IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1747-d936806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest Landscape Restoration Legislation and Policy: A Canadian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Mansuy

    (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 122 Street, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada)

  • Hyejin Hwang

    (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 351, Boul. Saint-Joseph, Gatineau, QC K1A 0H3, Canada)

  • Ritikaa Gupta

    (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4, Canada)

  • Christa Mooney

    (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4, Canada)

  • Barbara Kishchuk

    (Science Consultation Services and Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, 2155 College Avenue, Regina, SK S4P 4V5, Canada)

  • Eric Higgs

    (School of Environmental studies, University of Victoria, David Turpin Building, B243, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada)

Abstract

Restoring degraded ecosystems is an urgent policy priority to regain ecological integrity, advance sustainable land use management, and mitigate climate change. This study examined current legislation and policies supporting forest landscape restoration (FLR) in Canada to assess its capacity to advance restoration planning and efforts. First, a literature review was performed to assess the policy dimension of FLR globally and across Canada. Then, a Canada-wide policy scan using national databases was conducted. While published research on ecological restoration has increased exponentially in Canada and globally since the early 1990s, our results showed that the policy dimensions of FLR remain largely under documented in the scientific literature, despite their key role in implementing effective restoration measures on the ground. Our analyses have identified over 200 policy instruments and show that Canada has developed science-based FLR policies and best practices driven by five main types of land use and extraction activities: (1) mining and oil and gas activities; (2) sustainable forest management; (3) environmental impact assessment; (4) protected areas and parks; and (5) protection and conservation of species at risk. Moreover, FLR policies have been recently added to the national climate change mitigation agenda as part of the nature-based solutions and the net-zero emission strategy. Although a pioneer in restoration, we argue that Canada can take a more targeted and proactive approach in advancing its restoration agenda in order to cope with a changing climate and increased societal demands for ecosystem services and Indigenous rights. Considering the multifunctional values of the landscape, the science–policy interface is critical to transform policy aspirations into realizable and quantifiable targets in conjunction with other land-use objectives and values.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Mansuy & Hyejin Hwang & Ritikaa Gupta & Christa Mooney & Barbara Kishchuk & Eric Higgs, 2022. "Forest Landscape Restoration Legislation and Policy: A Canadian Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1747-:d:936806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Wellstead & Jeremy Rayner & Michael Howlett, 2016. "Alberta's oil sands reclamation policy trajectory: the role of tense layering, policy stretching, and policy patching in long-term policy dynamics," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(10), pages 1873-1890, October.
    2. Matthew Agarwala & Giles Atkinson & Christopher Baldock & Barry Gardiner, 2014. "Natural capital accounting and climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 520-522, July.
    3. Melanie Zurba & Karen F. Beazley & Emilie English & Johanna Buchmann-Duck, 2019. "Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs), Aichi Target 11 and Canada’s Pathway to Target 1: Focusing Conservation on Reconciliation," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie L. Barr & Christopher J. Lemieux, 2021. "Assessing organizational readiness to adapt to climate change in a regional protected areas context: lessons learned from Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Brennan Vogel & Lilia Yumagulova & Gordon McBean & Kerry Ann Charles Norris, 2022. "Indigenous-Led Nature-Based Solutions for the Climate Crisis: Insights from Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. repec:thr:techub:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:38-62 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Rudoler, David & Peckham, Allie & Grudniewicz, Agnes & Marchildon, Greg, 2019. "Coordinating primary care services: A case of policy layering," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 215-221.
    5. C. A. K. Lovell, 2021. "The Pandemic, The Climate, and Productivity," CEPA Working Papers Series WP112021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    6. Darshana Rajapaksa & Moinul Islam & Shunsuke Managi, 2017. "Natural Capital Depletion: the Impact of Natural Disasters on Inclusive Growth," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 233-244, October.
    7. Jessica L. Needham & Karen F. Beazley & Victoria P. Papuga, 2020. "Accessing Local Tacit Knowledge as a Means of Knowledge Co-Production for Effective Wildlife Corridor Planning in the Chignecto Isthmus, Canada," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-38, September.
    8. Wan-Jiun Chen & Chien-Ho Wang, 2020. "A General Cross-Country Panel Analysis for the Effects of Capitals and Energy, on Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Robert F. Baldwin & Karen F. Beazley, 2019. "Emerging Paradigms for Biodiversity and Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Tauli-Corpuz, Vicky & Alcorn, Janis & Molnar, Augusta & Healy, Christina & Barrow, Edmund, 2020. "Cornered by PAs: Adopting rights-based approaches to enable cost-effective conservation and climate action," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Berio, Mark Jason M., 2022. "Analysis of the Sustainability, Vulnerability, and Challenges of Aquaculture Livelihood Projects," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(3), pages 38-62.
    12. Kris Hartley & Michael Howlett, 2021. "Policy Assemblages and Policy Resilience: Lessons for Non-Design from Evolutionary Governance Theory," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 451-459.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1747-:d:936806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.