Author
Listed:
- Leonard Owino Kachienga
(Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, P/bag x5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)
- Thendo Ndou
(Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, P/bag x5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)
- Mpumelelo Casper Rikhotso
(Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, P/bag x5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)
- Afsatou Ndama Traore
(Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, P/bag x5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)
- Natasha Potgieter
(Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, P/bag x5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa)
Abstract
The primary sources of widespread pollution in most river catchments are improperly treated final effluents from various wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), affecting the physicochemical characteristics of the receiving water bodies. Wastewater discharge must be monitored regularly to ensure compliance with national and municipal water quality regulatory/standard restrictions. This study monitored the physicochemical parameters of two typical WWTPs (WWTP A = a peri-urban plant and WWTP B = a rural plant) for 5 months. The physicochemical parameters that were assessed included pH, temperature, total dissolved solids (TDSs), turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), alkalinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), free chlorine, chloride, sulphate, phosphate, ammonium, and electrical conductivity (EC). The evaluation yielded the following results: temperature (14 to 21 °C and 14 to 23 °C), pH (7.2–8.2 and 7.3–8.4), EC (90–800 μs/cm and 80–750 μs/cm), TDSs (65–440 and 55–410 mg/L), alkalinity (2.6–20.9 mg/L), nitrate (0.24–26.5 mg/L), nitrite (0.01–90 mg/L), phosphate (0.0–18.0 mg/L and 0.0–21 mg/L), ammonia (0.2–75 mg/L and 0.8–70 mg/L), sulphate (0.0–18.0 mg/L and 0.0–21 mg/L), chloride (5.0–22.0 mg/L and 2.0–25 mg/L), COD (6.0–710 mg/L and 7.0–800 mg/L), and turbidity (0.4–150 NTU and 1.8–130 NTU) for wastewater treatment A and B, respectively. The results also showed that temperature, pH, TDSs, nitrite/nitrate, chloride, turbidity, alkalinity, sulphate, and free chlorine were among the parameters in the final effluent discharged that met the set guidelines. In contrast, parameters such as COD, EC, phosphate, and ammonia did not meet the guideline values for most of the sampling period for both WWTPs. Furthermore, this study found that WWTPs reduced nitrate, sulphate, phosphate, and COD pollutants by more than 90% while maintaining 60% alkalinity. Temperature, pH, TDSs, EC, Cl − , and other parameters were less than 40% for WWTP A and roughly less than 50% for WWTP B.
Suggested Citation
Leonard Owino Kachienga & Thendo Ndou & Mpumelelo Casper Rikhotso & Afsatou Ndama Traore & Natasha Potgieter, 2025.
"Assessing the Physiochemical Parameters and Reduction Efficiency from Two Typical Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Vhembe District in South Africa,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-15, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:856-:d:1668329
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:856-:d:1668329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.