IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p1145-1155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the MESSAGE Communication Strategies in Dementia training for use with community‐based aged care staff working with people with dementia: a controlled pretest–post‐test study

Author

Listed:
  • Erin R Conway
  • Helen J Chenery

Abstract

Aims and Objectives The study aims to evaluate the effects of a communication skills training programme on community aged care staff's knowledge of communication support in dementia and on staff's care experience. Background Dementia can lead to impairments in communication. Therefore, quality community‐based dementia care requires that staff be skilled communicators, equipped to facilitate interactions with people with dementia. The current investigation evaluated the effectiveness of the MESSAGE Communication Strategies in Dementia for Care Staff training programme with respect to knowledge of communication support and the staff/caregiver experience. Design A multi‐centre controlled pretest/post‐test design with randomised cohort allocation was used. Outcome measures were completed at baseline, immediately after training (training group only), and at three‐month follow‐up. Methods Thirty‐eight care staff working in community aged care participated and completed all outcome measures (training = 22; control = 16).Training and control groups completed the following outcome measures: knowledge of communication support strategies, self‐efficacy, preparedness to provide care, strain in nursing care and attitude to dementia care. Staff in the training group provided written feedback on the training. Results A significant improvement in knowledge scores from baseline was found for the training group both immediately after training and at three‐month follow‐up. There was also a significant training effect for self‐efficacy and preparedness to provide care. No significant difference was found for the control group for any measure. No significant training effects were found for measures of strain or attitudes to dementia care. Feedback from staff suggests that the training was well received. Conclusions The MESSAGE training was positively received by staff and had a significant effect on care staff knowledge, and confidence to provide care for people with dementia. Relevance to clinical practice The easily accessible multimedia training programme is well received by staff and has the potential to improve quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin R Conway & Helen J Chenery, 2016. "Evaluating the MESSAGE Communication Strategies in Dementia training for use with community‐based aged care staff working with people with dementia: a controlled pretest–post‐test study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1145-1155, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1145-1155
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13134
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Y. Savundranayagam & Mary Lee Hummert & Rhonda J. V. Montgomery, 2005. "Investigating the Effects of Communication Problems on Caregiver Burden," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 60(1), pages 48-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hoang Nguyen & Daniel Terry & Hoang Phan & James Vickers & Fran McInerney, 2019. "Communication training and its effects on carer and care‐receiver outcomes in dementia settings: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1050-1069, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen Lloyd & Pratima Singh & Rowena Merritt & Adarsh Shetty & Swaran Singh & Tom Burns, 2013. "Sources of parental burden in a UK sample of first-generation North Indian Punjabi Sikhs and their white British counterparts," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(2), pages 147-156, March.
    2. Iván Sánchez-Martínez & Raül Vilar & Javier Irujo & Duna Ulsamer & Dolors Cano & Celia Casaca Soares & Ángel Acevedo & Javier Jerez-Roig & Montserrat Celdrán, 2020. "Effectiveness of the Validation Method in Work Satisfaction and Motivation of Nursing Home Care Professionals: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1145-1155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.