IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9205-d873634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Attributions—Mothers’ Voices in Economically and Socially Disadvantaged Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Narciso

    (CICPSI, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Sara Albuquerque

    (HEI-Lab, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal
    Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, The University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Maria Francisca Ribeiro

    (Ponto de Apoio à Vida, Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Luana Cunha Ferreira

    (CICPSI, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Mariana Fernandes

    (ProChild CoLAB, Campus de Azurém, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

In the present study, the attributions of socially and economically disadvantaged mothers for their own negative parenting behavior and for their children’s undesirable behaviors as perceived by parents—understood as misbehavior—were analyzed. To this end, an exploratory study with a qualitative design was developed, in which 24 socially and economically disadvantaged mothers were individually interviewed. The data were analyzed following a thematic analysis approach, using software suited to qualitative analysis, namely NVIVO 12. The children’s undesirable behaviors as perceived by parents and some characteristics associated with parental performance (particularly the appraisal of the effectiveness of their negative practices) emerged respectively as external and internal factors, explaining mothers’ inadaptive behaviors—difficulties in behavior regulation, physical coercion, psychological control and paraverbal hostility. The parental subsystem and school emerged as the main external factors, and the psychological characteristics as the most relevant internal factors, explaining the children’s undesirable behaviors—challenge, immaturity, hostility, emotionally-based, school behavior/absenteeism and danger. The results also indicate weak self-critical reflexivity regarding some of the inadaptive behaviors. The comprehensive analysis of the results, based on the literature review, gave rise to an explanatory hypothesis on the dysfunctional circular process regarding the maintenance of inadaptive practices and children’s undesirable behaviors, considering the role played by parental attributions and by insufficient parental reflexivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Narciso & Sara Albuquerque & Maria Francisca Ribeiro & Luana Cunha Ferreira & Mariana Fernandes, 2022. "Parental Attributions—Mothers’ Voices in Economically and Socially Disadvantaged Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9205-:d:873634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Mourik, K. & Crone, M.R. & Pels, T.V.M. & Reis, R., 2016. "Parents' beliefs about the cause of parenting problems and relevance of parenting support: Understanding low participation of ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status families in the Netherlands," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 345-352.
    2. Schofield, Thomas J. & Conger, Rand D. & Gonzales, Joseph E. & Merrick, Melissa T., 2016. "Harsh parenting, physical health, and the protective role of positive parent-adolescent relationships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 18-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narciso, Isabel & Relvas, Ana Paula & Ferreira, Luana Cunha & Vieira-Santos, Salomé & Fernandes, Mariana & de Santa-Bárbara, Sílvia & Machado, Inês, 2018. "Mapping the “good mother” – Meanings and experiences in economically and socially disadvantaged contexts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 418-427.
    2. Chen, Ying & Kubzansky, Laura D. & VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2019. "Parental warmth and flourishing in mid-life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 65-72.
    3. Zhang, Anao & Liu, Chun & Bornheimer, Lindsay A. & Solomon, Phyllis & Wang, Kaipeng & Morrow, So'Phelia, 2019. "The indirect effect of bullying on adolescent self-rated health through mental health: A gender specific pattern," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    4. van Mourik, K. & Crone, M.R. & Reis, R., 2018. "Relevance of the intervention module “Coping with stress and unhelpful emotions” for parents living in multi-ethnic deprived neighborhoods," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 426-433.
    5. Nair, Nayantara & Taylor, Zoe E. & Evich, Carly D. & Jones, Blake L., 2020. "Relations of positive parenting, effortful control, and resilience in rural Midwestern Latinx early adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Kim, Chong Min & Lee, Jeon-Yi, 2020. "Effects of South Korea’s educational welfare priority project on elementary- and middle-school students’ changes in self-esteem and adaptation to school life," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Alessia Cadamuro & Elisa Bisagno & Elena Trifiletti & Gian Antonio Di Bernardo & Emilio Paolo Visintin, 2022. "Parental Support during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Friend or Foe? A Moderation Analysis of the Association between Maternal Anxiety and Children’s Stress in Italian Dyads," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9205-:d:873634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.