IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2224-d1047463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism Development under Water-Energy Dual Constraints: A Case Study from Xinjiang Based on Different Emergency Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Ruifang Wang

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Fengping Wu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Zhaoli He

    (School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210046, China)

Abstract

The concept of green development requires that tourism development should be constrained by water and energy. This paper first constructed the calculation model of tourism water supply (TWS) based on water resources, economy, population, and employment. Second, according to the tourism life cycle theory, the energy-related water footprint account was built and combined with energy and water consumption, to realize water-energy dual constraints. Then, a suitability model between TWS and tourism water footprint (TWF) was established. Last, this paper predicted the growth rate of tourists in Xinjiang under the “suitability” state between TWS and TWF. Results show that in a future emergency-free setting, the average annual growth rate of tourists must be below 9.63% to maintain the “suitability” state, and in the context of emergencies damaging public health or socio-economic stability, the average annual growth rate may rise to 12.79%. In any scenario, the cap on tourist numbers in Xinjiang should be around 1.326 billion person-days in 2025, in line with the government’s planning goal. Last, this paper proposed suggestions to advance the green development of tourism from three angles: strengthening water conservation policies, promoting digital tourism, and setting multiple environmental monitoring mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruifang Wang & Fengping Wu & Zhaoli He, 2023. "Tourism Development under Water-Energy Dual Constraints: A Case Study from Xinjiang Based on Different Emergency Scenarios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2224-:d:1047463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gössling, Stefan & Peeters, Paul & Ceron, Jean-Paul & Dubois, Ghislain & Patterson, Trista & Richardson, Robert B., 2005. "The eco-efficiency of tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 417-434, September.
    2. Mi Tian & Qingwen Min & Fei Lun & Zheng Yuan & Anthony M. Fuller & Lun Yang & Yongxun Zhang & Jie Zhou, 2015. "Evaluation of Tourism Water Capacity in Agricultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Li, Jinghui & Bai, Yang & Alatalo, Juha M., 2020. "Impacts of rural tourism-driven land use change on ecosystems services provision in Erhai Lake Basin, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Iraldo & Benedetta Nucci, 2016. "Proactive environmental management in hotels: What difference does it make?," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 81-106.
    2. Chengkun Huang & Feiyang Lin & Deping Chu & Lanlan Wang & Jiawei Liao & Junqian Wu, 2021. "Coupling Relationship and Interactive Response between Intensive Land Use and Tourism Industry Development in China’s Major Tourist Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Tsai, Kang-Ting & Lin, Tzu-Ping & Hwang, Ruey-Lung & Huang, Yu-Jing, 2014. "Carbon dioxide emissions generated by energy consumption of hotels and homestay facilities in Taiwan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 13-21.
    4. Zhaofeng Wang & Dongchun Huang & Jing Wang, 2023. "Exploring Spatial Correlations of Tourism Ecological Security in China: A Perspective from Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Sun, Ya-Yen & Cadarso, Maria Angeles & Driml, Sally, 2020. "Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Gössling, Stefan & Scott, Daniel & Hall, C. Michael, 2015. "Inter-market variability in CO2 emission-intensities in tourism: Implications for destination marketing and carbon management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 203-212.
    7. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Zia ul Haq & Hafiz ur Rehman, 2019. "The Contribution of Sustainable Tourism to Economic Growth and Employment in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Moaaz Kabil & Mohamed Abouelseoud & Faisal Alsubaie & Heba Mostafa Hassan & Imre Varga & Katalin Csobán & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Evolutionary Relationship between Tourism and Real Estate: Evidence and Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Horng, Jeou-Shyan & Hu, Meng-Lei (Monica) & Teng, Chih-Ching (Chris) & Hsiao, Han-Liang & Liu, Chih-Hsing (Sam), 2013. "Development and validation of the low-carbon literacy scale among practitioners in the Taiwanese tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 255-262.
    10. Becken, S. & Simmons, D., 2008. "Using the concept of yield to assess the sustainability of different tourist types," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 420-429, October.
    11. Nakamura, Hiroki & Abe, Naoya, 2016. "Tourist decisions in renting various personal travel modes: A case study in Kitakyushu City, Japan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 85-93.
    12. Davies, N.J. & Weston, R., 2015. "Reducing car-use for leisure: Can organised walking groups switch from car travel to bus and train walks?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 23-29.
    13. Jing Gong & Hongyan Du & Zhi Wang, 2022. "Analysis of the Influences of Ecological Compensation Projects on Transfer Employment of Rural Labor from the Perspective of Capability," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Yu Zhang & Jin-he Zhang & Qing Tian, 2021. "Virtual Water Trade in the Service Sector: China’s Inbound Tourism as a Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Robert Maršanic & Edna Mrnjavac & Drago Pupavac & Ljudevit Krpan, 2021. "Stationary Traffic as a Factor of Tourist Destination Quality and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Bing Xia & Suocheng Dong & Zehong Li & Minyan Zhao & Dongqi Sun & Wenbiao Zhang & Yu Li, 2022. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Drivers in Tourism Sectors with Respect to Carbon Emissions from the Supply Chain: An Integrated EEIO and DEA Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Xingyu Yang & Fengtai Zhang & Yuedong Xiao & Youzhi An & Caixia Jiang & Hongmei Tan & Guofang Gong, 2023. "Coupling and interaction between tourism eco-efficiency and new urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: based on the perspective of uncoupling coordination," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13171-13197, November.
    18. Puertas, Rosa & Guaita-Martinez, José M. & Carracedo, Patricia & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2022. "Analysis of European environmental policies: Improving decision making through eco-efficiency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Slak Valek, Nataša, 2015. "Tourism expenditure according to mode of transportation: A comparative study between 2009 and 2012," MPRA Paper 77406, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Oct 2015.
    20. Rui Cao & Yanhua Mo & Jiangming Ma, 2023. "Carbon Footprint Analysis of Tourism Life Cycle: The Case of Guilin from 2011 to 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2224-:d:1047463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.