IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i2p99-d1670804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Expenditure-Based Portfolio Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Attila Bányai

    (Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

  • Tibor Tatay

    (Department of Statistics, Finances and Controlling, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem square 1, H-9026 Győr, Hungary)

  • Gergő Thalmeiner

    (Department of Investment, Finance and Accounting, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

  • László Pataki

    (Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration, John von Neumann University, Infopark sétány 1, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
    Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Lóránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

This study examines whether portfolio optimization can be effectively based on annual changes in the harmonized index of consumer prices (HICP) data. Specifically, we assess whether asset allocation based on consumer expenditure can generate superior returns compared to static or equal-weighted asset allocation. To explore this, we use consumer expenditure data from HICP statistics categorized by COICOP. Our findings indicate that this strategy outperforms a buy-and-hold benchmark by 13.32% in terms of the Sharpe Ratio and exceeds an annual equal-weighted rebalancing strategy by 3.11%. Additionally, both the Calmar and Sterling Ratios demonstrate improved performance, further reinforcing the robustness of this approach. Furthermore, a hypothetical scenario where sector weights from the end of the given year—though not yet available during the year—are used suggests even greater improvements in performance. A high-sample bootstrap simulation confirms that the observed performance differences are not random but reflect the independent effectiveness of asset allocation based on consumer expenditure trends. This result strengthens the validity of our backtesting findings, indicating that the examined strategy could generate excess returns compared to passive portfolio managment and fixed-weight rebalancing approaches. The result of the study is therefore the development of an effective portfolio rebalancing strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Attila Bányai & Tibor Tatay & Gergő Thalmeiner & László Pataki, 2025. "Consumer Expenditure-Based Portfolio Optimization," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:99-:d:1670804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/99/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/99/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caporin, Massimiliano & Lisi, Francesco, 2011. "Comparing and selecting performance measures using rank correlations," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 5, pages 1-34.
    2. Li, Jianjun & Li, Qize & Wei, Xu, 2020. "Financial literacy, household portfolio choice and investment return," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Attila Bányai & Tibor Tatay & Gergő Thalmeiner & László Pataki, 2024. "Optimising Portfolio Risk by Involving Crypto Assets in a Volatile Macroeconomic Environment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Does childhood adversity affect household portfolio decisions? Evidence from the Chinese Great Famine," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Massimiliano Caporin & Grégory M. Jannin & Francesco Lisi & Bertrand B. Maillet, 2014. "A Survey On The Four Families Of Performance Measures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 917-942, December.
    3. Wu, Manhua & Tian, Xiujuan & Ma, Lin & Peng, Nianjiao, 2024. "Role transition, investment practice and risk Management of Peer-to-peer Lending Investors: Based on the perspective of investor learning," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Anand, Abhinav & Li, Tiantian & Kurosaki, Tetsuo & Kim, Young Shin, 2016. "Foster–Hart optimal portfolios," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 117-130.
    5. Korn, Olaf & Möller, Philipp M. & Schwehm, Christian, 2019. "Drawdown measures: Are they all the same?," CFR Working Papers 19-04, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    6. Gerrans, Paul, 2021. "Undergraduate student financial education interventions: Medium term evidence of retention, decay, and confidence in financial literacy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Silky Vigg Kushwah & Shab Hundal & Payal Goel, 2024. "Unveiling Interconnectedness and Volatility Transmission: A Novel GARCH Analysis of Leading Global Cryptocurrencies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 132-139, May.
    8. Stoian, Andreea & Vintila, Nicoleta & Iorgulescu, Filip & Cepoi, Cosmin Octavian & Dina Manolache, Aurora, 2021. "How Risk Aversion and Financial Literacy Shape Young Adults’ Investment Preferences," MPRA Paper 109755, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Korkmaz, Aslihan Gizem & Yin, Zhichao & Yue, Pengpeng & Zhou, Haigang, 2021. "Does financial literacy alleviate risk attitude and risk behavior inconsistency?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 293-310.
    10. León, Angel & Navarro, Lluís & Nieto, Belén, 2019. "Screening rules and portfolio performance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 642-662.
    11. Li, Qize & Brounen, Dirk & Li, Jianjun & Wei, Xu, 2022. "Social interactions and Chinese households’ participation in the risky financial market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Ángel León & Manuel Moreno, 2015. "Lower Partial Moments under Gram Charlier Distribution: Performance Measures and Efficient Frontiers," QM&ET Working Papers 15-3, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
    13. Yasmeen Ansari & Mansour Saleh Albarrak & Noorjahan Sherfudeen & Arfia Aman, 2022. "A Study of Financial Literacy of Investors—A Bibliometric Analysis," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Zhiyuan Luo & S M Ferdous Azam & Laixi Wang, 2023. "Impact of financial literacy on household stock profit level in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Fong, Joelle H. & Koh, Benedict S.K. & Mitchell, Olivia S. & Rohwedder, Susann, 2021. "Financial literacy and financial decision-making at older ages," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Lu, Xiaomeng & Zhang, Xianjun & Guo, Fusen & Li, Feng, 2024. "Evaluating ESG Investment Profitability: From the Perspective of Sophistication in Investment Decision-Making," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    17. Trinh Quang Long & Peter J. Morgan & Naoyuki Yoshino, 2023. "Financial literacy, behavioral traits, and ePayment adoption and usage in Japan," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, December.
    18. Junjun Ma & Xindan Li & Lei Lu & Weixing Wu & Xiong Xiong, 2022. "Individual investors' dispersion in beliefs and stock returns," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(3), pages 929-953, September.
    19. Qian, Yuting & Tan, Weiqiang & Wu, Jingbo, 2024. "Household financial literacy and retirement planning in rural China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    20. Congmin Peng & Po-Wen She & Ming-Kun Lin, 2022. "Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversity in China," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 452-465, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:99-:d:1670804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.