IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9304-d875712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can Physical Inactivity in Girls Be Explained? A Socioecological Study in Public, Subsidized, and Private Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Soto-Lagos

    (Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Andres Bello University, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile)

  • Carolina Cortes-Varas

    (Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Andres Bello University, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile)

  • Solange Freire-Arancibia

    (Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Andres Bello University, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile)

  • María-Alejandra Energici

    (Faculty of Psychology, Alberto Hurtado University, Santiago 9160000, Chile)

  • Brent McDonald

    (Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

Abstract

In the last few years, the World Health Organization has highlighted that physical inactivity is a global issue affecting women to a greater extent than men. Faced with this, different nation states have developed public policies to reduce physical inactivity at school; however, the biomedical and individualistic models used have generated widespread criticism, as figures remain the same. In the context of failed interventions on increasing levels of physical activity, this study utilizes a socioecological model to analyze and understand how physical inactivity is reproduced in girls in the Chilean education system. A qualitative study was implemented, as it allows a focus on the entailed meanings, context, and processes. Active semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 groups comprising headmasters, teachers, non-teachers, students, and families. The results show that physical inactivity is linked to factors that go beyond the individualistic model; that is, consideration must include intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy dimensions. Furthermore, gender stereotypes gain relevance in physical education classes, in addition to friendships and family, teaching, and administrative work, access to safe play areas, use of spaces, and widespread cultural factors associated with men and women. This study concludes that the assessed gender differences should be approached from a pedagogical perspective beyond common sense, further reporting that the individualized explanation for physical inactivity is irrelevant to answer why women are more inactive than men.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Soto-Lagos & Carolina Cortes-Varas & Solange Freire-Arancibia & María-Alejandra Energici & Brent McDonald, 2022. "How Can Physical Inactivity in Girls Be Explained? A Socioecological Study in Public, Subsidized, and Private Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9304-:d:875712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel Frömel & Dorota Groffik & Michal Kudláček & Michal Šafář & Anna Zwierzchowska & Josef Mitáš, 2022. "The Differences in Physical Activity Preferences and Practices among High versus Low Active Adolescents in Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Senlin Chen & Baofu Wang & Stacy Imagbe & Xiangli Gu & Jared Androzzi & Yang Liu & Sami R. Yli-Piipari & Gang Hu & Amanda E. Staiano, 2022. "Adolescents’ Behaviors, Fitness, and Knowledge Related to Active Living before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Rachel L. Knight & Melitta A. McNarry & Adam W. Runacres & James Shelley & Liba Sheeran & Kelly A. Mackintosh, 2022. "Moving Forward: Understanding Correlates of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour during COVID-19 in Children and Adolescents—An Integrative Review and Socioecological Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Donglin Hu & Shi Zhou & Zachary J. Crowley-McHattan & Zhiyun Liu, 2021. "Factors That Influence Participation in Physical Activity in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review from the Social Ecological Model Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Soto-Lagos & Tatiana Castillo-Parada & Luiz Pozo-Gómez & Pablo Romero-Álvarez & Gabriel Urzúa, 2024. "How to Reduce Physical Inactivity in School Context? A Systematic Review of the Concept of Body Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anwar Al-Nuaim & Ayazullah Safi, 2023. "Factors Influencing Saudi Youth Physical Activity Participation: A Qualitative Study Based on the Social Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Rodrigo Soto-Lagos & Tatiana Castillo-Parada & Luiz Pozo-Gómez & Pablo Romero-Álvarez & Gabriel Urzúa, 2024. "How to Reduce Physical Inactivity in School Context? A Systematic Review of the Concept of Body Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Lin Zhou & Wei Liang & Yuxiu He & Yanping Duan & Ryan E. Rhodes & Hao Liu & Hongmei Liang & Xiaowei Shi & Jun Zhang & Yingzhe Cheng, 2022. "Relationship of 24-Hour Movement Behaviors with Weight Status and Body Composition in Chinese Primary School Children: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Changqing Xiang & Jie Zhao & Tengku Fadilah Tengku Kamalden & Wenting Dong & Hua Luo & Normala Ismail, 2023. "The effectiveness of child and adolescent sports engagement in China: an analysis of China’s results for the 2016–2022 Global Matrix report cards on physical activity," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Romain Marconnot & Jorge Pérez-Corrales & Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar & Javier Güeita-Rodríguez & Pilar Carrasco-Garrido & Cristina García-Bravo & Eva Solera-Hernández & Sonia Gutiérrez Gómez-Calcerr, 2021. "The Perspective of Physical Education Teachers in Spain Regarding Barriers to the Practice of Physical Activity among Immigrant Children and Adolescents: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Cameron M. Gee & Brianna T. Tsui & Kathleen A. Martin Ginis & Erica V. Bennett & Kelly P. Arbour-Nicitopoulos & Christine Voss, 2024. "Using Qualitative Geospatial Methods to Explore Physical Activity in Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Feasibility Study," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, October.
    7. George N. Papageorgiou & Elena Tsappi, 2024. "Development of an Active Transportation Framework Model for Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Saima Kuu & Joe Noormets & Triin Rääsk & Kirsti Pedak & Viktor Saaron & Karin Baskin & Kristjan Port, 2024. "Comparison of Estonian Schoolchildren’s Physical Activity and Fitness Indicators before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Period of Restricted Mobility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Xingxing Zong & Mariusz Lipowski & Taofeng Liu & Meng Qiao & Qi Bo, 2022. "The Sustainable Development of Psychological Education in Students’ Learning Concept in Physical Education Based on Machine Learning and the Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9304-:d:875712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.