IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p3144-d766054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Utilization of Institutional Delivery Services in Zambia: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mamunur Rashid

    (Department of Public Health and Sports Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbacksvägen 47, 80176 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Mohammad Rocky Khan Chowdhury

    (Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Monash, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Department of Public Health, First Capital University of Bangladesh, Chuadanga 7200 R747, Bangladesh)

  • Manzur Kader

    (Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Solnavägen 1, 17177 Solna Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Anne-Sofie Hiswåls

    (Department of Public Health and Sports Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbacksvägen 47, 80176 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Gloria Macassa

    (Department of Public Health and Sports Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbacksvägen 47, 80176 Gävle, Sweden)

Abstract

Institutional delivery at birth is an important indicator of improvements in maternal health, which remains one of the targets of sustainable development goals intended to reduce the maternal mortality ratio. The purpose of the present study was to identify the determinants of utilization of institutional delivery in Zambia. A population-based cross-sectional study design was used to examine 9841 women aged 15–49 years from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey. A multiple logistic regression was applied to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify determinants of utilization of institutional delivery. Sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with institutional delivery: woman’s (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.04–2.99) and husband’s (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.09–3.05) secondary/higher education, higher wealth index (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.27–4.22), and rural place of residence (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30–0.98). Healthcare-related factors were also significantly associated with institutional delivery: 5–12 visits to antenatal care (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.66–3.26) and measuring blood pressure (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.32–2.66) during pregnancy. To improve institutional delivery and reduce maternal and newborn mortality, policymakers and public health planners should design an effective intervention program targeting these factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Mamunur Rashid & Mohammad Rocky Khan Chowdhury & Manzur Kader & Anne-Sofie Hiswåls & Gloria Macassa, 2022. "Determinants of Utilization of Institutional Delivery Services in Zambia: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3144-:d:766054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanni Yaya & Ghose Bishwajit & Michael Ekholuenetale, 2017. "Factors associated with the utilization of institutional delivery services in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Juan Ignacio Ruiz & Kaamel Nuhu & Justin Tyler McDaniel & Federico Popoff & Ariel Izcovich & Juan Martin Criniti, 2015. "Inequality as a Powerful Predictor of Infant and Maternal Mortality around the World," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Markos Mezmur & Kannan Navaneetham & Gobopamang Letamo & Hadgu Bariagaber, 2017. "Individual, household and contextual factors associated with skilled delivery care in Ethiopia: Evidence from Ethiopian demographic and health surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Tanvir M Huda & Morseda Chowdhury & Shams El Arifeen & Michael J Dibley, 2019. "Individual and community level factors associated with health facility delivery: A cross sectional multilevel analysis in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seman K. Ousman & Jeanette H. Magnus & Johanne Sundby & Mekdes K. Gebremariam, 2020. "Uptake of Skilled Maternal Healthcare in Ethiopia: A Positive Deviance Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Tania Walker & Mulu Woldegiorgis & Jahar Bhowmik, 2021. "Utilisation of Skilled Birth Attendant in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Trajectories and Key Sociodemographic Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Samuel Hailegebreal & Girma Gilano & Atsedu Endale Simegn & Binyam Tariku Seboka, 2022. "Spatial variation and determinant of home delivery in Ethiopia: Spatial and mixed effect multilevel analysis based on the Ethiopian mini demographic and health survey 2019," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Teshita Uke Chikako & Reta Habtamu Bacha & John Elvis Hagan & Abdul-Aziz Seidu & Kenenisa Abdisa Kuse & Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, 2022. "Multilevel Modelling of the Individual and Regional Level Variability in Predictors of Incomplete Antenatal Care Visit among Women of Reproductive Age in Ethiopia: Classical and Bayesian Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Sanni Yaya & Ghose Bishwajit & Michael Ekholuenetale & Vaibhav Shah & Bernard Kadio & Ogochukwu Udenigwe, 2017. "Timing and adequate attendance of antenatal care visits among women in Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Jahar Bhowmik & Raaj Kishore Biswas & Nurjahan Ananna, 2020. "Women’s education and coverage of skilled birth attendance: An assessment of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 in the South and Southeast Asian Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, 2020. "Predictors of unmet need for contraception among adolescent girls and young women in selected high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel mixed effects analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Tesfalidet Tekelab & Catherine Chojenta & Roger Smith & Deborah Loxton, 2019. "Factors affecting utilization of antenatal care in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Jan Vandemoortele, 2021. "The open‐and‐shut case against inequality," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(1), pages 135-151, January.
    10. Tanvir M Huda & Morseda Chowdhury & Shams El Arifeen & Michael J Dibley, 2019. "Individual and community level factors associated with health facility delivery: A cross sectional multilevel analysis in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Haque, Md Rabiul & Parr, Nick & Muhidin, Salut, 2020. "The effects of household's climate-related displacement on delivery and postnatal care service utilization in rural Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Tushar Bharati & Adnan M. S. Fakir, 2022. "Health Costs of a “Healthy Democracy”: The Impact of Peaceful Political Protests on Healthcare Utilization," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-15, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    13. Sanni Yaya & Ghose Bishwajit & Michael Ekholuenetale, 2017. "Factors associated with the utilization of institutional delivery services in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Adnan M.S. Fakir & Tushar Bharati, 2022. "Health Costs of a "Healthy Democracy": The Impact of Peaceful Political Protests on Healthcare Utilization," Working Paper Series 0522, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Felix Akpojene Ogbo & Felicity F. Trinh & Kedir Y. Ahmed & Praween Senanayake & Abdon G. Rwabilimbo & Noel E. Uwaibi & Kingsley E. Agho & Global Maternal and Child Health Research Collaboration (GloMA, 2020. "Prevalence, Trends, and Drivers of the Utilization of Unskilled Birth Attendants during Democratic Governance in Nigeria from 1999 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Cinzia Di Novi & Harshita Thakare, 2022. "Inequality of Opportunity in Accessing Maternal and Newborn Healthcare Services: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1505-1529, December.
    17. Seong-Uk Baek & Sung-Shil Lim & Jihyun Kim & Jin-Ha Yoon, 2019. "How Does Economic Inequality Affect Infanticide Rates? An Analysis of 15 Years of Death Records and Representative Economic Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Yan Xu & Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Rolle Remi Ahuru & Muhammad Khalid Anser & Romanus Osabohien & Ayesha Aziz, 2022. "Individual and community-level factors associated with non-institutional delivery of women of childbearing-age in Nigeria," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    19. Jin-Won Noh & Young-mi Kim & Nabeel Akram & Ki-Bong Yoo & Jooyoung Cheon & Lena J. Lee & Young Dae Kwon & Jelle Stekelenburg, 2019. "Impact of Socio-Economic Factors and Health Information Sources on Place of Birth in Sindh Province, Pakistan: A Secondary Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-10, March.
    20. Sanni Yaya & Ghose Bishwajit & Olalekan A Uthman & Agbessi Amouzou, 2018. "Why some women fail to give birth at health facilities: A comparative study between Ethiopia and Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3144-:d:766054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.