IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3994-d781012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empathy as a Factor Conditioning Attitudes towards the Elderly among Physiotherapists—Results from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Podhorecka

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus, University Copernicus, 85-094 Torun, Poland)

  • Anna Pyszora

    (Department of Palliative Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus, University Copernicus, 85-094 Torun, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Woźniewicz

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus, University Copernicus, 85-094 Torun, Poland)

  • Jakub Husejko

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus, University Copernicus, 85-094 Torun, Poland)

  • Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus, University Copernicus, 85-094 Torun, Poland)

Abstract

Attitudes of healthcare workers towards the elderly significantly affect the quality of care dedicated to this group of patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the approach of Polish physiotherapists to the elderly and to analyze the factors influencing these attitudes. The study was based on a cross-sectional Internet-based survey that was conducted in the period from May to September 2021. It was completed by 252 subjects: 189 women and 63 men. The study was based on the involvement of physiotherapists with the right to practice their profession in accordance with the law in force in Poland. The tools used in the study were The Kogan Attitudes towards the Elderly (KAOP) score and The Jefferson Empathy Scale (JSE). To model the KOAP score as a function of the predictors, Bayesian linear regression was used. The average KOAP score in the sample was M (SD) = 100.7 (17.46), with the central 50% of the observations ranging from 81 to 113 points. We observed one statistically credible relationship: relevance of contacts with elderly people was positively and moderately related to KOAP. Additionally, we observed that the JSE scale was positively, but very weakly, associated with KOAP. Empathy and own experience of health care providers may protect against negative attitudes towards the elderly, meaning empathy in healthcare professionals is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Podhorecka & Anna Pyszora & Agnieszka Woźniewicz & Jakub Husejko & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska, 2022. "Empathy as a Factor Conditioning Attitudes towards the Elderly among Physiotherapists—Results from Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3994-:d:781012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3994/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liat Ayalon, 2018. "Perceived Age Discrimination: A Precipitator or a Consequence of Depressive Symptoms?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 860-869.
    2. Boushra Abdullah & Gregor Wolbring, 2013. "Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Active Aging through the Lens of the 2002 World Health Organization Active Ageing Report: A Policy Framework and the 2010 Toronto Charter for Physical Activity: A Glo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Anna Rosa Donizzetti, 2019. "Ageism in an Aging Society: The Role of Knowledge, Anxiety about Aging, and Stereotypes in Young People and Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Jiyeon Ha & Juah Kim, 2021. "Ageism and the Factors Affecting Ageism among Korean Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Carolina Fernández-Jiménez & Joaquín F. Álvarez-Hernández & Darío Salguero-García & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Rubén Trigueros, 2020. "Validation of the Lasher and Faulkender Anxiety about Aging Scale (AAS) for the Spanish Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Yongseop Kim & Junhyoung Kim & Jung-Min Lee & Dong-Chul Seo & Hyun Chul Jung, 2022. "Intergenerational Taekwondo Program: A Narrative Review and Practical Intervention Proposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Andrew Stickley & Hans Oh & Ai Koyanagi & Mall Leinsalu & Zui Narita & Bayard Roberts & Martin McKee, 2019. "Perceived discrimination and psychological distress in nine countries of the former Soviet Union," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(2), pages 158-168, March.
    6. Anna Rosa Donizzetti & Martine Lagacé, 2022. "COVID-19 and the Elderly’s Mental Illness: The Role of Risk Perception, Social Isolation, Loneliness and Ageism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Dongjuan Xu & Yaqi Wang & Ming Li & Meng Zhao & Zhenhua Yang & Kefang Wang, 2022. "Depressive Symptoms and Ageism among Nursing Home Residents: The Role of Social Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-10, September.
    8. Peggy Palsgaard & Christian A. Maino Vieytes & Natasha Peterson & Sarah L. Francis & Lillie Monroe-Lord & Nadine R. Sahyoun & Melissa Ventura-Marra & Lee Weidauer & Furong Xu & Anna E. Arthur, 2022. "Healthcare Professionals’ Views and Perspectives towards Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3994-:d:781012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.