IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1352-d892609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Synergistic Development Potential between Tourism and Rural Restructuring Using a Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of Southern Shaanxi, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenli Jing

    (School of Architecture, Chang’an University, No. 161 Middle Chang’an Road, Yanta District, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Chang’an University, No. 161 Middle Chang’an Road, Yanta District, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Pingping Luo

    (School of Water & Environmental, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
    Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effects in Arid Region, Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Lian Wu

    (School of Architecture, Chang’an University, No. 161 Middle Chang’an Road, Yanta District, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (School of Architecture, Chang’an University, No. 161 Middle Chang’an Road, Yanta District, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Kanhua Yu

    (School of Architecture, Chang’an University, No. 161 Middle Chang’an Road, Yanta District, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

Tourism plays an important role in rural restructuring, especially in mountainous areas. Mismatches between tourism and rural in terms of the development level and efficiency have given rise to a variety of challenges. In order to achieve the orderly growth of tourism and sustainable rural restructuring, there is an urgent need to explore the interaction between the two. Thus, we introduce the concept of synergistic development potential (SDP) and construct an assessment framework using coupling analysis. Southern Shaanxi, in the Qin-Ba mountainous area, a Chinese region rich in ecological tourism resources, was selected as a case study to evaluate the SDP during the period 2013 to 2018. In our framework, a comprehensive index system with 21 indicators was developed to evaluate the tourism development levels (TDL) and rural development levels (RDL) in 2013 and 2018, and the tourism development efficiency (TDE) and rural restructuring efficiency (RRE) during this period. Secondly, correlations between TDL and RDL, as well as correlations between TDE and RDE, were quantified using the coupling coordination degree model (CCDM). Finally, the SDP evaluation model was constructed through combing the coupling coordination degrees of current development levels and development efficiencies. The case study results indicate that the primary-level coordination counties are both dominated in this region in terms of the relationship of development levels as well as the development efficiencies. Additionally, the SDP results show a significant difference in 25 counties, with 36% of them having low potential, 48% having medium potential, and 16% having high potential. This study could intuitively show the development differences among various units and provide theoretical and methodological support for the rural tourism zoning strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenli Jing & Wei Zhang & Pingping Luo & Lian Wu & Lei Wang & Kanhua Yu, 2022. "Assessment of Synergistic Development Potential between Tourism and Rural Restructuring Using a Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of Southern Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1352-:d:892609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luisa Spagnoli & Luigi Mundula, 2021. "Between Urban and Rural: Is Agricultural Parks a Governance Tool for Developing Tourism in the Periurban Areas? Reflections on Two Italian Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2021. "Tourism-led Commodification of Place and Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of Xixinan Village, Huangshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Tang, Zi, 2015. "An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-19.
    4. Chung, Min Gon & Dietz, Thomas & Liu, Jianguo, 2018. "Global relationships between biodiversity and nature-based tourism in protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 11-23.
    5. Gao, Jing & Wu, Bihu, 2017. "Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 223-233.
    6. Gao, Chunliu & Cheng, Li, 2020. "Tourism-driven rural spatial restructuring in the metropolitan fringe: An empirical observation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Su, Baoren, 2011. "Rural tourism in China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1438-1441.
    8. Juan Xu & Mengsheng Yang & Ziliang Lu & Dan Liu & Yan Wu, 2021. "Quality Analysis on Spatial Planning Pattern of Rural Area in Southern Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weiying Cai & Jie Yu & Wei Yang, 2023. "The Spatial Synergy of the Ice–Snow Tourism Industry and Its Related Industries in Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Beibei Hu & Airong Xu & Xianlei Dong, 2022. "Evaluating the Comprehensive Development Level and Coordinated Relationships of Urban Multimodal Transportation: A Case Study of China’s Major Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Shiqiao Fang & Kaihang Ou & Jing Xiong & Rongmei Teng & Lifang Han & Xufan Zhou & Hongyu Ma, 2023. "The coupling coordination between rural public services and rural tourism and its causative factors: The case study of southwestern