IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2275-d751426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bandemia as an Early Predictive Marker of Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Taku Harada

    (Department of General Medicine, Showa Koto Toyosu University Hospital, Tokyo 135-8577, Japan
    Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan)

  • Yukinori Harada

    (Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan)

  • Kohei Morinaga

    (Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan)

  • Takanobu Hirosawa

    (Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan)

  • Taro Shimizu

    (Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan)

Abstract

This single-center retrospective observational study aimed to verify whether a diagnosis of bandemia could be a predictive marker for bacteremia. We assessed 970 consecutive patients (median age 73 years; male 64.8%) who underwent two or more sets of blood cultures between April 2015 and March 2016 in both inpatient and outpatient settings. We assessed the value of bandemia (band count > 10%) and the percentage band count for predicting bacteremia using logistic regression models. Bandemia was detected in 151 cases (15.6%) and bacteremia was detected in 188 cases (19.4%). The incidence of bacteremia was significantly higher in cases with bandemia (52.3% vs. 13.3%; odds ratio (OR) = 7.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.91–10.5). The sensitivity and specificity of bandemia for predicting bacteremia were 0.42 and 0.91, respectively. The bandemia was retained as an independent predictive factor for the multivariable logistic regression model (OR, 6.13; 95% CI, 4.02–9.40). Bandemia is useful for establishing the risk of bacteremia, regardless of the care setting (inpatient or outpatient), with a demonstrable relationship between increased risk and bacteremia. A bandemia-based electronic alert for blood-culture collection may contribute to the improved diagnosis of bacteremia.

Suggested Citation

  • Taku Harada & Yukinori Harada & Kohei Morinaga & Takanobu Hirosawa & Taro Shimizu, 2022. "Bandemia as an Early Predictive Marker of Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-8, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2275-:d:751426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taro Takeshima & Yosuke Yamamoto & Yoshinori Noguchi & Nobuyuki Maki & Koichiro Gibo & Yukio Tsugihashi & Asako Doi & Shingo Fukuma & Shin Yamazaki & Eiji Kajii & Shunichi Fukuhara, 2016. "Identifying Patients with Bacteremia in Community-Hospital Emergency Rooms: A Retrospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Taku Harada & Taiju Miyagami & Kotaro Kunitomo & Taro Shimizu, 2021. "Clinical Decision Support Systems for Diagnosis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Roy M. Poses & Michele Anthony, 1991. "Availability, Wishful Thinking, and Physicians' Diagnostic Judgments for Patients with Suspected Bacteremia," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(3), pages 159-168, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Edward Russo & Margaret G. Meloy & T. Jeffrey Wilks, 2000. "Predecisional Distortion of Information by Auditors and Salespersons," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 13-27, January.
    2. Justin M. Ross & Sarah E. Larson & Chad Wall, 2012. "Are Surveys Of Experts Unbiased? Evidence From College Football Rankings," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 30(4), pages 502-522, October.
    3. Nuno Camacho & Bas Donkers & Stefan Stremersch, 2011. "Predictably Non-Bayesian: Quantifying Salience Effects in Physician Learning About Drug Quality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 305-320, 03-04.
    4. Braverman, Jennifer A. & Blumenthal-Barby, J.S., 2012. "Assessment of the sunk-cost effect in clinical decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 186-192.
    5. Yoshito Nishimura, 2022. "Primary Care, Burnout, and Patient Safety: Way to Eliminate Avoidable Harm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-3, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2275-:d:751426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.