IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p476-d1733193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Civil Wars on the Financial Soundness of Banks: Evidence from Sudan Using Altman’s Models and Stress Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Mudathir Abuelgasim

    (Financial Management Department, College of Business Administration, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia)

  • Said Toumi

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Business Administration, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study assesses the financial soundness of Sudanese commercial banks during escalating civil conflict by integrating Altman’s Z-score models with scenario-based stress testing. Using audited financial data from 2016 to 2022 (pre-war) and projections through to 2028, the analysis evaluates resilience under low- and high-intensity conflict scenarios. Altman’s Model 3 (for non-industrial firms) and Model 4 (for emerging markets) are applied to capture liquidity, retained earnings, profitability, and leverage dynamics. The findings reveal relative stability between 2017–2020 and in 2022, contrasted by significant vulnerability in 2016 and 2021 due to macroeconomic deterioration, sanctions, and political instability. Liquidity emerged as the most critical driver of Z-score performance, followed by earnings retention and profitability, while leverage showed a context-specific positive effect under Sudan’s Islamic finance framework. Stress testing indicates that even under low-intensity conflict, rising liquidity risk, capital erosion, and credit risk threaten sectoral stability by 2025. High-intensity conflict projections suggest systemic collapse by 2028, characterized by unsustainable liquidity depletion, near-zero capital adequacy, and widespread defaults. The results demonstrate a direct relationship between conflict duration and systemic fragility, affirming the predictive value of Altman’s models when combined with stress testing. Policy implications include the urgent need for enhanced risk-based supervision, Basel II/III implementation, crisis reserves, contingency planning, and coordinated regulatory interventions to safeguard the stability of the banking sector in fragile states.

Suggested Citation

  • Mudathir Abuelgasim & Said Toumi, 2025. "Effects of Civil Wars on the Financial Soundness of Banks: Evidence from Sudan Using Altman’s Models and Stress Testing," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:476-:d:1733193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pagratis, Spyros & Topaloglou, Nikolas & Tsionas, Mike, 2017. "System stress testing of bank liquidity risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA), pages 22-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan A. Batten & Tonmoy Choudhury & Harald Kinateder & Niklas F. Wagner, 2024. "Correction to: Volatility impacts on the European banking sector: GFC and COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 1195-1195, January.
    2. Florian NEAGU & Irina MIHAI, 2022. "Macroprudential Liquidity Stress Test : How To Cope With Liquidity Drains," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 96-111, December.
    3. Zhiyong Li & Chen Feng & Ying Tang, 2022. "Bank efficiency and failure prediction: a nonparametric and dynamic model based on data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 279-315, August.
    4. Sadeghzadeh Yazdi , Ali & Abounoori , Esmaiel & Erfani , Alireza, 2018. "Modeling the Liquidity Gap in a Private Bank," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 13(2), pages 153-176, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:476-:d:1733193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.