IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i12p4188-d370483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Burden and Perceived Social Support in Male Partners of Women with Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin J. Jabłoński

    (Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow, 31-501 Kraków, Poland)

  • Francisco García-Torres

    (Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
    IMIBIC Health Research Institute, Reina Sofía University Hospital of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain)

  • Paulina Zielińska

    (The Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology (MCMCC) branch in Krakow, 31-115 Kraków, Poland)

  • Alicja Bułat

    (The Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology (MCMCC) branch in Krakow, 31-115 Kraków, Poland)

  • Piotr Brandys

    (The Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology (MCMCC) branch in Krakow, 31-115 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to describe the correlations between the psychosocial burden on male caregivers and their perception of social support, as well as distress, anxiety, and depression among their partners in the first six months after a cancer diagnosis. Methods: A cross-sectional, longitudinal and observational study was conducted on a group of 61 couples, with the use of Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS), Berlín Social Support Scales (BSSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Distress Thermometer (DT). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica v.13. Results: A strong positive correlation between the ZBI and CBS, as well as between support-seeking and the emotional involvement of male partners, was documented. The negative correlation between the lack of instrumental support and a much greater burden on caregivers, in emotional, social, and family life was documented. The level of distress, anxiety, and depression, as well as family problems reported by female patients, were positively correlated with the male caregiver′s burden. A demographic analysis showed significant relationships between the number of offspring and the negative health indicators of patients and their partners. Implications: The obtained results encourage deeper reflection on the need to improve the availability of instrumental support for male caregivers and support for families with an oncological ill parent in caring for minor children, and to maintain the social activity of the caregiver.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin J. Jabłoński & Francisco García-Torres & Paulina Zielińska & Alicja Bułat & Piotr Brandys, 2020. "Emotional Burden and Perceived Social Support in Male Partners of Women with Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4188-:d:370483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zofia Stojak & Jacek Jamiolkowski & Slawomir Chlabicz & Ludmila Marcinowicz, 2019. "Levels of Satisfaction, Workload Stress and Support Amongst Informal Caregivers of Patients Receiving or Not Receiving Long-Term Home Nursing Care in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Margaret L. Longacre & Vivian G. Valdmanis & Elizabeth A. Handorf & Carolyn Y. Fang, 2017. "Work Impact and Emotional Stress Among Informal Caregivers for Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 522-531.
    3. Marcin Rzeszutek, 2018. "A longitudinal analysis of posttraumatic growth and affective well-being among people living with HIV: The moderating role of received and provided social support," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Carmassi & Claudia Foghi & Valerio Dell’Oste & Carlo Antonio Bertelloni & Andrea Fiorillo & Liliana Dell’Osso, 2020. "Risk and Protective Factors for PTSD in Caregivers of Adult Patients with Severe Medical Illnesses: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Alberto Sardella & Vittorio Lenzo & Angela Alibrandi & Antonino Catalano & Francesco Corica & Maria C. Quattropani & Giorgio Basile, 2021. "A Clinical Bridge between Family Caregivers and Older Adults: The Contribution of Patients’ Frailty and Optimism on Caregiver Burden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunxiang Huang & Dan Luo & Xi Chen & Dexing Zhang & Zhulin Huang & Shuiyuan Xiao, 2020. "HIV-Related Stress Experienced by Newly Diagnosed People Living with HIV in China: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Echo L. Warner & Andrew R. Wilson & Jessica G. Rainbow & Lee Ellington & Anne C. Kirchhoff, 2021. "Employment of Young Adult Cancer Caregivers, Other Disease Caregivers, and Non-Caregiving Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Masahiro Toyama & Heather R. Fuller & Joel M. Hektner, 2020. "Psychosocial Factors Promoting Personal Growth Throughout Adulthood," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1749-1769, June.
    4. Maria Adriana Henriques & David de Sousa Loura & Paulo Nogueira & Graça Melo & Idalina Gomes & Isabel Ferraz & Laura Viegas & Andreia Costa, 2022. "Does Reality Overcome the Expected? Survey on Informal Caregivers’ Profile: A Nurse-Led Study in Times of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4188-:d:370483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.