IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p480-d477187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of an Online Survey to Assess Perception of Diabetes Risk and Barriers and Facilitators to Weight Loss Following Gestational Diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Kristy L. Gray

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Mayya Grebenshchikova

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Sharleen L. O’Reilly

    (School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Lois McKellar

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Peter M. Clifton

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Jennifer B. Keogh

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

Abstract

Our objective was to describe the development and validation of a survey investigating barriers to weight loss, perception of diabetes risk, and views of diet strategies following gestational diabetes (GDM). The survey underwent three stages of development: generation of items, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. A content validation index (CVI) was calculated from expert responses regarding item relevance, coherence, clarity, and response options. Experts also responded to the domain fit of questions linked to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Pilot responders answered the survey and responded to review questions. Six experts in the field of nutrition, midwifery, psychology, or other health or medical research completed the expert review stage of the survey. In the pilot test, there were 20 responders who were women with previous GDM and who were living in Australia. The overall CVI from the expert review was 0.91. All questions except one received an I-CVI of >0.78 for relevance ( n = 35). Fourteen of the 27 items linked to the TDF received an agreement ratio of <1.0. Twenty-seven of the 31 pilot questions were completed by ≥90% of responders. Pilot review questions revealed an agreement percentage of ≥86% ( n = 12) regarding the survey’s ease to complete, understand, importance, length, and interest level. The final survey tool consists of 30 items and achieved content validation through expert evaluation and pilot testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristy L. Gray & Mayya Grebenshchikova & Sharleen L. O’Reilly & Lois McKellar & Peter M. Clifton & Jennifer B. Keogh, 2021. "Development and Validation of an Online Survey to Assess Perception of Diabetes Risk and Barriers and Facilitators to Weight Loss Following Gestational Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:480-:d:477187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/480/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/480/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, S.Y. & England, L. & Wilson, H.G. & Bish, C. & Satten, G.A. & Dietz, P., 2010. "Percentage of gestational diabetes mellitus attributable to overweight and obesity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(6), pages 1047-1052.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristy L. Gray & Peter M. Clifton & Jennifer B. Keogh, 2021. "Weight Loss Barriers and Dietary Quality of Intermittent and Continuous Dieters in Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristy L. Gray & Lois McKellar & Sharleen L. O’Reilly & Peter M. Clifton & Jennifer B. Keogh, 2020. "Women’s Barriers to Weight Loss, Perception of Future Diabetes Risk and Opinions of Diet Strategies Following Gestational Diabetes: An Online Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Kataryna Jaworsky & Jeffrey L. Ebersole & Petar Planinic & Arpita Basu, 2021. "Associations of Diet with Cardiometabolic and Inflammatory Profiles in Pregnant Women at Risk for Metabolic Complications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Michelle Lende & Asha Rijhsinghani, 2020. "Gestational Diabetes: Overview with Emphasis on Medical Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:480-:d:477187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.