IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7121-d587810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ecuadorian Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Adaptation and Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea M. Vinueza-Solórzano

    (Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, RS, Brazil)

  • Cecilia Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría

    (Research Center, University Espiritu Santo, Samborondón 09-01-952, Ecuador)

  • Clarissa P. P. de Freitas

    (Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, RJ, Brazil)

  • Wilmar B. Schaufeli

    (Research Group Work, Organizational and Personnel Psychology, FPPW, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Hans De Witte

    (Research Group Work, Organizational and Personnel Psychology, FPPW, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Optentia Research Unit, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

  • Claudio S. Hutz

    (Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-002, RS, Brazil)

  • Ana Claudia Souza Vazquez

    (Department of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, RS, Brazil)

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt and show evidence of validity for the Ecuadorian version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) considering only its “core” dimensions. The adaptation process included its translation and back translation. For content validation, expert reviews and focus groups were carried out. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the scale. The reliability of the scale was assessed through the alpha, omega and composite reliability indices. To carry out the study, the questionnaire was applied to a sample of workers with a high level of education in Ecuador. In total, 2237 respondents were considered in the analysis. The results showed that the hierarchical model for BAT-23 and its short version, the BAT-12 scale, is the most adequate structure for analysis of the construct in the Ecuadorian context. The reliability of the general factor of burnout and its dimensions, evaluated by composite reliability, omega and Cronbach’s alpha, showed satisfactory indices. The findings obtained provide support for the reliability and validity of the Burnout Assessment Tool for the Ecuadorian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea M. Vinueza-Solórzano & Cecilia Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría & Clarissa P. P. de Freitas & Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Hans De Witte & Claudio S. Hutz & Ana Claudia Souza Vazquez, 2021. "The Ecuadorian Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Adaptation and Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7121-:d:587810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood, Phil, 2008. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Timothy A. Brown," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 62, pages 91-91, February.
    2. Leon T. de Beer & Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Hans De Witte & Jari J. Hakanen & Akihito Shimazu & Jürgen Glaser & Christian Seubert & Janine Bosak & Jorge Sinval & Maksim Rudnev, 2020. "Measurement Invariance of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) Across Seven Cross-National Representative Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Steffie Desart & Hans De Witte, 2020. "Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Greta Mazzetti & Chiara Consiglio & Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia & Laura Borgogni & Dina Guglielmi & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2022. "Italian Validation of the 12-Item Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. George S. Androulakis & Dimitra Ap. Georgiou & Olga Lainidi & Anthony Montgomery & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2023. "The Greek Burnout Assessment Tool: Examining Its Adaptation and Validity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Jorge Sinval & Ana Claudia S. Vazquez & Claudio Simon Hutz & Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Sílvia Silva, 2022. "Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Chiara Consiglio & Greta Mazzetti & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2021. "Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu Da & Silje Fossum Fladmark & Irina Wara & Marit Christensen & Siw Tone Innstrand, 2022. "To Change or Not to Change: A Study of Workplace Change during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Leon T. de Beer, 2021. "Is There Utility in Specifying Professional Efficacy as an Outcome of Burnout in the Employee Health Impairment Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Chiara Consiglio & Greta Mazzetti & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2021. "Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Jorge Sinval & Ana Claudia S. Vazquez & Claudio Simon Hutz & Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Sílvia Silva, 2022. "Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Akiomi Inoue & Hisashi Eguchi & Yuko Kachi & Sarven S. McLinton & Maureen F. Dollard & Akizumi Tsutsumi, 2021. "Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the 12-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale (PSC-12J)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Haar, Jarrod & O'Kane, Conor, 2022. "A post-lockdown study of burnout risk amongst New Zealand essential workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    7. Jaana-Piia Mäkiniemi & Atte Oksanen & Anne Mäkikangas, 2021. "Loneliness and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Roles of Personal, Social and Organizational Resources on Perceived Stress and Exhaustion among Finnish University Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Katarzyna Tomaszek & Agnieszka Muchacka-Cymerman, 2021. "Be Aware of Burnout! The Role of Changes in Academic Burnout in Problematic Facebook Usage among University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Eric Osamudiamwen Aigbogun & Raihanah Ibrahim & Yusuf Yusufari & Uchenna Igbokwe & Chimelu Okongwu & Amina Abdulkarim & Hussaini Tijanni & Maina Modu & Rabiu Muhammad Fagge & Muyi Aina, 2023. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Routine Immunization Programs in Northern Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Steffie Desart & Hans De Witte, 2020. "Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Greta Mazzetti & Chiara Consiglio & Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia & Laura Borgogni & Dina Guglielmi & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2022. "Italian Validation of the 12-Item Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Fabienne Aust & Theresa Beneke & Corinna Peifer & Magdalena Wekenborg, 2022. "The Relationship between Flow Experience and Burnout Symptoms: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-30, March.
    13. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Brondino & Margherita Pasini, 2021. "On the Reciprocal Relationship between Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Outcomes. Testing a Cross-Lagged Longitudinal Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Céline Leclercq & Lutgart Braeckman & Pierre Firket & Audrey Babic & Isabelle Hansez, 2021. "Interest of a Joint Use of Two Diagnostic Tools of Burnout: Comparison between the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and the Early Detection Tool of Burnout Completed by Physicians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Agathe Nguyen Huynh & Christine Besse & Zakia Mediouni & Emna El May & Yara Shoman & Isabelle Hansez & Irina Guseva Canu, 2021. "Diagnostic Performances of an Occupational Burnout Detection Method Designed for Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, November.
    16. Siw Tone Innstrand, 2022. "Burnout among Health Care Professionals during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Irina Nikolova & Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Wilmar Schaufeli & Judith H. Semeijn, 2021. "Disengaging Leadership Scale (DLS): Evidence of Initial Validity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Ylse van Dijk & Sarah I. M. Janus & Michiel R. de Boer & Wilco P. Achterberg & Corne A. M. Roelen & Sytse U. Zuidema, 2022. "Job Demands, Work Functioning and Mental Health in Dutch Nursing Home Staff during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Multilevel Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, April.
    19. George S. Androulakis & Dimitra Ap. Georgiou & Olga Lainidi & Anthony Montgomery & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2023. "The Greek Burnout Assessment Tool: Examining Its Adaptation and Validity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-11, May.
    20. Henrique Pereira & Gergely Fehér & Antal Tibold & Samuel Monteiro & Vítor Costa & Graça Esgalhado, 2021. "The Impact of Shift Work on Occupational Health Indicators among Professionally Active Adults: A Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-10, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7121-:d:587810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.