IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1801-d942850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Pattern and Key Environmental Determinants of Vegetation in Sand Mining and Non-Mining Sites along the Panjkora River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Kishwar Ali

    (College of General Education, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Arab League Street, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

  • Nasrullah Khan

    (Department of Botany, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Chakdara P.O. Box 18800, Pakistan)

  • Rafi Ullah

    (Department of Botany, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Chakdara P.O. Box 18800, Pakistan)

  • Muzammil Shah

    (Department of Botany, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Chakdara P.O. Box 18800, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Ezaz Hasan Khan

    (College of General Education, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Arab League Street, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

  • David Aaron Jones

    (College of Health Sciences, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Arab League Street, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

  • Maha Dewidar

    (College of General Education, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Arab League Street, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

Abstract

A specific set of environmental conditions characterizes plant species patterns and distribution on Earth. Similarly, riparian vegetation can be impacted by anthropogenic activities like mining practices involving the removal of vegetation cover, which destroys the structure and diversity of the habitat, adversely affecting the ecosystem services. In this study, we explored the role of environmental variables and biotic intervention in deriving spatial patterns and distribution of riparian vegetation at mining and non-mining sites along the most depleted Panjkora River basin in NW Pakistan. Vegetation data and its determining factors at 28 mining and non-mining sites (14 each) were sampled using 10 m × 10 m (100 m 2 ) systematic plots at 50 m intervals along transects in a downstream direction from the upper catchments to the bottom junction with the Swat River. We recorded 186 species in both mining and non-mining sites, belonging to 70 families comprising 174 angiosperms, 3 gymnosperms, and 9 Pteridophytes. Results show that annual or perennial therophytic life forms predominated in the Panjkora River system, indicating anthropogenic disturbances. At the same time, the aggressively invasive species, such as Xanthium strumarium and Cannabis sativa, further heightened plant community disturbances. Generally, the species diversity was higher in non-mining sites and may be attributed to habitat fragmentation. Likewise, the Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA-ordination) revealed that geographic coordinate (i.e., latitude r = 0.80; longitude r = 0.75) and elevation ( r = 0.95) were more meaningful predictors than soil texture (i.e., silt%, r = −0.30), nutrients (i.e., potassium, r = −0.35; phosphorus, r = 0.38) and soil pH ( r = −0.50) in shaping the spatial pattern and vegetation structure. Our result implies that the present vegetation composition and spatial assemblages are due to heavy anthropogenic interventions, especially mining activities. Therefore, the heavily degraded fragile riparian system of the Panjkora River and its tributaries needed to be conserved and restored by predicting the composition of communities in response to changing climatic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kishwar Ali & Nasrullah Khan & Rafi Ullah & Muzammil Shah & Muhammad Ezaz Hasan Khan & David Aaron Jones & Maha Dewidar, 2022. "Spatial Pattern and Key Environmental Determinants of Vegetation in Sand Mining and Non-Mining Sites along the Panjkora River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1801-:d:942850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1801/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1801/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mtero, Farai, 2017. "Rural livelihoods, large-scale mining and agrarian change in Mapela, Limpopo, South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 190-200.
    2. Mahmood A. Khwaja & Sumbul Saeed & Maham Urooj, 2018. "Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Northern Route Road Construction Activities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan," Working Papers id:12846, eSocialSciences.
    3. Sandra Díaz & Jens Kattge & Johannes H. C. Cornelissen & Ian J. Wright & Sandra Lavorel & Stéphane Dray & Björn Reu & Michael Kleyer & Christian Wirth & I. Colin Prentice & Eric Garnier & Gerhard Böni, 2016. "The global spectrum of plant form and function," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7585), pages 167-171, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Visansack Khamphengvong & Hongou Zhang & Qitao Wu & Toulany Thavisay, 2022. "Examine the Economic and Social Effects on Lao People’s Perceived Benefit Attitudes towards BRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Arthur Vinicius Rodrigues & Fábio Leal Viana Bones & Alisson Schneiders & Laio Zimermann Oliveira & Alexander Christian Vibrans & André Luís de Gasper, 2018. "Plant Trait Dataset for Tree-Like Growth Forms Species of the Subtropical Atlantic Rain Forest in Brazil," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, May.
    3. John R. Owen & Vlado Vivoda & Deanna Kemp, 2020. "Country-level governance frameworks for mining-induced resettlement," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4907-4928, June.
    4. Joti kumari & Jai Kumar, 2023. "Influence of motivation on teachers’ job performance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Angelo Antoci & Paolo Russu & Elisa Ticci, 2019. "Mining and Local Economies: Dilemma between Environmental Protection and Job Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Idemudia, Uwafiokun & Tuokuu, Francis Xavier D. & Essah, Marcellinus, 2022. "The extractive industry and human rights in Africa: Lessons from the past and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Tröster, Rasmus & Hiete, Michael, 2019. "Do voluntary sustainability certification schemes in the sector of mineral resources meet stakeholder demands? A multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Shahid Mahmood & Muazzam Sabir & Ghaffar Ali, 2020. "Infrastructure projects and sustainable development: Discovering the stakeholders’ perception in the case of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Eromose Ehije Ebhuoma & Mulala Danny Simatele & Llewellyn Leonard & Osadolor Obiahon Ebhuoma & Felix Kwabena Donkor & Henry Bikwibili Tantoh, 2020. "Theorising Indigenous Farmers’ Utilisation of Climate Services: Lessons from the Oil-Rich Niger Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Mnwana, Sonwabile & Bowman, Andrew, 2018. "Mine mechanisation and distributional conflict in rural South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 227-237.
    11. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2023. "How can shares be increased for indigenous peoples in state rights paid by mining companies? An education incentive through direct contribution to the people," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    12. Yang, Yiling & Xiong, Kangning & Xiao, Jie, 2024. "A review of agroforestry biodiversity-driven provision of ecosystem services and implications for karst desertification control," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Lei Wang & Xiaobo Huang & Jianrong Su, 2022. "Tree Species Diversity and Stand Attributes Differently Influence the Ecosystem Functions of Pinus yunnanensis Secondary Forests under the Climate Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Muhirwa, Fabien & Shen, Lei & Elshkaki, Ayman & Hirwa, Hubert & Umuziranenge, Gloriose & Velempini, Kgosietsile, 2023. "Linking large extractive industries to sustainable development of rural communities at mining sites in Africa: Challenges and pathways," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Xinli Chen & Peter B. Reich & Anthony R. Taylor & Zhengfeng An & Scott X. Chang, 2024. "Resource availability enhances positive tree functional diversity effects on carbon and nitrogen accrual in natural forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Ahmad Saad & Guan Xinping & Mariah Ijaz, 2019. "China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Its Influence on Perceived Economic and Social Goals: Implications for Social Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Netsanet Zeleke Haile & Admassu Tesso Huluka & Amsalu Bedemo Beyene, 2024. "The impact of mining projects on household livelihoods in the Benishangul-Gumuz Region, Ethiopia," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(4), pages 925-942, December.
    18. Muhammad Awais & Tanzila Samin & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Jinsoo Hwang, 2019. "The Sustainable Development of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor: Synergy among Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Alessandro Bricca & Federico Maria Tardella & Arianna Ferrara & Tiziana Panichella & Andrea Catorci, 2021. "Exploring Assembly Trajectories of Abandoned Grasslands in Response to 10 Years of Mowing in Sub-Mediterranean Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Ricotta, Carlo & Pavoine, Sandrine, 2022. "A new parametric measure of functional dissimilarity: Bridging the gap between the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and the Euclidean distance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1801-:d:942850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.