IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9847-d884566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Bias in Self-Reported Social Media Use in the Age of Platform Swinging: Implications for Studying Social Media Use in Relation to Adolescent Health Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah C. Boyle

    (HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA)

  • Sebastian Baez

    (HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA)

  • Bradley M. Trager

    (HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA)

  • Joseph W. LaBrie

    (HeadsUP Labs, Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA)

Abstract

Public health researchers are increasingly interested in the potential relationships between social media (SM) use, well-being, and health behavior among adolescents. However, most research has assessed daily SM time via self-report survey questions, despite a lack of clarity around the accuracy of such reports given the current tendency of youth to access SM on multiple electronic devices and cycle between multiple SM platforms on a daily basis (i.e., platform swinging). The current study investigates the potential for systematic reporting biases to skew findings. Three hundred and twenty incoming college students downloaded software on their computers, tablets, and smartphones to track their active use of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat over a 2-week surveillance period and then self-reported their average daily minutes on each platform immediately after. Larger proportions of students over-estimated than under-estimated their use, with the largest overestimations found on the most heavily used platforms. Females logged significantly more SM time and were less accurate in reporting than were males and, independently, the likelihood of substantial inaccuracies in reporting total SM time and time on most individual platforms increased with each additional SM platform participants reported using. Findings demonstrate that self-reported estimates of SM time among adolescents in the age of SM platform swinging are prone to substantial error and may lead to biased conclusions about relationships between variables. Alternative measurement approaches are suggested to improve the validity of future research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah C. Boyle & Sebastian Baez & Bradley M. Trager & Joseph W. LaBrie, 2022. "Systematic Bias in Self-Reported Social Media Use in the Age of Platform Swinging: Implications for Studying Social Media Use in Relation to Adolescent Health Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9847-:d:884566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Guijin & Hicks, Danielle L. & Kedia, Satish & Regmi, Sanjaya & Mou, Xichen, 2024. "Mental health problems, substance use, and perceived risk as pathways to current cannabis use among high school seniors in the United States," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9847-:d:884566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.