IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i6p921-d1676049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reimagining Partnerships Between Black Communities and Academic Health Research Institutions: Towards Equitable Power in Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Khadijah Ameen

    (Department of Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, 140 Decatur St, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Collins O. Airhihenbuwa

    (Department of Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, 140 Decatur St, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Kimberley Freire

    (Department of Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, 140 Decatur St, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Monica Ponder

    (Department of Communication, Culture and Media Studies, Cathy Hughes School of Communications, Howard University, 300 Bryant St NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA)

  • Alicia Hosein

    (Department of Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, 140 Decatur St, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

Abstract

Community-Engaged Research (CER) arose as a means of increasing the democratic participation of communities that study outcomes directly impact. CER has been identified as a recommended approach for conducting biomedical and behavioral health research with Black communities, a population that has been excluded from and exploited by academic health research for centuries. However, solely increasing community participation without identifying and redressing racialized power imbalances within community–academic partnerships involving Black populations can stall progress towards racial health equity. The purpose of this study was to explore how power can be redistributed equitably in community–academic health research partnerships involving Black populations. Utilizing the qualitative methodological approach of critical narrative inquiry, counter-stories from 12 Black individuals who have served as community partners on U.S.-based academic health research teams were collected via in-depth semi-structured narrative interviews. A reflexive thematic analysis approach was utilized to identify and analyze strategies expressed by study participants for increasing community agency, efficacy, and solidarity in health research. By centering the voices of Black community members who have directly engaged with academic health research institutions, this study sought to amplify the desires and aspirations of Black communities regarding shifting power in health research processes and outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Khadijah Ameen & Collins O. Airhihenbuwa & Kimberley Freire & Monica Ponder & Alicia Hosein, 2025. "Reimagining Partnerships Between Black Communities and Academic Health Research Institutions: Towards Equitable Power in Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:921-:d:1676049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison Mathie & Jenny Cameron & Katherine Gibson, 2017. "Asset-based and citizen-led development: Using a diffracted power lens to analyze the possibilities and challenges," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(1), pages 54-66, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fuchs, Lisa Elena & Orero, Levi & Apondi, Victoria Atieno & Kipkorir, Lang'at, 2021. "How to stop wasting money in international development: Using a structured group selection approach to counter procedural inefficiency," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    2. David Oonk, & Kaul, Mokshda & Maurer, Ben & M.A. Karwat, Darshan, 2023. "Public value mapping to assess and guide governmental investments in energy and environmental justice: Studying the United States Department of Energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Niebert Blair & Dirk Pons & Susan Krumdieck, 2019. "Electrification in Remote Communities: Assessing the Value of Electricity Using a Community Action Research Approach in Kabakaburi, Guyana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Rita Agdal & Inger Helen Midtgård & Vigdis Meidell, 2019. "Can Asset-Based Community Development with Children and Youth Enhance the Level of Participation in Health Promotion Projects? A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:921-:d:1676049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.