IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1135-d870358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneity-Based Management Restores Diversity and Alters Vegetation Structure without Decreasing Invasive Grasses in Working Mixed-Grass Prairie

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Duquette

    (Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA)

  • Devan Allen McGranahan

    (USDA-ARS, Livestock & Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301, USA)

  • Megan Wanchuk

    (Range Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA)

  • Torre Hovick

    (Range Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA)

  • Ryan Limb

    (Range Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA)

  • Kevin Sedivec

    (Range Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA)

Abstract

Non-native plants can reduce grassland biodiversity, degrade wildlife habitat, and threaten rural livelihoods. Management can be costly, and the successful eradication of undesirable species does not guarantee the restoration of ecosystem service delivery. An alternative to the eradication of invasive species in rangelands is to target the restoration of diversity and heterogeneous plant structure, which have direct links to ecosystem function. In this study, we evaluate patch-burn grazing (PBG) with one and two fires per year and variably stocked rotational grazing in Poa pratensis - and Bromus inermis -invaded grasslands using traditional (cover) and process-based (diversity and vegetation structural heterogeneity) frameworks in central North Dakota, USA. Within 3–4 years of initiating management, we found little evidence of decreased Poa pratensis and Bromus inermis cover compared to continuous grazing ( Poa pratensis F 3,12 = 0.662, p = 0.59; Bromus inermis F 3,12 = 0.13, p = 0.13). However, beta diversity increased over time in all treatments compared to continuous grazing (t PBG1 = 2.71, t PBG2 = 3.45, t Rotational = 3.72), and variably stocked rotational treatments had greater increases in spatial heterogeneity in litter depth and vegetation structure than continuously grazed pastures (t visual obstruction = 2.42, p = 0.03; t litter depth = 2.59, p = 0.02) over the same time period. Alternative frameworks that promote grassland diversity and heterogeneity support the restoration of ecological services and processes in invaded grasslands.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Duquette & Devan Allen McGranahan & Megan Wanchuk & Torre Hovick & Ryan Limb & Kevin Sedivec, 2022. "Heterogeneity-Based Management Restores Diversity and Alters Vegetation Structure without Decreasing Invasive Grasses in Working Mixed-Grass Prairie," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1135-:d:870358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David W Londe & R Dwayne Elmore & Craig A Davis & Samuel D Fuhlendorf & Torre J Hovick & Barney Luttbeg & Jimmy Rutledge & Jan Komdeur, 2021. "Fine-scale habitat selection limits trade-offs between foraging and temperature in a grassland bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(4), pages 625-637.
    2. J. Kruskal, 1964. "Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(1), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Edward J. Raynor & Devan Allen McGranahan & James R. Miller & Diane M. Debinski & Walter H. Schacht & David M. Engle, 2021. "Moderate Grazer Density Stabilizes Forage Availability More Than Patch Burning in Low-Stature Grassland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Dillon T. Fogarty & Caleb P. Roberts & Daniel R. Uden & Victoria M. Donovan & Craig R. Allen & David E. Naugle & Matthew O. Jones & Brady W. Allred & Dirac Twidwell, 2020. "Woody Plant Encroachment and the Sustainability of Priority Conservation Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Shepard, 1974. "Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 373-421, December.
    2. Giovanna Boccuzzo & Licia Maron, 2017. "Proposal of a composite indicator of job quality based on a measure of weighted distances," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2357-2374, September.
    3. Jong-Seok Lee & Dan Zhu, 2012. "Shilling Attack Detection---A New Approach for a Trustworthy Recommender System," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 117-131, February.
    4. Ján Kulfan & Lenka Sarvašová & Michal Parák & Marek Dzurenko & Peter Zach, 2018. "Can late flushing trees avoid attack by moth larvae in temperate forests?," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 272-283.
    5. Ma, Jie & Tse, Ying Kei & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Minhao, 2019. "Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – An empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 192-205.
    6. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    7. Ivan Mihál & Eva Luptáková & Martin Pavlík, 2021. "Wood-inhabiting macromycete communities in spruce stands on former agricultural land," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(2), pages 51-65.
    8. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    9. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    10. Marie Diekmann & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2019. "Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 733-746, December.
    11. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Jarmila Horváthová & Martina Mokrišová & Mária Vrábliková, 2021. "Benchmarking—A Way of Finding Risk Factors in Business Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Shiau, Wen-Lung & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Yang, Han Suan, 2017. "Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 390-399.
    14. Roderick McDonald, 1976. "A note on monotone polygons fitted to bivariate data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 543-546, December.
    15. D. V. Pahan Prasada, 2013. "Domestic versus Multilateral Institutions in Bilateral Trade: A Comparative Gravity Analysis," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 127-142, March.
    16. Phipps Arabie & J. Carroll, 1980. "Mapclus: A mathematical programming approach to fitting the adclus model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 211-235, June.
    17. Mark Davison, 1976. "Fitting and testing carroll's weighted unfolding model for preferences," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(2), pages 233-247, June.
    18. Malcolm Dow & Peter Willett & Roderick McDonald & Belver Griffith & Michael Greenacre & Peter Bryant & Daniel Wartenberg & Ove Frank, 1987. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 4(2), pages 245-278, September.
    19. Dionisios Koutsantonis & Konstantinos Koutsantonis & Nikolaos P. Bakas & Vagelis Plevris & Andreas Langousis & Savvas A. Chatzichristofis, 2022. "Bibliometric Literature Review of Adaptive Learning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Mark Davison, 1988. "A reformulation of the general Euclidean model for the external analysis of preference data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 305-320, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1135-:d:870358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.