China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Qin Li & Shuangning Lv & Jingya Cui & Dongchen Hou & Yijun Liu & Wenlong Li, 2024. "Sustainability Constraints on Rural Road Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Geng, Yuqing & Zhang, Xiaorui & Gao, Juan & Yan, Yan & Chen, Lingyan, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis of sustainable tourism using CiteSpace," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Kuat Saparov & Miroslava Omirzakova & Aigul Yeginbayeva & Aigul Sergeyeva & Kairat Saginov & Gulnash Askarova, 2024. "Assessment for the Sustainable Development of Components of the Tourism and Recreational Potential of Rural Areas of the Aktobe Oblast of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Hai Xiao & Jiahao Yu & Yifan Zhang & Chuliang Xin & Jiangjun Wan & Xiaohong Tang, 2024. "Coupling Coordination Analysis of County Tourism Development and Multidimensional Poverty Based on Nighttime Light Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Yi Cong & Yanxia Zhai & Yubo Dong & Zhilong Zhao & Guang Yang & Hejiang Shen, 2024. "The Influence of Tourism’s Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity on the Urban–Rural Relationship: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianzhuang Zheng & Lingyan Huang, 2022. "Characterizing the Spatiotemporal Patterns and Key Determinants of Homestay Industry Agglomeration in Rural China Using Multi Geospatial Datasets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Nanping Feng & Fenfen Wei & Kevin H. Zhang & Dongxiao Gu, 2018. "Innovating Rural Tourism Targeting Poverty Alleviation through a Multi-Industries Integration Network: the Case of Zhuanshui Village, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Bi, Guohua & Yang, Qingyuan, 2023. "The spatial production of rural settlements as rural homestays in the context of rural revitalization: Evidence from a rural tourism experiment in a Chinese village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Christou, P. & Hadjielias, E. & Farmaki, A., 2019. "Reconnaissance of philanthropy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Keke Sun & Zeyu Xing & Xia Cao & Weijia Li, 2021. "The Regime of Rural Ecotourism Stakeholders in Poverty-Stricken Areas of China: Implications for Rural Revitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Chen Che & Bonhak Koo & Jiatong Wang & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Heesup Han, 2021. "Promoting Rural Tourism in Inner Mongolia: Attributes, Satisfaction, and Behaviors among Sustainable Tourists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Tie Wang & Wei Wang & Zhongjun Wu & Ching-Hui Su & Ming-Hsiang Chen, 2019. "Understanding Farm Households’ Participation in Nong Jia Le in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Keshuai Xu & Jin Zhang & Fengjun Tian, 2017. "Community Leadership in Rural Tourism Development: A Tale of Two Ancient Chinese Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Zirui Zhan & Jeremy Cenci & Jiazhen Zhang, 2022. "Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Chengkun Huang & Feiyang Lin & Deping Chu & Lanlan Wang & Jiawei Liao & Junqian Wu, 2021. "Coupling Relationship and Interactive Response between Intensive Land Use and Tourism Industry Development in China’s Major Tourist Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    12. Zaitul Zaitul & Ilona Desi & Novianti Neva, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    13. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Rural Development in China over the Past 40 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Dongchuan Wang & Wengang Chen & Wei Wei & Broxton W. Bird & Lihui Zhang & Mengqin Sang & Qianqian Wang, 2016. "Research on the Relationship between Urban Development Intensity and Eco-Environmental Stresses in Bohai Rim Coastal Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Min Gon Chung & Tao Pan & Xintong Zou & Jianguo Liu, 2018. "Complex Interrelationships between Ecosystem Services Supply and Tourism Demand: General Framework and Evidence from the Origin of Three Asian Rivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Jie Yin & Lili Zhao, 2024. "The Value Expression and Driving Factors of Rural Spatial Ecological Products: A Case Study of B&Bs in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Zumeng Zhang & Liping Ding & Yuxuan Zhu & Yin Shi & Qiyao Dai, 2024. "Does scientific and technological innovation promote regional coordination of socio-economy, environment, and energy? Evidence from quantitative research in China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 2735-2762, June.
    18. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Ali Akaak & Zoltán Lakner & Csaba Gyuricza & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Understanding the Complexity of Rural Tourism Business: Scholarly Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Rui Jun Qin & Ho Hon Leung, 2021. "Becoming a Traditional Village: Heritage Protection and Livelihood Transformation of a Chinese Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    20. Chiara Richiardi & Maria Rita Minciardi & Consolata Siniscalco & Maria Adamo, 2023. "Cumulative Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Anthropogenic Impacts in the Protected Area of the Gran Paradiso National Park in the NW Alps, Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1352-:d:892609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.