IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i11p1999-d1271822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Rural Settlements in Suburban Villages of Megacities under Policy Intervention: A Case Study of Dayu Village in Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiming Li

    (Department of Architecture, Shanghai Academy of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Kaishun Li

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Yong Liu

    (Department of Architecture, Shanghai Academy of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Liying Yue

    (Asian Demographic Research Institute, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Xiji Jiang

    (Architecture College, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

China’s distinct rural revitalization process has attracted global attention due to its impressive speed, massive scale, and policy interventions. A relatively limited amount of research has been conducted on how rural transition characteristics and policy mechanisms are interrelated at the micro level. To fill this research gap, following the main research thread of dividing rural development stages, revealing transition characteristics and exploring policy mechanisms, this paper utilizes a participatory rural appraisal, a landscape metrics analysis, and in-depth interviews to analyze the spatial transition laws of Dayu Village. First, the results show that the village experienced three stages from 1990 to 2020: strict homestead control, village relocation, and land consolidation. Second, the village exhibits multidimensional transition characteristics. With a reduced rural settlement area, regular patch formation, and a dense interior subdivision of rural houses, the land use layout changed from homogeneous to multiple nests. As the industrial structure became more diversified, the villagers’ livelihoods became more differentiated. Inflows of tourists and migrants changed the population structure, causing social relations to become defamiliarized. Moreover, mechanism research finds that policy can promote rural settlement transition by allocating land resources and regulating village behavior. The policy’s scope expanded from a single settlement to the whole village, optimizing external forces, with village behavior effects acting as an internal force. The degree of matching between policy formulation and villagers’ needs is the key to promoting the transition of rural settlements. This research deepens the understanding of the transition laws of suburban villages in megacities in developing countries at the micro scale and provides a reference for land policies in similar villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiming Li & Kaishun Li & Yong Liu & Liying Yue & Xiji Jiang, 2023. "Transition Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Rural Settlements in Suburban Villages of Megacities under Policy Intervention: A Case Study of Dayu Village in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:1999-:d:1271822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/1999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/1999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluca Egidi & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Sirio Cividino & Giovanni Quaranta & Luca Salvati & Andrea Colantoni, 2020. "Rural in Town: Traditional Agriculture, Population Trends, and Long-Term Urban Expansion in Metropolitan Rome," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Jian Tian & Suiping Zeng & Jian Zeng & Sen Wang, 2022. "How Urban Expansion Triggers Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of Systemic Risk in Suburban Rural Areas: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Chengcheng Wang & Yanfang Liu & Xuesong Kong & Jiwei Li, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Decoupling between Population and Construction Land in Urban and Rural Hubei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Fangqin Yang & Jianwei Sun & Junchang Yang & Xiaojin Liang, 2023. "Expanded Residential Lands and Reduced Populations in China, 2000–2020: Patch-Scale Observations of Rural Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Patterns of revenue distribution in rural residential land consolidation in contemporary China: The perspective of property rights delineation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Adina Israel & Rachel Wynberg, 2019. "Multifunctional landscapes in a rural, developing country context: conflicts and synergies in Tshidzivhe, South Africa," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 404-417, May.
    7. Zhang, Yingnan & Long, Hualou & Chen, Shuocun & Ma, Li & Gan, Muye, 2023. "The development of multifunctional agriculture in farming regions of China: Convergence or divergence?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Jianhui Dong & Wenju Yun & Kening Wu & Shaoshuai Li & Bingrui Liu & Qiaoyuan Lu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Cultivated Land from 2010 to 2020 in Long’an County, Karst Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Shirzad, Hossein & Barati, Ali Akbar & Ehteshammajd, Shaghayegh & Goli, Imaneh & Siamian, Narges & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Pour, Mahdad & Tan, Rong & Janečková, Kristina & Sklenička, Petr & Azadi,, 2022. "Agricultural land tenure system in Iran: An overview," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    5. Yuan-Wei Du & Yi-Pin Fan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Study across 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Yichi Zhang & Kai Xue & Huimin Cao & Yingen Hu, 2023. "The Non-Linear Relationship between the Number of Permanent Residents and the Willingness of Rural Residential Land Transfer: The Threshold Effect of per Capita Net Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Xiaodong Xu & Jingping Liu & Ning Xu & Wei Wang & Hui Yang, 2018. "Quantitative Study on the Evolution Trend and Driving Factors of Typical Rural Spatial Morphology in Southern Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Liuwen Liao & Enpu Ma & Hualou Long & Xiaojun Peng, 2022. "Land Use Transition and Its Ecosystem Resilience Response in China during 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. Biao Zhang & Dian Shao & Zhonghu Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Dynamic, Effect and Governance Policy of Construction Land Use in Urban Agglomeration: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, May.
    11. Mu Li & Yunyang Shi & Wenkai Duan & Aiqi Chen & Nan Wang & Jinmin Hao, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Decoupling of Population, Economy and Construction Land Changes in Hebei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Shi, Linna & Wang, Yongsheng, 2021. "Evolution characteristics and driving factors of negative decoupled rural residential land and resident population in the Yellow River Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Yajun Ma & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Yong Zhou & Sidong Zhao, 2022. "A Dynamic Performance and Differentiation Management Policy for Urban Construction Land Use Change in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, June.
    14. Yingchao Lin & Yongle Li & Zhili Ma, 2018. "Exploring the Interactive Development between Population Urbanization and Land Urbanization: Evidence from Chongqing, China (1998–2016)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Bingkui Qiu & Min Zhou & Yang Qiu & Shuhan Liu & Guoliang Ou & Chaonan Ma & Jiating Tu & Siqi Li, 2022. "An Integrated Spatial Autoregressive Model for Analyzing and Simulating Urban Spatial Growth in a Garden City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Simone Valeri & Laura Zavattero & Giulia Capotorti, 2021. "Ecological Connectivity in Agricultural Green Infrastructure: Suggested Criteria for Fine Scale Assessment and Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Supannika Lursinsap & Ruth Sirisunyaluck & Suraphol Sreshthaputra & Juthathip Chalermphol, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Chance of Inheriting the Family Farming Career among Heirs in the Upper Northern Region of Thailand in the Crisis of Farming Labor Decline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Shenzhen Tian & Bing Yang & Zhangli Liu & Xueming Li & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Coupling Coordination of Urban Pseudo and Reality Human Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Yaolin Liu & Enxiang Cai & Ying Jing & Jie Gong & Zhengyu Wang, 2018. "Analyzing the Decoupling between Rural-to-Urban Migrants and Urban Land Expansion in Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Antonio Tomao & Walter Mattioli & David Fanfani & Carlotta Ferrara & Giovanni Quaranta & Rosanna Salvia & Luca Salvati, 2021. "Economic Downturns and Land-Use Change: A Spatial Analysis of Urban Transformations in Rome (Italy) Using a Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:1999-:d:1271822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.