IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p649-d803869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Nature-Based Solutions: Learnings, Methodological Challenges, and Perspectives from a Critical Analysis of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Pyrène Larrey-Lassalle

    (NOBATEK/INEF4, 67 rue de Mirambeau, 64600 Anglet, France)

  • Stéphanie Armand Decker

    (NOBATEK/INEF4, 67 rue de Mirambeau, 64600 Anglet, France)

  • Domenico Perfido

    (R2M Solution srl, Via Fratelli Cuzio n. 42, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Serkan Naneci

    (Ekodenge, Hacettepe Teknokent, 1.Ar-Ge Binası, No:18, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey)

  • Benedetto Rugani

    (RDI Unit on Environmental Sustainability Assessment and Circularity, Environmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41 Rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg)

Abstract

The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) allows work to go beyond the traditional scope of urban nature-based solutions (NBS), in which ecosystem services are provided to citizens, to include environmental impacts generated over the entire life cycle of the NBS, i.e., from raw material extraction, through materials processing, production, distribution, and use stages, to end-of-life management. In this work, we explored how LCA has been applied in the context of NBS through a critical analysis of the literature. Systems under review were not restricted to one typology of NBS or another, but were meant to cover a broad range of NBS, from NBS on the ground, water-related NBS, building NBS, to NBS strategies. In total, 130 LCA studies of NBS were analysed according to several criteria derived from the LCA methodology or from specific challenges associated with NBS. Results show that studies were based on different scopes, resulting in the selection of different functional units and system boundaries. Accordingly, we propose an innovative approach based on the ecosystem services (ES) concept to classify and quantify these functional units. We also identify and discuss two recent and promising approaches to solve multifunctionality that could be adapted for LCA of NBS.

Suggested Citation

  • Pyrène Larrey-Lassalle & Stéphanie Armand Decker & Domenico Perfido & Serkan Naneci & Benedetto Rugani, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Nature-Based Solutions: Learnings, Methodological Challenges, and Perspectives from a Critical Analysis of the Literature," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:649-:d:803869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golkowska, Katarzyna & Rugani, Benedetto & Koster, Daniel & Van Oers, Cor, 2016. "Environmental and economic assessment of biomass sourcing from extensively cultivated buffer strips along water bodies," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 31-39.
    2. Babí Almenar, Javier & Elliot, Thomas & Rugani, Benedetto & Philippe, Bodénan & Navarrete Gutierrez, Tomas & Sonnemann, Guido & Geneletti, Davide, 2021. "Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Callesen, Ingeborg, 2016. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle impact assessment – Inventory objects or impact categories?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 94-103.
    4. Maria R. C. De Sousa & Franco A. Montalto & Sabrina Spatari, 2012. "Using Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate Green and Grey Combined Sewer Overflow Control Strategies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(6), pages 901-913, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedetto Rugani & Philippe Osset & Olivier Blanc & Enrico Benetto, 2023. "Environmental Footprint Neutrality Using Methods and Tools for Natural Capital Accounting in Life Cycle Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Elena Di Pirro & Peter Roebeling & Lorenzo Sallustio & Marco Marchetti & Bruno Lasserre, 2023. "Cost-Effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions under Different Implementation Scenarios: A National Perspective for Italian Urban Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Babí Almenar, Javier & Petucco, Claudio & Sonnemann, Guido & Geneletti, Davide & Elliot, Thomas & Rugani, Benedetto, 2023. "Modelling the net environmental and economic impacts of urban nature-based solutions by combining ecosystem services, system dynamics and life cycle thinking: An application to urban forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Kofi Armah Boakye-Yiadom & Alessio Ilari & Daniele Duca, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Life Cycle Assessment on the Black Soldier Fly ( Hermetia illucens L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-29, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rob Roggema & Nico Tillie & Greg Keeffe, 2021. "Nature-Based Urbanization: Scan Opportunities, Determine Directions and Create Inspiring Ecologies," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Rembrandt Koppelaar & Antonino Marvuglia & Lisanne Havinga & Jelena Brajković & Benedetto Rugani, 2021. "Is Agent-Based Simulation a Valid Tool for Studying the Impact of Nature-Based Solutions on Local Economy? A Case Study of Four European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Ronglei Yang & Zhongke Bai & Zeyu Shi, 2021. "Linking Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis and Circuit Theory to Identify Ecological Security Pattern in the Loess Plateau: Taking Shuozhou City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Gaspare D’Amico & Roberta Arbolino & Lei Shi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. D’Amico, Gaspare & Arbolino, Roberta & Shi, Lei & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2022. "Digitalisation driven urban metabolism circularity: A review and analysis of circular city initiatives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Aitziber Egusquiza & Maider Arana-Bollar & Amaia Sopelana & Javier Babí Almenar, 2021. "Conceptual and Operational Integration of Governance, Financing, and Business Models for Urban Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Charlesworth, S.M. & Faraj-Llyod, A.S. & Coupe, S.J., 2017. "Renewable energy combined with sustainable drainage: Ground source heat and pervious paving," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 912-919.
    10. Xiaoyan Ren & Yuhao Yang & Zongming Wang, 2023. "A Long-Term and Comprehensive Assessment of the Ecological Costs Arising from Urban Agglomeration Expansion in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Lisa A. Peterson & Patricia M. Awerbuch & Sabrina Spatari, 2021. "Environmental and economic implications of stormwater management alternatives in rural development," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 1076-1088, August.
    12. Elliot, T. & Torres-Matallana, J.A. & Goldstein, B. & Babí Almenar, J. & Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Proença, V. & Rugani, B., 2022. "An expanded framing of ecosystem services is needed for a sustainable urban future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Zhongming Lu & John Crittenden & Frank Southworth & Ellen Dunham-Jones, 2017. "An integrated framework for managing the complex interdependence between infrastructures and the socioeconomic environment: An application in metropolitan Atlanta," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2874-2893, September.
    14. Diana Dushkova & Annegret Haase & Manuel Wolff & Dagmar Haase, 2021. "Editorial for Special Issue “Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) in Cities and Their Interactions with Urban Land, Ecosystems, Built Environments and People: Debating Societal Implications”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-7, September.
    15. Ferrarini, Andrea & Serra, Paolo & Almagro, María & Trevisan, Marco & Amaducci, Stefano, 2017. "Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 277-290.
    16. Kavehei, Emad & Jenkins, G.A. & Adame, M.F. & Lemckert, C., 2018. "Carbon sequestration potential for mitigating the carbon footprint of green stormwater infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1179-1191.
    17. Francesco Alberti, 2023. "Regenerative Streets: Pathways towards the Post-Automobile City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Jonas Smit Andersen & Sara Maria Lerer & Antje Backhaus & Marina Bergen Jensen & Hjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup, 2017. "Characteristic Rain Events: A Methodology for Improving the Amenity Value of Stormwater Control Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Mengxue Liu & Hejie Wei & Xiaobin Dong & Xue-Chao Wang & Bingyu Zhao & Ying Zhang, 2022. "Integrating Land Use, Ecosystem Service, and Human Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, June.
    20. Venkatesh, G. & Chan, Arthur & Brattebø, Helge, 2014. "Understanding the water-energy-carbon nexus in urban water utilities: Comparison of four city case studies and the relevant influencing factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 153-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:649-:d:803869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.