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Tree Shelterbelts on Agricultural Land in Rural Kyrgyzstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Justus G. V. van Ramshorst & Lukas Siebicke & Moritz Baumeister & Fernando E. Moyano & Alexander Knohl & Christian Markwitz, 2022. "Reducing Wind Erosion through Agroforestry: A Case Study Using Large Eddy Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Jana Krčmářová & Lukáš Kala & Alica Brendzová & Tomáš Chabada, 2021. "Building Agroforestry Policy Bottom-Up: Knowledge of Czech Farmers on Trees in Farmland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altanshagai Batmunkh & Agus Dwi Nugroho & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Global Challenges and Responses: Agriculture, Economic Globalization, and Environmental Sustainability in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. N. P. Hariram & K. B. Mekha & Vipinraj Suganthan & K. Sudhakar, 2023. "Sustainalism: An Integrated Socio-Economic-Environmental Model to Address Sustainable Development and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, July.
    3. Andis Bārdulis & Jānis Ivanovs & Arta Bārdule & Dagnija Lazdiņa & Dana Purviņa & Aldis Butlers & Andis Lazdiņš, 2022. "Assessment of Agricultural Areas Suitable for Agroforestry in Latvia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Min Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Yuge Wang & Ahmed Khairul Hasan & Quanxing Meng, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Ecological Property Rights to Trigger Farmers’ Investment Behavior—An Example of Confluence Area of Heihe Reservoir, Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:458-:d:1065612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.