IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p431-d1060240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Rainfall Simulator to Define the Effect of Soil Conservation Techniques on Soil Loss and Water Retention

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Stašek

    (Department of Landscape Water Conservation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 16629 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Josef Krása

    (Department of Landscape Water Conservation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 16629 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Mistr

    (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Žabovřeská 250, 15627 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Tomáš Dostál

    (Department of Landscape Water Conservation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 16629 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Devátý

    (Department of Landscape Water Conservation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 16629 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Tomáš Středa

    (Department of Crop Science, Breeding and Plant Medicine, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1665, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Mikulka

    (Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, 16100 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In the Czech Republic, the Universal Soil Loss Equation provides the basis for defining the soil protection strategy. Field rainfall simulators were used to define the actual cover-management factor values of the most extensively seeded crops in the Czech Republic. The second purpose was to assess rainfall-runoff ratio for different crops and management to contribute to the debate of water retention effectiveness during approaching climate change. The methodology focused on multi-seasonal measurements to cover the most important phenological phases. The rainfall intensity was 60 mm·h −1 for 30 min and a plot size of 16 m 2 . More than 380 rainfall simulation experiments provided data. Soil conservation techniques proved to have a significant effect on runoff reduction. Conventionally seeded maize can reduce the runoff ratio to around 50%. However, cover crops combined with reduced tillage or direct seeding can reduce the runoff ratio to 10–20% for ‘dry’ conditions and to 12–40% for ‘saturated’ conditions. Conventionally seeded maize on average loses 4.3 Mg·ha −1 per 30 min experiment. However, reduced tillage and direct seeding reduce soil loss to 0.6 and 0.16 Mg·ha −1 , respectively. A comparison with the original USDA values for maize showed that it is desirable to redefine the crop cover factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Stašek & Josef Krása & Martin Mistr & Tomáš Dostál & Jan Devátý & Tomáš Středa & Jan Mikulka, 2023. "Using a Rainfall Simulator to Define the Effect of Soil Conservation Techniques on Soil Loss and Water Retention," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:431-:d:1060240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ladislav Menšík & David Kincl & Pavel Nerušil & Jan Srbek & Lukáš Hlisnikovský & Vladimír Smutný, 2020. "Water Erosion Reduction Using Different Soil Tillage Approaches for Maize ( Zea mays L.) in the Czech Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Borrelli, Pasquale & Panagos, Panos, 2020. "An indicator to reflect the mitigating effect of Common Agricultural Policy on soil erosion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Vejchar & Jan Velebil & Karel Kubín & Jiří Bradna & Jan Malaťák, 2023. "The Effect of Reservoir Cultivation on Conventional Maize in Sandy-Loam Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Yuting Zhao & Yanfei Pu & Huilong Lin & Rong Tang, 2021. "Examining Soil Erosion Responses to Grassland Conversation Policy in Three-River Headwaters, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Antonio Vannucci & Maria Andreoli & Massimo Rovai, 2022. "Land Use Change and Disappearance of Hedgerows in a Tuscan Rural Landscape: A Discussion on Policy Tools to Revert This Trend," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Syed Riaz Ahmed & Zeba Ali & Iram Ijaz & Zafran Khan & Nimra Gul & Soha Pervaiz & Hesham F. Alharby & Daniel K. Y. Tan & Muhammad Sayyam Tariq & Maria Ghaffar & Amir Bibi & Khalid Rehman Hakeem, 2023. "Multi-Trait Selection of Quinoa Ideotypes at Different Levels of Cutting and Spacing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Jakub Elbl & Antonín Kintl & Martin Brtnický & Petr Širůček & Jiří Mezera & Vladimír Smutný & Jan Vopravil & Jiří Holátko & Igor Huňady & Vojtěch Lukas, 2023. "Assessment of the effect of optimised field plot size on the crop yield," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(10), pages 447-462.
    6. Jakub Elbl & Antonín Kintl & Martin Brtnický & Petr Širůček & Jiří Mezera & Vladimír Smutný & Jan Vopravil & Jiří Holátko & Igor Huňady & Vojtěch Lukas, . "Assessment of the effect of optimised field plot size on the crop yield," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    7. Nejc Bezak & Pasquale Borrelli & Matjaž Mikoš & Panos Panagos, 2022. "Outreach and Post-Publication Impact of Soil Erosion Modelling Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:431-:d:1060240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.