IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7300-d590582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Flexibility Is Key for Reducing the Severity and Impact of Fibromyalgia

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel A. Vallejo

    (Psychology Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Laura Vallejo-Slocker

    (Psychology Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Martin Offenbaecher

    (Department of Orthopedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany)

  • Jameson K. Hirsch

    (Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

  • Loren L. Toussaint

    (Department of Psychology, Luther College, Decorah, IA 52101, USA)

  • Niko Kohls

    (Division of Integrative Health Promotion, University of Applied Science and Arts, 96450 Coburg, Germany)

  • Fuschia Sirois

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 2LT, UK)

  • Javier Rivera

    (Rehumatology Unit, Instituto Provincial de Rehabilitación, Hospital General Universitario “Gregorio Marañón”, 28028 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Fibromyalgia has a significant impact on the lives of patients; symptoms are influenced by psychological factors, such as psychological flexibility and catastrophizing. The objective of this study was to determine the importance of these variables in moderating the association between the severity and impact of fibromyalgia symptoms. A total of 187 patients from a general hospital population were evaluated using the Combined Index of Severity of Fibromyalgia (ICAF), the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). A series of multiple regression analyses were carried out using the PROCESS macro and decision tree analysis. The results show that psychological flexibility modulates the relation between severity and the impact of fibromyalgia symptoms. Catastrophism has residual importance and depends on the interaction with psychological flexibility. Interaction occurs if the severity of the disease is in transition from a mild to a moderate level and accounts for 40.1% of the variance in the sample. These aspects should be considered for evaluation and early intervention in fibromyalgia patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel A. Vallejo & Laura Vallejo-Slocker & Martin Offenbaecher & Jameson K. Hirsch & Loren L. Toussaint & Niko Kohls & Fuschia Sirois & Javier Rivera, 2021. "Psychological Flexibility Is Key for Reducing the Severity and Impact of Fibromyalgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7300-:d:590582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei-Yin Loh, 2014. "Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(3), pages 329-348, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farkas, Sébastien & Lopez, Olivier & Thomas, Maud, 2021. "Cyber claim analysis using Generalized Pareto regression trees with applications to insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 92-105.
    2. Emilio Aguirre & Federico García-Suárez & Gabriela Sicilia, 2021. "Eficiencia técnica en la ganadería de carne bovina pastoril. Medición y exploración de sus determinantes en Uruguay," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1321, Department of Economics - dECON.
    3. Lotfi Boudabsa & Damir Filipovi'c, 2022. "Ensemble learning for portfolio valuation and risk management," Papers 2204.05926, arXiv.org.
    4. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Du, Yuquan, 2020. "Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. A. Poterie & J.-F. Dupuy & V. Monbet & L. Rouvière, 2019. "Classification tree algorithm for grouped variables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1613-1648, December.
    6. Eduardo Rodríguez Sánchez & Eduardo Filemón Vázquez Santacruz & Humberto Cervantes Maceda, 2023. "Effort and Cost Estimation Using Decision Tree Techniques and Story Points in Agile Software Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Suryo Adi Rakhmawan & M. Hafidz Omar & Muhammad Riaz & Nasir Abbas, 2023. "Hotelling T 2 Control Chart for Detecting Changes in Mortality Models Based on Machine-Learning Decision Tree," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Olga Takacs & Janos Vincze, 2018. "The within-job gender pay gap in Hungary," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1834, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    9. Michael Puglia & Adam Tucker, 2020. "Machine Learning, the Treasury Yield Curve and Recession Forecasting," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2020-038, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    10. Jiaming Mao & Jingzhi Xu, 2020. "Ensemble Learning with Statistical and Structural Models," Papers 2006.05308, arXiv.org.
    11. Kian Tehranian, 2023. "Can Machine Learning Catch Economic Recessions Using Economic and Market Sentiments?," Papers 2308.16200, arXiv.org.
    12. HOROBEȚ Alexandra & BULAI Vlad Cosmin, 2019. "Assessing the Local Developmental Impact of Hydrocarbon Exploitation in a Mature Region: A Random Forest Approach," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    13. Yu-Shan Shih & Kuang-Hsun Liu, 2019. "Regression trees for detecting preference patterns from rank data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 683-702, September.
    14. Osman, Ibrahim H. & Anouze, Abdel Latef & Irani, Zahir & Lee, Habin & Medeni, Tunç D. & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2019. "A cognitive analytics management framework for the transformation of electronic government services from users’ perspective to create sustainable shared values," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 514-532.
    15. Renato Bruni & Gianpiero Bianchi, 2018. "Robustness Analysis of a Website Categorization Procedure based on Machine Learning," DIAG Technical Reports 2018-04, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    16. Jingfang Liu & Mengshi Shi & Huihong Jiang, 2022. "Detecting Suicidal Ideation in Social Media: An Ensemble Method Based on Feature Fusion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Tai, Chung-Ching & Lin, Hung-Wen & Chie, Bin-Tzong & Tung, Chen-Yuan, 2019. "Predicting the failures of prediction markets: A procedure of decision making using classification models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 297-312.
    18. Emilio Carrizosa & Cristina Molero-Río & Dolores Romero Morales, 2021. "Mathematical optimization in classification and regression trees," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 5-33, April.
    19. Quan Zhiyu & Valdez Emiliano A., 2018. "Predictive analytics of insurance claims using multivariate decision trees," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 377-407, December.
    20. Evan B Brooks & John W Coulston & Kurt H Riitters & David N Wear, 2020. "Using a hybrid demand-allocation algorithm to enable distributional analysis of land use change patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7300-:d:590582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.