IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2021i1p16-d708591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage from the Perspective of Public Participation—A Case Study of Northern Mining Area of Pingdingshan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolu Wu

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Li Yu

    (School of Geography and Planning, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK)

  • Haosen Fang

    (Hubei Urban Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430064, China)

  • Jing Wu

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

With the decline of the big industrial period, many industrial cities in China are facing the problem of urban transformation. Post-industrial economic activities and social life often replace the demand for land and population growth, and the particular type of cultural heritage of industrial heritage is often abandoned and decayed. Recent domestic and foreign research has responded to this problem and sought to provide solutions for the protection and reuse of industrial heritage. Despite some progress, the advice and feelings of ordinary citizens are often rarely considered, or how local urban characteristics become the core of urban reconstruction. To solve this problem, the focus of this study is the case study of Pingdingshan City. Pingdingshan is an industrial city with coal as its core industry. Shortly, the problem of industrial heritage will be a severe problem facing the city. The study included research designs and methods for collecting data from field observations, questionnaires, interviews, and literature studies. In the process, researchers have critically considered the importance and implications of public participation in exploring the way in which they are protected and reused through the protection and reuse of industrial heritage. It is particularly worth mentioning that in the reconstruction of the protection and reuse of industrial heritage in Pingdingshan, government officials and enterprises lack sensitivity to local conditions and the views of residents. The study concluded that the protection and reuse of industrial heritage require public participation and that the public’s demands can guide and determine the way industrial heritage is protected and reused.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolu Wu & Li Yu & Haosen Fang & Jing Wu, 2021. "Research on the Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage from the Perspective of Public Participation—A Case Study of Northern Mining Area of Pingdingshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:16-:d:708591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xosé Somoza-Medina & Obdulia Monteserín-Abella, 2021. "The Sustainability of Industrial Heritage Tourism Far from the Axes of Economic Development in Europe: Two Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenwei Huang & Gui Xiong & Lei Zhong & Keqing Li & Hongyang Li & Martin Skitmore & Nima Talebian, 2022. "Research into Satisfaction with Industrial Heritage Renewal Based on the SEM-IPA Model: A Case Study of the Dongguan Jianyuzhou Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Chenqi Han & Yimin Song & Yang Zhao, 2024. "An Evaluation Study on Tourists’ Environmental Satisfaction after Re-Use of Industrial Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zebo Ni & Taohua Ouyang & Jianxiong Xu, 2023. "Research on the Sustainable Development of Enterprises That Evoke Industrial Heritage—A Case Study of Taoxichuan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Adriaan De Man, 2023. "Tangential Heritage Values in Museum Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Zhengyuan Zhao & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Development Path of Industrial Heritage Tourism: A Case Study of Kitakyushu (Japan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Tomas Kačerauskas, 2023. "Disinterestedness in the Creative Economy: The Case of the MO Museum in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Rui Han & Shiqi Yang, 2023. "A Study on Industrial Heritage Renewal Strategy Based on Hybrid Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    6. Mi Yan & Qingmiao Li & Jiazhen Zhang, 2023. "Rethinking Industrial Heritage Tourism Resources in the EU: A Spatial Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-32, July.
    7. Aleksandra Kuzior & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Dariusz Krawczyk, 2021. "Post-Industrial Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Florentina-Cristina Merciu & Ana Valeria Stoican & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Ana-Maria Vasiloiu, 2021. "The Perception Of Romanian Tourists On The Attractiveness Of The Industrial Heritage. Case Study: Municipality Of Cluj-Napoca," Cactus - The tourism journal for research, education, culture and soul, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 6-16.
    9. Jörn Harfst & Jasmin Sandriester & Wolfgang Fischer, 2021. "Industrial Heritage Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development? A Case Study of Steirische Eisenstrasse (Austria)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Juan Claver & Amabel García-Domínguez & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2021. "Collaborative Cataloging of Spanish Industrial Heritage Assets through Teaching in Project Management Subjects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:16-:d:708591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.