IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p201-d470182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of the Validation Method in Work Satisfaction and Motivation of Nursing Home Care Professionals: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Iván Sánchez-Martínez

    (Research Group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Health and Social Outcomes (M 3 O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), 08500 Vic, Spain
    Fundació Privada Sant Andreu de Castellcir, Residència la Ginesta, 08183 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Raül Vilar

    (Validation Training Institute, Inc., P.O. Box 871, Pleasant Hill, OR 97455, USA)

  • Javier Irujo

    (Validation Training Institute, Inc., P.O. Box 871, Pleasant Hill, OR 97455, USA)

  • Duna Ulsamer

    (Validation Training Institute, Inc., P.O. Box 871, Pleasant Hill, OR 97455, USA)

  • Dolors Cano

    (Validation Training Institute, Inc., P.O. Box 871, Pleasant Hill, OR 97455, USA)

  • Celia Casaca Soares

    (Centre for Interdisciplinary Applied Research in Health (CIIAS/IPS), School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, 2914-503 Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Ángel Acevedo

    (Fundació Vella Terra, Residència, Centre de dia i Casal de Les Corts, 08029 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Javier Jerez-Roig

    (Research Group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Health and Social Outcomes (M 3 O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), 08500 Vic, Spain)

  • Montserrat Celdrán

    (Research Group in Gerontology (GIG), Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona (UB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to carry out a literature review on the effectiveness of the validation method (VM) in job satisfaction and motivation of care professionals working with older people in nursing homes. The review was carried out in specialised databases: Scopus, PsychINFO, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Google Scholar, Scielo, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 9046 results were obtained, out of which a total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: five quantitative, four qualitative, one single case series, two quasi-experimental and two mixed methods studies. The results of the analysed studies report that the VM can be an effective tool that facilitates communication and interaction in care, reducing levels of stress and job dissatisfaction among care professionals. The VM facilitates communication between professionals and older people with dementia, and improves the management of complex situations that may arise in care, directly influencing a reduction in work stress and increasing job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Iván Sánchez-Martínez & Raül Vilar & Javier Irujo & Duna Ulsamer & Dolors Cano & Celia Casaca Soares & Ángel Acevedo & Javier Jerez-Roig & Montserrat Celdrán, 2020. "Effectiveness of the Validation Method in Work Satisfaction and Motivation of Nursing Home Care Professionals: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:201-:d:470182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Célia Casaca Soares & António Manuel Marques & Pat Clarke & Regina Klein & Liisa Koskinen & Daine Krasuckiene & Evelina Lamsodiene & Viktorija Piscalkiene & Özlem Küçükgüçlü, 2019. "Older people’s views and expectations about the competences of health and social care professionals: a European qualitative study," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 53-62, March.
    2. Marie Y. Savundranayagam & Mary Lee Hummert & Rhonda J. V. Montgomery, 2005. "Investigating the Effects of Communication Problems on Caregiver Burden," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 60(1), pages 48-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen Lloyd & Pratima Singh & Rowena Merritt & Adarsh Shetty & Swaran Singh & Tom Burns, 2013. "Sources of parental burden in a UK sample of first-generation North Indian Punjabi Sikhs and their white British counterparts," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(2), pages 147-156, March.
    2. Erin R Conway & Helen J Chenery, 2016. "Evaluating the MESSAGE Communication Strategies in Dementia training for use with community‐based aged care staff working with people with dementia: a controlled pretest–post‐test study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1145-1155, April.
    3. Kriegel, Johannes & Rissbacher, Clemens & Pölzl, Alois & Tuttle-Weidinger, Linda & Reckwitz, Nanni, 2020. "Levers for integrating social work into primary healthcare networks in Austria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 75-82.
    4. Rute Lemos & Alexandra Lopes & Isabel Dias & Henrique Barros, 2022. "Portuguese Older Persons’ Views about Living in a Nursing Home: Challenges to the Rehabilitation of the Image of LTC in Post-Pandemic Times," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:201-:d:470182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.