IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1396-d492337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of a Combined Intervention of Computerized Cognitive Training Preceded by Physical Exercise for Improving Frailty Status and Cognitive Function in Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Ruby Yu

    (Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    CUHK Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Grace Leung

    (CUHK Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Jean Woo

    (Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    CUHK Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

(1) Objective: This study examined the effects of a combined intervention of Brainastic computerized cognitive training (CCT) preceded by physical exercise (PE) for improving frailty status and cognitive function in older adults. (2) Methods: Older adults aged 50 years or older attending elderly centers, without frailty/history of cognitive impairment, were randomly allocated into either a 12-week (i) multi-domain CCT + PE ( n = 117), (ii) two-domain CCT + PE ( n = 116) or (iii) video watching + PE (i.e., control, n = 114). Brainastic is an online application for cognitive training through video games. The multi-domain CCT targeted memory, attention, executive function, flexibility and visuospatial ability while the two-domain CCT targeted memory and attention. PE included both aerobic and resistance exercises. Outcomes were changes in frailty levels as measured with a simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL), global cognition as measured with the Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS), total learning and verbal memory abilities as measured with the Hong Kong List Learning Test (HKLLT), and executive functions as measured with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) over 12 weeks. (3) Results: Participants in the intervention groups (multi-/two-domain CCT + PE) showed greater improvements in frailty status, total learning ability and verbal memory ability than control participants (all p < 0.05). The multi-domain CCT did not outperform the two-domain CCT in improving frailty status or cognitive function. The training effects were independent of the baseline cognition of the participants. (4) Conclusions: A combined intervention of multi-/two-domain CCT preceded by PE seemed to convey benefit over video watching preceded by PE in improving frailty status and cognitive function among older adults attending elderly centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruby Yu & Grace Leung & Jean Woo, 2021. "Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of a Combined Intervention of Computerized Cognitive Training Preceded by Physical Exercise for Improving Frailty Status and Cognitive Function in Older Adul," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1396-:d:492337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amit Lampit & Harry Hallock & Michael Valenzuela, 2014. "Computerized Cognitive Training in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effect Modifiers," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Renae L. Smith-Ray & Susan L. Hughes & Thomas R. Prohaska & Deborah M. Little & Donald A. Jurivich & Donald Hedeker, 2015. "Impact of Cognitive Training on Balance and Gait in Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(3), pages 357-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiho Amano & Ryuichi Ohta & Chiaki Sano, 2021. "Recognition of Anemia in Elderly People in a Rural Community Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Boyu Qiu & Yanrong Chen & Xu He & Ting Liu & Sixian Wang & Wei Zhang, 2021. "Short-Term Touch-Screen Video Game Playing Improves the Inhibition Ability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego Moreno-Blanco & Javier Solana-Sánchez & Patricia Sánchez-González & Manuel Jiménez-Hernando & Gabriele Cattaneo & Alba Roca & Joyce Gomes-Osman & Josep María Tormos-Muñoz & David Bartrés-Faz & Á, 2021. "Intelligent Coaching Assistant for the Promotion of Healthy Habits in a Multidomain mHealth-Based Intervention for Brain Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Ae-Ri Jung & Dasom Kim & Eun-A Park, 2021. "Cognitive Intervention Using Information and Communication Technology for Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Sala, Giovanni & Aksayli, N. Deniz & Tatlidil, K. Semir & Gondo, Yasuyuki & Gobet, Fernand, 2019. "Working memory training does not enhance older adults' cognitive skills: A comprehensive meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Samuel Cooke & Kyla Pennington & Arwel Jones & Chris Bridle & Mark F Smith & Ffion Curtis, 2020. "Effects of exercise, cognitive, and dual-task interventions on cognition in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Shengwen Zhou & Yanjie Zhang & Zhaowei Kong & Paul D. Loprinzi & Yang Hu & Jiajie Ye & Shijie Liu & Jane Jie Yu & Liye Zou, 2019. "The Effects of Tai Chi on Markers of Atherosclerosis, Lower-limb Physical Function, and Cognitive Ability in Adults Aged Over 60: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Hugo Rosado & Catarina Pereira & Jorge Bravo & Joana Carvalho & Armando Raimundo, 2022. "Benefits of Two 24-Week Interactive Cognitive–Motor Programs on Body Composition, Lower-Body Strength, and Processing Speed in Community Dwellings at Risk of Falling: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Carmen Requena & George W. Rebok, 2019. "Evaluating Successful Aging in Older People Who Participated in Computerized or Paper-and-Pencil Memory Training: The Memoria Mejor Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Kochaphan Phirom & Teerawat Kamnardsiri & Somporn Sungkarat, 2020. "Beneficial Effects of Interactive Physical-Cognitive Game-Based Training on Fall Risk and Cognitive Performance of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Scott Domingue & Skip Morelock & Judith Walsh & Patricia Newcomb & Christine Russe & Alexander Nava & Ashley Jones & Jessy R. John, 2018. "Beyond fall risk assessment: A case–control study in an Urban Medical Center," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3894-3899, November.
    10. Scharfen, Jana & Peters, Judith Marie & Holling, Heinz, 2018. "Retest effects in cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 44-66.
    11. Rodrigo Fernández López & Adoración Antolí, 2020. "Computer-based cognitive interventions in acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1396-:d:492337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.