IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2167-d749561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Informational and Emotional Elements Differ between Online Psychological and Physiological Disease Communities in China? A Comparative Study of Depression and Diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Zhizhen Yao

    (School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Center for the Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Department of Information Systems, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Zhenni Ni

    (School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Center for the Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Bin Zhang

    (School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Jian Du

    (National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China)

Abstract

Disease-specific online health communities provide a convenient and common platform for patients to share experiences, change information, provide and receive social support. This study aimed to compare differences between online psychological and physiological disease communities in topics, sentiment, participation, and emotional contagion patterns using multiple methods as well as to discuss how to satisfy the users’ different informational and emotional needs. We chose the online depression and diabetes communities on the Baidu Tieba platform as the data source. Topic modeling and theme coding were employed to analyze discussion preferences for various topic categories. Sentiment analysis was used to identify the sentiment polarity of each post and comment. The social network was used to represent the users’ interaction and emotional flows to discover the differences in participation and emotional contagion patterns between psychological and physiological disease communities. The results revealed that people affected by depression focused more on their symptoms and social relationships, while people affected by diabetes were more likely to discuss treatment and self-management behavior. In the depression community, there were obvious interveners spreading positive emotions and more core users in the negative emotional contagion network. In the diabetes community, emotional contagion was less prevalent and core users in positive and negative emotional contagion networks were basically the same. The study reveals insights into the differences between online psychological and physiological disease communities, providing a greater understanding of the users’ informational and emotional needs expressed online. These results are helpful for society to provide actual medical assistance and deploy health interventions based on disease types.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhizhen Yao & Zhenni Ni & Bin Zhang & Jian Du, 2022. "Do Informational and Emotional Elements Differ between Online Psychological and Physiological Disease Communities in China? A Comparative Study of Depression and Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2167-:d:749561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Ruthven & Steven Buchanan & Cara Jardine, 2018. "Relationships, environment, health and development: The information needs expressed online by young first‐time mothers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(8), pages 985-995, August.
    2. Sanghee Oh, 2012. "The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 543-557, March.
    3. Luiz Fernando Cal da Silva & Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & Rodrigo Richard Gomes, 2019. "Measuring Participation in Distance Education Online Discussion Forums Using Social Network Analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(2), pages 140-150, February.
    4. Jingfang Liu & Jun Kong & Xin Zhang, 2020. "Study on Differences between Patients with Physiological and Psychological Diseases in Online Health Communities: Topic Analysis and Sentiment Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Jingyun Tang & Guang Yu & Xiaoxu Yao, 2020. "A Comparative Study of Online Depression Communities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Cobb, N.K. & Graham, A.L. & Abrams, D.B., 2010. "Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(7), pages 1282-1289.
    7. Sanghee Oh, 2012. "The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 543-557, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Choi & Chirag Shah, 2016. "User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1182-1197, May.
    2. Ni Huang & Zhijun Yan & Haonan Yin, 2021. "Effects of Online–Offline Service Integration on e‐Healthcare Providers: A Quasi‐Natural Experiment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2359-2378, August.
    3. Jiabei Xia & Tailai Wu & Liqin Zhou, 2021. "Sharing of Verified Information about COVID-19 on Social Network Sites: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Jiaqi Liu & Zhenping Zhang & Jiayin Qi & Hong Wu & Manyi Chen, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Opinion Leaders’ Characteristics on Online Group Knowledge-Sharing Engagement from In-Group and Out-Group Perspectives: Evidence from a Chinese Online Knowledge-Sharing Com," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Adam Worrall & Alicia Cappello & Rachel Osolen, 2021. "The importance of socio‐emotional considerations in online communities, social informatics, and information science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1247-1260, October.
    6. Weiwei Yan & Xin Wen & Yin Zhang & Sonali Kudva & Qian Liu, 2023. "The dynamics of Q&A in academic social networking sites: insights from participants, interaction network, response time, and discipline differences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1895-1922, March.
    7. Kordzadeh, Nima & Warren, John & Seifi, Ali, 2016. "Antecedents of privacy calculus components in virtual health communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 724-734.
    8. Arun Kumar & Mrinalini Pandey, 2023. "Social Media and Impact of Altruistic Motivation, Egoistic Motivation, Subjective Norms, and EWOM toward Green Consumption Behavior: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, 2017. "Virtual Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing: Measurement Dilemmas," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 95-123.
    10. Junghwa Bahng & Chang Heon Lee, 2020. "Topic Modeling for Analyzing Patients’ Perceptions and Concerns of Hearing Loss on Social Q&A Sites: Incorporating Patients’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Yeganeh Charband & Nima Jafari Navimipour, 2016. "Online knowledge sharing mechanisms: a systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1131-1151, December.
    12. Luo, Chuan & Lan, Yao & (Robert) Luo, Xin & Li, Han, 2021. "The effect of commitment on knowledge sharing: An empirical study of virtual communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Tseng, Hsiao-Ting & Ibrahim, Fahad & Hajli, Nick & Nisar, Tahir M. & Shabbir, Haseeb, 2022. "Effect of privacy concerns and engagement on social support behaviour in online health community platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Qian Wu & Chei Sian Lee & Dion Hoe‐Lian Goh, 2023. "Understanding user‐generated questions in social Q&A: A goal‐framing approach," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 990-1009, August.
    15. Wenlong Liu & Xiucheng Fan & Rongrong Ji & Yi Jiang, 2019. "Perceived Community Support, Users’ Interactions, and Value Co-Creation in Online Health Community: The Moderating Effect of Social Exclusion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Luke J Matthews & Peter DeWan & Elizabeth Y Rula, 2013. "Methods for Inferring Health-Related Social Networks among Coworkers from Online Communication Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Fan Yang & Yao Jiang, 2020. "Heterogeneous Influences of Social Support on Physical and Mental Health: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Federica Duregon & Valentina Bullo & Andrea Di Blasio & Lucia Cugusi & Martina Pizzichemi & Salvatore Sciusco & Gianluca Viscioni & David Cruz-Diaz & Danilo Sales Bocalini & Alessandro Bortoletto & Fr, 2022. "The Role of Facebook ® in Promoting a Physically Active Lifestyle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Xuening Wang & Xianyun Tian & Xuwei Pan & Dongxu Wei & Qi Qi, 2021. "What Happens When People with Depression Gather Online?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Xiangyu Wang & Andrew High & Xi Wang & Kang Zhao, 2021. "Predicting users' continued engagement in online health communities from the quantity and quality of received support," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 710-722, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2167-:d:749561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.