IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4519-d542586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusiveness of Urban Space and Tools for the Assessment of the Quality of Urban Life—A Critical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Agata Gawlak

    (Institute of Architecture, Urban Planning and Heritage Protection, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Magda Matuszewska

    (Institute of Architecture, Urban Planning and Heritage Protection, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Ptak

    (Institute of Architecture, Urban Planning and Heritage Protection, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

This article aims to compare the international tools assessing the quality of life and to carry out their multifaceted qualitative analysis, emphasizing spatial aspects (architecture, urban planning) and demographic changes. Comparative analysis of three guidelines and 13 rankings includes a comparison of a wide range of domains (2–15), criteria (4–66), and indices (22–223). The already observed worldwide trends of aging societies and increasing urban populations have largely drawn the attention of researchers to the urban life quality. Since the early 1990s, many international tools have been developed for that purpose. Although urban practitioners progressively rely on instruments measuring urban quality of life, in the development of urban policy, there is still little research comparing the already available appraisal instruments in view of their measurement criteria. The results of the research on the global tools show that there are major differences between them, either in view of the purpose, the contracting authorities, research focus group, scale, or in view of the importance of spatial and demographic factors. Such findings can contribute to the development of local guidelines and recommendations for self-government authorities and communities, in this the seniors and future generations, in view of improving the urban life quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Agata Gawlak & Magda Matuszewska & Agnieszka Ptak, 2021. "Inclusiveness of Urban Space and Tools for the Assessment of the Quality of Urban Life—A Critical Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4519-:d:542586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4519/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4519/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Wachsmuth & Daniel Aldana Cohen & Hillary Angelo, 2016. "Expand the frontiers of urban sustainability," Nature, Nature, vol. 536(7617), pages 391-393, August.
    2. Jenny McArthur & Enora Robin, 2019. "Victims of their own (definition of) success: Urban discourse and expert knowledge production in the Liveable City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1711-1728, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele Acuto & Daniel Pejic & Jessie Briggs, 2021. "Taking City Rankings Seriously: Engaging with Benchmarking Practices in Global Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 363-377, March.
    2. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.
    3. Hefeng Wang & Yishao Shi & Anbing Zhang & Yuan Cao & Haixin Liu, 2017. "Does Suburbanization Cause Ecological Deterioration? An Empirical Analysis of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2018. "Community Food Growing in Parks? Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility in Sheffield, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Katherine Perrott, 2020. "Does New Urbanism “Just Show Up”? Deliberate Process and the Evolving Plan for Markham Centre," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 388-403.
    6. Enora Robin & Laura Nkula-Wenz, 2021. "Beyond the success/failure of travelling urban models: Exploring the politics of time and performance in Cape Town’s East City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1252-1273, September.
    7. Francesco Fuso Nerini & Adriaan Slob & Rebecka Ericsdotter Engström & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2019. "A Research and Innovation Agenda for Zero-Emission European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Neil Brenner & Swarnabh Ghosh, 2022. "Between the colossal and the catastrophic: Planetary urbanization and the political ecologies of emergent infectious disease," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(5), pages 867-910, August.
    9. Romit Chowdhury & Colin McFarlane, 2022. "The crowd and citylife: Materiality, negotiation and inclusivity at Tokyo’s train stations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1353-1371, May.
    10. John E. Fernández & Marcela Angel, 2020. "Ecological City-States in an Era of Environmental Disaster: Security, Climate Change and Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Roger Keil, 2020. "An urban political ecology for a world of cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2357-2370, August.
    12. Robert Martin, 2021. "AV futures or futures with AVs? Bridging sociotechnical imaginaries and a multi-level perspective of autonomous vehicle visualisations in praxis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Clara Irazábal & Paola Jirón, 2021. "Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawling provincialising," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 507-534, February.
    14. María de Fátima Poza-Vilches & José Gutiérrez-Pérez & María Teresa Pozo-Llorente, 2020. "Quality Criteria to Evaluate Performance and Scope of 2030 Agenda in Metropolitan Areas: Case Study on Strategic Planning of Environmental Municipality Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.
    15. Jeff Rose & Adrienne Cachelin, 2018. "Critical sustainability: incorporating critical theories into contested sustainabilities," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 518-525, December.
    16. Rachel Bok, 2021. "Wayfinding in the Long Shadow of City Benchmarking: Or How to Manufacture (an Economy of) Comparability in the Global Urban," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 381-384, March.
    17. Ming Meng & Lixue Wang & Qu Chen, 2018. "Quota Allocation for Carbon Emissions in China’s Electric Power Industry Based Upon the Fairness Principle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Marit Rosol & Vincent Béal & Samuel Mössner, 2017. "Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1710-1718, August.
    19. Muhammad Adil Rauf & Olaf Weber, 2021. "Urban infrastructure finance and its relationship to land markets, land development, and sustainability: a case study of the city of Islamabad, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5016-5034, April.
    20. Vahid Javidroozi & Claudia Carter & Michael Grace & Hanifa Shah, 2023. "Smart, Sustainable, Green Cities: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4519-:d:542586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.